Hi Daniel,
I'm also using letsencrypt since their beta program.
The only issue I see is that the certs expire after 90 days, which means
you will have to manually change them before those 90 days are up.
They have an automated process to get new certs and insert them in the
correct virtual hosts i
Thanks Daniel.
I was looking into this option
<http://nil.uniza.sk/ip-telephony/voip/kamailio-call-establishment-permission-rules>but
your suggestion seems to be cleaner.
Cheers,
Peter
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Friday 26 June 2015 13:26:05 Peter V
Hi,
Is it possible for Kamailio to restrict certain users (like in a group) to
only receive calls but never dial out or send SIP Simple messages outbound,
while allowing all other "regular" users to make outgoing calls and text
messages as well as receive them?
If so, which module do you guys rec
xcc-example
>
> //Gafar
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Abdul Gafar
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter
>>
>> Please use CNXCC PrePaid module
>>
>> //Gafar
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Peter Villeneuve
>> wrot
Hi,
I want to experiment with the following setup and was wondering which
module(s) you all recommend.
I have a working simple kamailio 4.2 setup where registered users can only
call each other on the same domain (ie no outbound calling to PSTN or other
domains).
Now I want to explore the possib
To reiterate. The issues seem to only popup on PHP versions greater than
5.4.
Everything below 5.5 (like your 5.3) should work as expected.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Virmantas Variakojis <
virmantas.variako...@lamoda.ru> wrote:
> Works fine for me with php 5.3
> 2014 gruod. 4
I can confirm there are issues with siremis and newer php versions.
I have seen problems with Siremis and PHP > 5.4.
In fact I reported that back in May in the sr-dev list but got no response.
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2014-May/024183.html
My errors were popping up with 5.5. I g
I also see a lot of those errors in my log files but I attributed them to
simple connection issues with mobile clients instead of anything specific
to TLS.
My reasoning is that if a mobile UAC changes networks, moves out of range,
etc, then TCP connections to that previous IP:port combo will fail,
, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Peter Villeneuve
wrote:
> Yup, that was it thanks.
>
> Now I'm back to my original problem. I just have 1 tls listener on 5061.
> I'm going to try and enable other transports and set the outbound proxy
> and see if that fixes it.
>
>
l 18, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Anthony Messina
wrote:
> On Friday, July 18, 2014 11:34:27 PM Peter Villeneuve wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I've been playing around with Anthony's config posted above, and I
> believe
> > I'm almost there getting msilo to wor
Hi again,
I've been playing around with Anthony's config posted above, and I believe
I'm almost there getting msilo to work properly, although it seems that
kamailio doesn't correctly recognize the callee is a local subscriber so it
rejects the message instead of storing it.
Shouldn't the is_subsc
ed also with UDP?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> > On 17/07/14 23:46, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
> > Well I've been experimenting with this for hours and still no joy
> > :( Hair pulling continues
>
>
> Peter, I'm trying to accom
Thanks Daniel.
UDP is the same story as TCP and TLS, unfortunately.
Looking through the logs, I see strange errors in parsing the contact
header when msilo prepares to send the notification back to 1000.
This is for the notification message that should have been sent back to
1000 after he sent a m
> for us.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hugh
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:
> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Peter Villeneuve
> *Sent:* 17 July 2014 13:10
> *To:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla; Kamailio (S
ch_rpc();
exit;
}
send_reply("403", "Forbidden");
exit;
}
#!endif
# Sample branch router
branch_route[BRANCH_ONE] {
xdbg("new branch at $ru\n");
}
# Sample onreply route
onreply_route[REPLY_ONE] {
xdbg("incoming reply\n");
#!ifdef WITH_NAT
if ((isflagset(FL
rla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can you watch the sip traffic on the network to see if the sip messages is
> sent out? You can use ngrep, like:
>
> ngrep -d any -qt -W byline "sip" port 5060
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/07/14 19:56, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
>
Hi Miguel,
Welcome. Unfortunately I'm still fairly new to kamailio too, and the
learning curve is pretty steep as you've no doubt discovered.
I'm also having problems with getiing msilo running properly, and I'm sure
it's just bad routing on my part, so please share if you do happen to get
the rou
Hi,
This is most likely a stupid mistake on my route config, but msilo
correctly stores messages for offline users, but when they come back
online, the message never arrives.
Looking through the debug logs indeed there is an error, with status 408,
which suggests kamaiio can't find a route to the
#x27;s the best way to do this?
Cheers,
Peter
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/07/14 19:55, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On my server, I have the option of using either Rtpengine for NAT
>> t
Hi,
On my server, I have the option of using either Rtpengine for NAT traversal
or pure TURN without rtpengine.
Rtpengine has the obvious plus that it only needs 1 public IP, while TURN
(with STUN) will need 2 public IPs, although that's not a problem in my
case.
Having said that, I'd like to tak
Hi guys,
I'm designing a new service for a client and I was wondering what your
opinion is of the 2 options I'm considering to separate users on the
server. Basically I want to create closed groups where each user can only
call and receive calls from members of the same group (single domain
insta
Sorry to hijack this thread, but I was trying to follow along (Kamailio
4.1.4) and everything seems OK except that when the offline user registers
and msilo attempts to deliver his messages, I get this "no corresponding
socket for af 2" error and the messages remain in the db.
I have TLS enabled in
ed, May 21, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 09:08 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
>
> Hi There,
>
> On 05/20/2014 09:15 PM, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
>
> Hi Roberto,
>
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Did you ever figure out how to do it?
> I'd be int
Hi Roberto,
Did you ever figure out how to do it?
I'd be interested too.
Cheers,
Peter
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 10:36 AM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> > On 04/16/2014 07:15 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >> On 04/16/201
Sorry to bug you, but I never got any feedback on this, and I can't get
msilo working.
Any hints/thoughts?
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Any thoughts on why t_on_failure("1") gives me the syntax error?
>
> Thanks
Hi Daniel,
Any thoughts on why t_on_failure("1") gives me the syntax error?
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Peter Villeneuve wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for replying.
>
> This is how I added msilo to the kamailio default config. It still doesn't
>
t;
};
log(1,"MSILO:the downstream UA doesn't support MESSAGEs\n");
# we have changed the R-URI with the contact address, ignore it now
if (m_store("$ou"))
{
log("MSILO: offline message stored\n");
t_reply("202", "
Hi,
Can someone share a working msilo config for 4.1.1?
I've tried following older tutorials out there but they no longer seem to
apply.
I just want to test out msilo with the default kamailio config in 4.1.1,
but the current example in
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/msilo.html d
28 matches
Mail list logo
