Hi, the commit https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6bdddb99d7bca42897b2c0f96a87c49b97efd8ac solves the issue. It has been cherry-picked to 4.2 branch and it's included in version 4.2.7.
Regards, Federico On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Vasiliy Ganchev <vancece...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folk! > > sorry for first sending to the wrong list ! > > > Currently playing around with push notification in kamailio, have a bad > case. > Would appreciate any idea. > > Scenario (all devices connected via TCP): > UA-A - sipphone, > UA-B[1] - sipphone > UA-B[2] - Linphone android > Server - kamailio+asterisk > > UA-A call UA-B (UA-B[1] - online, UA-B[2] - offline) > Kamailio make ts_store, and t_relay to UA-B[1], > for UA-B[2] kamailio send push notification > UA-B[2] appear registered, > I make ts_append, and see kamailio sending INVITE to UA-B[2], but tansport > used is UDP (expected TCP) > > If I use UDP on UA-B[2] - have no issue. > I am using kamailio-4.2.5, looked in sources of current master, did not > found changes that could help in my scenario. > > General question - does anyone has same problem using ts_append for TCP > connected devices? > If TCP in ts_append should work OK, any other idea? > > cheers! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/tsilo-and-linphone-android-connected-via-TCP-tp144224.html > Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
