Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-30 Thread John Smith
; From: Klaus Darilion > Sent: 01/23/14 08:12 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT > > On 23.01.2014 10:29, John Smith wrote: > > Hello Klaus, > > > > I had already two sockets bound each to two independent phy

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-30 Thread John Smith
Hello Andrew, I did not know this function. I am using it to determine the direction of the flow. Thank you > - Original Message - > From: Andrew Pogrebennyk > Sent: 01/24/14 06:51 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT > > On 01/23/2

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-30 Thread John Smith
Hello Fred, calls are being bridged across two interfaces: one natted from the outside with one public IP and one directly connected to the Asterisk. > - Original Message - > From: Fred Posner > Sent: 01/24/14 06:55 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users]

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-23 Thread John Smith
Kamailio. Thank you for your help > - Original Message - > From: Klaus Darilion > Sent: 01/23/14 12:26 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT > > Am 21.01.2014 17:33, schrieb John Smith: > > The next test

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-21 Thread John Smith
in the NATMANAGE block? > > > > Thank you > > > >> - Original Message - > >> From: Klaus Darilion > >> Sent: 01/21/14 05:25 AM > >> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > >> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT > >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-21 Thread John Smith
Using advertised IP address in manage_rttproxy would work with unpatched rtpproxy? Thank you > - Original Message - > From: Klaus Darilion > Sent: 01/21/14 05:18 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT > > On 21.01.2014 12:27, Fred Posn

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-21 Thread John Smith
then rewrite via rtpproxy_offer in the NATMANAGE block? Thank you > - Original Message - > From: Klaus Darilion > Sent: 01/21/14 05:25 AM > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT > > On 21.01.2014 13:24, John Smith wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-21 Thread John Smith
e you > will experience audio problems. > Are the asterisk RTP ports enabled/forwarded on your firewall? > > Regards, > > Kostas > > On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:24 PM, John Smith wrote: > > > Hi Fred, > > > > I have followed your HOWTO and the scenario

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-21 Thread John Smith
Hi Fred, I have followed your HOWTO and the scenario remains exactly the same. I see traffic from Phone1 IP to Kamailio private IP, from Kamailio private IP to Asterisk IP, and back directly to Phone2 public IP. I might be making wrong assumptions regarding this traffic flow. Is that correct?

[SR-Users] Kamailio behind NAT

2014-01-21 Thread John Smith
Hello, I am currently deploying one Kamailio behind NAT with one Asterisk as explained in the Asipto KB (Kamailio 4.0.x and Asterisk 11.3.0 using Asterisk Database http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb ). The structure is deployed as described in that docume