es in my config ?
Cordialement
Patrick GINHOUX
*De :* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *De la part
de* Federico Cabiddu
*Envoyé :* jeudi 23 mars 2017 17:38
*À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
*Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] Question on the debug change level command with
5.
Hi,
you have to load the cfg_rpc module (
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.0.x/modules/cfg_rpc.html). Then you
can run
kamcmd cfg.set_now_int core debug .
Regards,
Federico
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Ginhoux, Patrick <
patrick.ginh...@fr.unisys.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Previously,
Hi,
param name has changed some versions ago:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.p.ds_probing_threshold
Cheers,
Federico
On 16 Mar 2017 13:35, "Ginhoux, Patrick"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m migrating my kamailio.cfg from the 3.3.1 release to 5.0.0 and
>
Hi,
you can use the flag "0x04" when calling save():
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/registrar.html#registrar.f.save
Regards,
Federico
On 28 Jan 2017 20:13, "Aqs Younas" wrote:
> Greetings list,
> I want to keep single AOR per contact. If new regitration comes i want to
> r
Hi,
I analyzed and reproduced your issue and here's my conclusions:
1) in your scenario TSILO module is not involved nor needed. TSILO
implements "deferred" parallel forking while, in your case, what you are
trying to implement is serial forking with chained transaction suspensions.
You can see in
Hi,
I'll be there and willing to participate to the dinner!
Cheers,
Federico
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> anyone else interested in having a dinner event at Fosdem?
>
> Soon there has to be a decision and hopefully Torrey (cc-ed) can help
> agai
exit;
>
>
>
> # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also
> if (is_method("INVITE"))
> setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
>
> route(RELAY);
> route(STORETRAN);
> exit;
>
>
> r
Hi,
could you please provide the LOCATION route and the Kamailio's log at level
3?
Thank you.
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Tomas Zanet wrote:
> Hello,
> I’m using Kamailio 4.4.4 with TSILO module in order to support Push
> Notifications used by our voip app on Apple ios1
my presentation the call to
lua_runstring("do_push([[$hdr(X-VxTo)]], [[$tU]], [[$hdr(XVxFrom)]],
[[$fU]], [[$ci]])")<0)
is actually just an example of where, in the Kamailio script, the logic for
sending the push should be placed.
Regards,
Federico
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:46 PM,
Hi Benjamin,
if you don't plan to support multiple devices per account just the
t_suspend/t_continue pair should be enough to support push notification.
This being said you can easily integrate the example in my presentation in
the Kamailio's configuration given in the Asterisk/Kamailio integration
Hi,
about your questions:
Q1: yes it's feasible as long as the two Registrars (Kamailio) have the
location information. Please see my reply on a thread on this topic:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-February/091612.html
Q2: given that TSILO depends on the users' location you h
Hi Slava,
if I understand correctly your scenario,
you could call t_on_failure before relaying the MESSAGE. In this way you
should have access to the original message in the failure route triggered
after receiving a final reply and you should be able to store it with the
regular msilo functions.
Ho
Igor Olhovskiy" wrote:
> Tried ti call
> ts_store also after t_relay - does not helps…
>
> 2016-10-27 17:49 GMT+03:00 Igor Olhovskiy :
>
>> Hi!
>> I’m trying to implement scheme much like Federico Cabiddu is described
>> here
>> https://www.youtube.com/w
Hi Alex,
I had the same problem as you and I couldn't find a way to selectively
reply to via.
What I ended up doing is the following dirty trick...
Before a transaction is created for the processed message I do:
if (SOME CONDITION) {
remove_hf_value("Via[-1].rport");
msg_apply_chan
Hi,
are you sure that on server 2 you are running 4.4 branch?
The three params version of the query has been removed in master in this
commit
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/61adc6e16c73070bd3f8a9a04efa18263793a270
.
Setting the query's body is now done through the $http_req pseudovaria
Hi,
you may use sqlops module for executing queries from routing script:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/sqlops.html
Cheers,
Federico
On 17 Sep 2016 13:38, "Angel Elena" wrote:
> Hi, good moorning.
>
> I have a Kamailio 4.0 with avp module working.
>
> Now, I need write some
Hi this should be better documented. I'll update the documentation
accordingly.
On the other hand I see that you are using in the config http_set* and
http_append_header
functions.
I'd suggest to use the $http_req pseudovariable for the same purpouse (
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/mod
Hi,
did you create the transaction before calling http_async_query?
If not, the function switch to non-transactional context, the script
execution is not stopped (you should notice it in your logs if the log line
after the function call is printed) and the callback function creates a
fake message t
The issue with dispatcher is that, in case of TCP transport, you cannot set
the sending socket for the same reason.
Basically, each time a client TCP socket is open by Kamailio, the SO select
the port, due to the lack of support for SO_REUSEPORT.
Cheers,
Federico
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:33 PM,
Hi,
about this subject: linux kernel starting from 3.9 introduced SO_REUSEPORT
which allows reusing TCP sockets.
It could be interesting supporting this in Kamailio. I worked on a patch
for this, I can open a PR and start a discussion if you think it's worth.
Regards,
Federico
On Thu, Sep 8, 201
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Agalya RAMACHANDRAN
wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I am Agalya and I work for Comcast. We are trying to use kamailio as proxy
> server for our project.
> I have a query regarding the same. We are trying to use REST API calls
> asynchronously from the config file.
> I s
;Nahum Nir" wrote:
> Hello Fredrico,
>
> Please see the attached cfg. I tried to add the fragments you published
> and to add a suspension at SENDPUSH but I am getting Desitnation Unknow.
>
> Thank you so much,
> Nir
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Federico Cab
Hi,
to set the timeout for a specific transaction you can use tm module
function t_set_fr (
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_set_fr).
For example you could call it before suspending the transaction setting a
short timeout and then call it again in the reply route wh
Hi Giovanni,
thanks for testing and reporting. I will prepare a PR for this.
About your solution I do agree with it, simple and effective :)
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:20 AM, gmele wrote:
> Hello Federico,
>
> your patch seems to work for us. Thx.
>
> For the 2 registrars needi
Hi Giovanni,
glad that I could help you :)
About your questions:
sip.instance:
I've pushed in a branch (
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/tree/grumvalski/ts_append-instance) a
change in tm t_append_branches function. Can you give it a try and let me
know how it works for you? The change is rea
Hi Giovanni,
when I suggested to disable sip.instance, really I meant in the client,
since I know that linphone has an option for this.
Anyway the problem is not due to your patch.
If your registrar is behind a proxy, you have to enable the support for the
Path header in the registrar module (
http
Hi Giovanni,
are you using sip instances and the client reconnecting is the same?
There is currently a limitation in the module which prevent it from working
with sip.instance, I had in mind to fix it since a while but I still
haven't found the time to work on it.
If it's the case, try not using si
Hi Giovanni,
tsilo module has a parameter to specify if store the transaction with or
without the domain part of the ruri:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tsilo.html#idp45289468.
By default is disable so it will use the user part only.
Regards,
Federico
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at
Hi Joel,
to the extract the username part of the last Diversion header you could
modify your last example like this:
$(hdr(Diversion)[-1]{nameaddr.uri}{uri.user})
Regards,
Federico
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Joel Serrano | VOZELIA
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you receive an INVITE with 2 diversi
ers again while there is already an ongoing branch for
the same contact, tsilo won't append a new branch for it, so it is safe to
register while there is a stored transaction.
Lots of questions, but it is not easy to handle phones and desktop clients….
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
Giovanni
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Federico Cabiddu
> *Sent:* vendredi 10 juin 2016 10:48
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] TM Module t_suspend question
>
>
>
Hi,
for this kind of scenarios I'd suggest to use the TSILO module which have
been thought for mobile multidevice scenarios:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tsilo.html.
Basically what you can do is: send the INVITE to the desktop phone, store
the transaction, send the push to wa
Hi Andrey,
you can disable dialog timeout reset either globally (
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dialog.html#dialog.p.timeout_noreset)
or on a per-dialog basis (
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dialog.html#dialog.f.dlg_set_property
).
Cheers,
Federico
On Tu
Never tried, but looks like it could work, at least in the "modern" code.
Cheers,
Federico
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> This can probably still be "overridden" manually in a failure_route[],
> even though it's not the prettiest option. e.g.
>
> failure_route[1] {
>
My pleasure Alex :)
See you in Berlin!
Federico
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Federico,
>
> Very nice find! Subtle, inspired! I had figured it as a module quirk
> rather than a standards-mandated behaviour. Now that you mention it, I do,
> of course, remember seeing t
Hi Alex,
RFC 3261, section "6. Choosing the best response" states:
"A proxy which receives a 503 (Service Unavailable) response
SHOULD NOT forward it upstream unless it can determine that any
subsequent requests it might proxy will also generate a 503.
In other words, forwarding a 503 means that
Hi,
if I understand correctly your problem is that the first INVITE for a
specific URI will go to a server and the conference will be instantiated
there. Then you must route all the INVITEs from the other participants to
the same server, is it right?
If this is the case why not use algorithm 3 in d
Hi,
you cannot change Kamailio's memory at runtime, you have to stop and
restart it passing the new values. Depending on the distribution you're
using, the values read by startup scripts can be in different places
(/etc/default/kamailio being common one for debian like distribution).
About Kamailio
Hi,
xlog documentation:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/xlog.html
Kamailio routing script basic example:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/etc/kamailio-basic.cfg
Regards,
Federico
On 10 Mar 2016 6:51 p.m., "Shiv Patidar" wrote:
> please give me any reference
Hi,
I'm not a fan of the idea of having a B2B implemented in Kamailio, but at
the same time I agree with Alex's reasons for having it, so I give a +1 to
this.
Cheers,
Federico
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Fred Posner wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 12:45 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wa
S. Yuriev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, but why not to check has_totag again? Why we need a flag?
>
> --
> Wbr, Serge via mobile
>
> 03.03.2016, 09:31, "Federico Cabiddu" :
>
>
> Hi,
> $dlg_var is not available at this stage of the dialog:
>
>
Hi,
$dlg_var is not available at this stage of the dialog:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dialog.html#idp19330392
To achieve your goal you can use there an avp or a flag, which are bound to
transactions.
Something like:
#define INIT_FLAG
if (is_method("INVITE") && !has_totag
Hi,
a solution in this case could be making usage of Path header (
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3327).
You have to load the path module
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/path.html
and enabled its usage in registrar module
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/reg
Hi,
I'm going to be there too.
It would be nice to have some drinks/food together.
Regards,
Federico
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ok, let's see how many we are going to be and then decide how to do it
> (if we are not a large group, we can just g
Hi,
the commit
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6bdddb99d7bca42897b2c0f96a87c49b97efd8ac
solves the issue.
It has been cherry-picked to 4.2 branch and it's included in version 4.2.7.
Regards,
Federico
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Vasiliy Ganchev
wrote:
> Hi folk!
>
> sorry for f
Hi Michael,
a way could be to have two different dispatcher sets (one for each mvno).
Then you could store the dispatcher set associated to each user in the
usr_preferences table and use it in the routing script.
Something like this in your routing script:
avp_db_load("fU", "$avp(dispatcher-set)"
Hi,
have a look at utils module and its options_reply() function (
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/siputils.html#siputils.f.options_reply
).
In the documentation there is a kamailio configuration file snippet showing
how to use it.
Cheers,
Federico
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:01 PM,
Hi,
for this kind of operations you really have a lot of possible choices with
kamailio.
Some examples:
1) operating directly on $ru, since it is a r/w pseudovariable (
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/pseudovariables#ru_-_request_uri
)
2) use textops module's susbst_uri function
http:
Hi,
I've finally managed to understand what was causing the crash.
I've submitted a pull request with a proposal for a fix (
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/346).
Let's wait Daniel thoughts about it :)
Regards,
Federico
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, F
Hi Thibault,
there is no need for special decline handling when using tsilo, so the
default basic should work with the modifications you've done.
I tested your scenario with this config and I haven't been able to get the
crash. Could you please perform a test with debug level 3 and send me the
whol
ISTER]
> {
> if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) {
> setbflag(FLB_NATB);
> #!ifdef WITH_NATSIPPING
> # do SIP NAT pinging
> setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING);
> #!endif
> }
> if (!save("location"))
> sl_reply_error();
> route(PUSHJOIN);
> exit;
> }
>
> route[PUS
3, 31958, 32706, 0, 0, 0, 65535, 65535},
>
> addr =
> "%\203\326|\302\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\377\377\377\377"}}
>
> __FUNCTION__ = "relay_reply"
>
> #5 0x7fc27cda99d8 in fake_reply (t=0x7fc2761f2fc0, branch=3,
> code=408) at
then launching again the
> app, call is presented...
> Then waiting for call timeout.
> It works one or 2 times then call never timeouts on the client which
> initiates the call
> (which means Kamailio is dead and does not send 408 Timeout)
>
>
> 2015-09-10 19:33 GMT+02:00
When I get more time I will try to check again and see if those
> suppositions are valid. Meanwhile, maybe you can check as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 10/09/15 19:33, Federico Cabiddu wrote:
>
> Hi Thibault,
> have you tried last tsilo code from
Hi Thibault,
have you tried last tsilo code from 4.3.x branch?
Recently there has been a fix (
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6ce6803d57dabe287d7d6fa859e93c1df402d821)
for an issue that may be related to yours.
I'll keep investigating to see if I can spot something else. In the
meanwhi
Hi,
to achieve this you could use
modparam("ims_usrloc_scscf", "maxcontact", 1)
modparam("ims_usrloc_scscf", "maxcontact_behaviour", 2)
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, jyaim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an issue with mobile devices which get a different IP address
> each tim
Hi,
to achieve the described behavior you could call t_on_branch(BRANCH_NAME)
before calling t_relay.
In this way each branch, after forking and before being relayed, will
traverse the branch_route named BRANCH_NAME.
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_branch
Hope
43AA40]
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/vanrise-solutions> [image: Description:
> Description: cid:image008.png@01CDB760.3643AA40]
> <http://twitter.com/VanriseSolution>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@list
The ACK is stopping at Kamailio.
Be sure that you have loose_route management in kamailio script and that
the ACK is hitting it.
Something like
if (loose_route()) {
xlog("L_ERR", "route[MAIN]: call-id=$ci from=$fU to=$tU : attempt
to route with preloaded Routes");
if (is_method("AC
Hi,
in the INVITE going to the client there is no Record-Route header.
This means that the in-dilaog messages won't go through kamailio. In the
trace you are also missing the ACK for the INVITE for the same reason.
Be sure that in your kamailio script you are calling record_route().
Regards,
Fede
Hi,
I've been recently playing, with success, with kamailio IMS modules and the
examples *cscsf configuration files. Now I'm trying to implement qos but I
am stuck with diameter routing. Basically I can route Rx requests only if I
use "rx_forced_peer". In the other cases (Realm routing or default r
Hi Roberto,
I will try to post an example in the next days.
Regards,
Federico
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Roberto Fichera
wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 07:48 AM, Federico Cabiddu wrote:
>
> Ciao Federico,
>
> Hi Alex,
> the use case for which I wrote the module is the follo
Hi Alex,
the use case for which I wrote the module is the following. Suppose that
your service is mobile oriented and thus you are using "push" (APN, GCM or
custom one) mechanism to reach your customers' devices. The devices are not
registered most of the time, they do after receiving a push trigge
Hi,
you could use dispatcher's param "use_default" to achieve this:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.p.use_default
Regards,
Federico
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Would the below scenario be possible
Hi,
You can use the timeout_noreset parameter of the dialog module:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dialog.html#idp16963672.
Regards,
Federico
On 1 Jan 2015 17:27, "Kelvin Chua" wrote:
> Happy new year everyone! :)
>
> I have stumbled into a case where a switch would send a r
Hi,
currently the module depends on registrar module to append new branches:
basically it forces a lookup and update the dset for the transaction. So
adding the Contact(s) of the 302 (if I understand correctly what you want
to do) is not possible, maybe it could be a feature to add. As Daniel
sugge
Hi,
you can achieve this by using the flag 0x04 when calling save() function
from registrar module:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#idp1965144
Regards,
Federico
On 30 Sep 2014 10:54, "qw" wrote:
Hi,
I have one question about contact in kamailio.
Sometimes, one u
it.
Hope this helps.
CHeers,
Federico
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Nicholas Gill wrote:
> On 15/09/14 16:03, Federico Cabiddu wrote:
>
>> What happens if you call t_relay() after setting $du?
>>
> Same result. Kamailio sends 407 to caller, which then creates a new INVI
What happens if you call t_relay() after setting $du?
Cheers,
Federico
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Nicholas Gill wrote:
> On 14/09/14 20:00, sr-users-requ...@lists.sip-router.org wrote:
>
>> In your script snippets it seems
>> that upon receiving the 302, in the failure route you set the
Hi,
I'm not sure that I fully understand your scenario, there are things not
clear to me, like: who is sending the 407? In your script snippets it seems
that upon receiving the 302, in the failure route you set the $du and then
you pass the message to a RELAY route, which I suppose sends the 407 r
Hi,
you have to call the save() function with the flag 0x04.
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/registrar.html#idp1813984
Regards,
Federico
On 5 Apr 2014 10:03, "MrIhaveAnOpinionOnEverything"
wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> I am a newbie in kamailio. Basically I am looking for a
led.
>
> [1] http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/cnxcc.html
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Federico Cabiddu <
> federico.cabi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>> thank you for your answer.
>> I tried
Hi Daniel,
thank you for your answer.
I tried to catch the BYE with event_route[dialog:end] but I'm facing
another problem.
When the timeout for the dialog is reached Kamailio correctly sends a BYE
to the caller and to the callee but in the logs I see this:
DEBUG: dialog [dlg_timer.c:240]: start w
Hi,
from the log you pasted is clear that the problem is that kamailio is
starting before mysql.
This because, as you said, they have the same priority and so, being the
starting order alphabetical for the same priority, kamailio will start
before mysql and cannot connect to mysql which is still no
eone could check my results
> ?
> http://pastebin.com/6EY5VYeP
>
> Now I am getting Too Many Hops (483)
>
> 77.YY.YY.YY = IP from which client trying to register
> 77.XX.XX.XX = My Public IP
> 192.168.1.137 = Kamailio
>
> Thanks for all!
>
>
>
> 2011/4/7 fe
Hi,
try to sniff the traffic on your Kamailio server to see if SIP packets
are reaching the server or not and where, eventually, Kamailio is
sending the replies.
Regards,
Federico
2011/4/7 spama...@gmail.com :
> Thank you, Klaus for your prompt reply.
>
> Now Kamailio listens on local IP (192.16
een solved by a commit couple of months ago:
>
> http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/branches/1.5/modules/nathelper/nhelpr_funcs.c?r1=5884&r2=5995
>
> If does not work with latest SVN, let us know.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
>
> On 9/2/10 2:27 PM, federi
ater then the effective body
length body->len is corrected with the real value.
This solved for the moment, but I'm not sure if this is a good approach and
I still don't understand why in the test platform I cannot reproduce the
crash.
Regards,
Federico Cabiddu
__
78 matches
Mail list logo
