ion: 0
> local: 1
> }
>
> Server B only can see itself:
>
> {
> host: 172.112.10.243
> port: 5060
> resolved_ip: 172.112.10.243
> status: 2
> last_notification: 0
> local: 1
> }
>
> This behavior keeps the same after the ne
Hello,
DMQ will remove nodes from its internal list if they fail to respond to its
pings - with the exception of the original notification peer specified in
config. This way, if the network connection is lost, DMQ will continue to
try the original peer indefinitely until connectivity is restored,
Hello,
There were minimal DB changes between 4.3 and 4.4 - if you're using one of
the affected modules then you'll need to update the schema and version as
described here:
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/4.3.x-to-4.4.0
(Also note the dialog-ng module name change.)
Other than that,
Hey Olle,
On 11 Oct 2016 10:54, "Olle E. Johansson" wrote:
>
>
>> On 11 Oct 2016, at 09:46, José Seabra wrote:
>>
>> Hi Charles,
>> Sorry for my late reply.
>> I have tried that parameter but seems that for the dmq FQDN kamailio
doesn't send a NAPTR query.
>> Even for the SRV query, the kamailio
Hello,
That depends entirely on what you need to replicate between servers. DMQ is
just a communication channel. How you use it is up to you.
For example, if you enable dmq_usrloc, there's no need to share a location
database. Htable has an option for replicating over dmq too.
The number of dire
Hi José,
On 21 September 2016 at 18:28, José Seabra wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a doubt related with DMQ dns behavior, I noticed that when kamailio
> starts, it tries to resolve DMQ name configured on parameter
> notification_address as the following sequence:
>
>1. SRV
>2. A
>3.
>
Hi,
On 22 September 2016 at 14:08, José Seabra wrote:
> Hi charles,
> Inline
> Thanks
>
> 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
>
>> Hi José,
>>
>> In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node.
>> This can be in the form
resolves to all IP addresses associated with the host. This includes
> addresses from DNS SRV records, A and records.
>
> *Default value is “0”.*
>
> Thank you
> Cheers
> José
>
>
>
> 2016-09-22 13:28 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
>
>> Hey,
>>
>
?
Cheers,
Charles
> Thank you for your great job.
>
> BR
> José Seabra
>
> 2016-09-22 8:33 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I can take a look today.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Charles
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2016 06:20, "Daniel
Hello,
I can take a look today.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 Sep 2016 06:20, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess that the one who did the implementation of the srv query for dmq
> hasn't "allocated" any service name. I haven't looked at the sources, but I
> guess it should be a sma
Hi,
You should probably check out TM docs - specifically failure route (
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_failure)
and t_is_expired (
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_is_expired).
>From there you can do what you like.
Cheers,
Charle
:03:14 P172 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[14013]: ALERT:
> [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 14031 exited by a signal
> 11
>
> Mar 25 06:03:14 P172 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[14013]: ALERT:
> [main.c:742]: handle_sigs(): core was generated
>
> Mar 25 06:03:14
Hello,
Which version are you running?
Can you provide a gdb backtrace?
Cheers,
Charles
Hello All,
I am running two instances of kamailio and using dmq.
Kamailio starts good. However one of the node shutsdown unexpectedly.
Unsure what is going wrong. Please let me know what could be wrong. belo
s
On 3 Mar 2016 7:00 pm, "Alex Balashov" wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 01:58 PM, Charles Chance wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> The function was primarily intended for onward replication of successful
>> REGISTERs, rather than transactional state.
>>
>&g
Hi Alex,
The function was primarily intended for onward replication of successful
REGISTERs, rather than transactional state.
Assuming the function was available for replies, how do you anticipate
handling them on the standby node(s)?
Cheers,
Charles
On 3 Mar 2016 17:33, "Alex Balashov" wrote:
hov wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 11:29 AM, Charles Chance wrote:
>
>> In the first instance, you could use dmq_is_from_node() to determine if
>> the message is a replicated one and if so, don't relay.
>>
>> There's no specific function to check the state of other no
he message has just been replicated by the primary server then
it's safe to assume it's in service, right?
Cheers,
Charles
On 3 March 2016 at 16:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 11:09 AM, Charles Chance wrote:
>
> Yes, you are correct. It simply wraps the stand
Hi Alex,
Yes, you are correct. It simply wraps the standard t_replicate() function,
replicating the original request to every other node (first appending a new
branch for each). Use case is essentially the same as the original but
having the benefit of not having to define destination(s) staticall
s ok to backport. To me it looks like making that dmq location
> replication work, because removing a contact is part of the normal
> registration processing, so personally I am fine backporting.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 10/09/15 12:49, Charles Chance wrote:
>
> Of c
me other backports, it will take a while to read the whole thread and
> figure out the details -- sometime looking at code is faster to decide is a
> new feature or not.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 10/09/15 11:26, Charles Chance wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Do you ha
Hi Daniel,
Do you have a moment to comment on this related question:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2015-September/030663.html?
Cheers,
Charles
On 10 Sep 2015 08:21, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> short note to remind that today kamailio v4.3.1 will be released. If
2550 "kelvin", len = 6}
> ruid = {s = 0xb92a10 "uloc-55dffbe9-258b-1", len = 20}
> c = {s = 0xb92aa0
> "sip:kelvin@192.168.1.120:5060;alias=4x.1x8.62.213~5060~1",
> len = 56}
> received = {s = 0xb92b60 "", len = 0}
> path =
I will backport to 4.3.
Cheers,
Charles
On 18 August 2015 at 06:00, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> yes, same crash
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> There were some issues fixed si
es on usrloc_sync.c
> -- crash
> i tried changing save("location") -- crash
>
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not sure why, but the dmq
Expires:: deleted
> Callid:: 559751939@192.168.1.120
> Cseq:: 30
> User-agent:: qutecom/rev-g-trunk
> Path:: 2.4.6.8:5060>
> State:: CS_DIRTY
>
not show anything
>>
>>
>>
>> i used ngrep to trace the KDMQ packets, i can see the frequent exchanges
>> but nothing related to usrloc. am i doing something wrong?
>>
>>
>> Kelvin Chua
>>
>>
>>
, from another kamailio instances through dmq module?
>
> Best Regards
> --
> Cumprimentos
> José Seabra
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http:
Hi,
This is expected. The point of DMQ is to enable dynamic scaling without
having to define every node in advance in Kamailio config.
You should not use dmq_is_from_node() with dmq_handle_message() - it is not
intended to be a security check for KDMQ messages, but for other messages
replicated d
Hi,
It seems to me like another bug, although again I'm not familiar with the
module so can't be sure without looking that it is not intended behaviour.
I plan to look later this week when I have some time but in the meantime,
you can send me the examples directly if you like.
Cheers,
Charles
:"sip:212.2.160.202:61270
> ","path":"","callid":"rvOjXlyhAGK1aokNbR859w..","user_agent":"Z
> 3.7.30891
> r30851","instance":"","expires":1435779765,"cseq":6,"flags":0,&qu
Hello,
Should be no need to load any additional deserializer. The docs simply mean
if you wish to send/receive your own messages from within a module or
script, it's up to you to choose the best payload type and method of
(de)serialization.
Can you post an example KDMQ message here to look at?
C
Hello,
Thanks for the suggestion.
Callbacks for change of node state can be added easily enough and I agree
they could be quite useful to other modules.
Development is frozen currently but I can push to a separate branch if
you're interested in testing?
Cheers,
Charles
On 24 Apr 2015 13:42, "V
Hi Volkan,
It is in the master (development) branch, so will appear in the next major
release (4.3).
The code could not be backported to 4.2 because it was considered a new
feature rather than a fix.
Cheers,
Charles
P.S. please use mailing list in case the question is useful to others :-)
On
Hello,
Since you are sharing location database, you might consider using Path.
Cheers,
Charles
On 15 Mar 2015 08:52, "Niraj Roy" wrote:
> Hi,
>Here is the setup I have configured.
> --Two Kamailio K1, K2 Works as a registrar and call load balancer
> -- Three freeswitch works as the me
t;
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Bob,
>>
>> It is only possible to specify one notification address. So it is
>> important to make sure it points initially to an active node.
>>
>>
Hello Bob,
It is only possible to specify one notification address. So it is important
to make sure it points initially to an active node.
Once it has joined the cluster, the active node list is shared between all
servers, so it should not matter which servers are up or down later.
But for now,
Ok, you should report the cnxcc issue separately if required.
For now, I have pushed the patch to master branch but will also backport to
4.2 later.
Cheers,
Charles
On 6 February 2015 at 10:59, Leonardo Arena wrote:
> On ven, 2015-02-06 at 09:37 +0000, Charles Chance wrote:
> >
>
On 6 Feb 2015 09:27, "Leonardo Arena" wrote:
>
> On gio, 2015-02-05 at 09:29 +, Charles Chance wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 5 Feb 2015 09:18, "Leonardo Arena" wrote:
> > > I saw the patch on sr-dev. Thanks!
> > >
> >
>
Hi,
On 5 Feb 2015 09:18, "Leonardo Arena" wrote:
>
> On mer, 2015-02-04 at 21:15 +, Charles Chance wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 3 Feb 2015 10:07, "Leonardo Arena" wrote:
> > >
> > > On lun, 2015-02-02 at 17:54 +, Charles Chance
Hi,
On 3 Feb 2015 10:07, "Leonardo Arena" wrote:
>
> On lun, 2015-02-02 at 17:54 +, Charles Chance wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Can you send the output of "kamcmd dmq.list_nodes" (mask IP addresses
> > if needed)?
>
> proxy2:/et
Hi,
Can you send the output of "kamcmd dmq.list_nodes" (mask IP addresses if
needed)?
I will try to replicate your scenario and come back with a solution shortly.
By the way, your dmq "notification_address" parameter looks slightly odd
(although I don't know what you're doing with DNS) - it shou
s.
Regards,
Charles
On 19 January 2015 at 07:05, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
>
>
> I’ve looked at the htable and dmq modules, but I don’t understand how to
> integrate this with the dialog module.
>
>
>
> Could you post an example please?
>
Hello,
>
> hmm, I thought there was already a patch from Alex Hermann, might be just
> early for me here and that was just in the plans, because he changed how
> the profiles are stored to allow mixing from different servers.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 16/01/15 12:23, C
Hello,
Currently, this is work in progress. But in the meantime, it is possible to
achieve using htable with dmq enabled.
I can post an example later if required.
Cheers,
Charles
On 16 Jan 2015 07:54, "Grant Bagdasarian" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’m using the dialog module to control the maxi
gt;s.s,avp_value.s.s,avp_value.s.len);
>>
>> It is for 4.1.
>>
>> I have some ongoing work to commit soon on the master branch. if you
>> confirm it is working fine, I will push this patch as well and backport to
>> 4.1.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>
Hi Daniel,
The patch has tested OK so far.
Regards,
Charles
On 22 August 2014 12:37, Charles Chance
wrote:
> Thanks, Daniel.
>
> It can be hours, days or weeks between occurrences, but I will report
> back after a day or two initially then continue to monitor.
>
> C
Alex,
Thanks for expanding in such detail. I appreciate you taking the time to
fix the things that I missed. Sometimes I think it may have been easier to
start from scratch ;)
Best regards,
Charles
On 25 Aug 2014 10:11, "Alex Hermann" wrote:
> On Friday 22 August 2014, Charles
discuss before going to implement the mechanism. There are two
> > major aspects to care of:
> >
> > A) Distribution, I thought of two options for it:
> >
> > 1) using dmq module to publish the operations done with local profiles
> > (add/remove) -- this seems
gt; str_list);
> list_current->s.len = avp_value.s.len;
> memcpy(list_current->s.s,avp_value.s.s,avp_value.s.len);
>
> It is for 4.1.
>
> I have some ongoing work to commit soon on the master branch. if you
> confirm it is working fine, I will p
Hi All,
I wonder if some one could help me to diagnose a recurring issue?
It happens at random times/intervals and under varying load. But always,
just before the time of crash, I see the same critical error in log:
CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:841]: log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 6 in
state
Hi Gary,
That's good to hear.
Best regards,
Charles
On 29 Apr 2014 13:37, "Gary Wallis" wrote:
> On 4/28/2014 17:54, Charles Chance wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Maybe try http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/htable.html?
>>
>> Regards,
&
Hi,
Maybe try http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/htable.html?
Regards,
Charles
On 28 Apr 2014 21:26, "Gary Wallis" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Moving away from OpenSIPS...
>
> How can I replace the functionality that
>
> loadmodule "cachedb_local.so"
>
> gives in Kamailio 4.1?
>
> It is
Hi,
To my knowledge, only confirmed dialogs are ever persisted to the database.
Regards,
Charles
On 28 April 2014 15:10, Ivan Baques Garcia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1), but only confirmed dialogs are
> shown in the database.
>
> How I can enable to show uncon
e case slightly, someone may be able to suggest
another way to achieve it.
Regards,
Charles
On 2 February 2014 15:40, John Murray wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Thanks For that.
>
> How do I get the callid from a call in a specific profile if it is stored
> in memory?
>
> Regards.
&
Hi John,
>
> >What db_mode are you using for dialog module?
>
> Mode 5. I Don't need to persist the dialog state so means table
maintained in memory and not flushed to disk until shutdown but I can
access it through normal avp_db_query right?
Do you mean mode 3? Anyway, avp_db_query is for readin
John,
What db_mode are you using for dialog module? Are the entries in the db if
you check manually?
Are you able to fetch other data using avp_db_query? And do you see any
errors in the log?
Regards,
Charles
On 1 Feb 2014 16:24, "John Murray" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am managing calls with
Hi Volkan,
You probably should take a look at the Path module. For UACs behind NAT,
the INVITEs should be proxied via the server with which the client is
registered.
Best regards,
Charles
On 23 January 2014 21:41, Volkan Oransoy wrote:
> First of all thank you for your replies.
>
> I think
Hello,
Perhaps DNS SRV is what you are looking for? See
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record for more info.
Regards,
Charles
On 15 Jan 2014 22:52, "Owais ul Haq" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a kamailio server deployed along with an internet connection and
> database (on a seperate server t
And to you, Daniel.
Season's greetings to one and all!
Cheers,
Charles
On 24 Dec 2013 20:28, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Almost done with another fruitful year, counting two major releases, the
> first edition of a dedicated conference for Kamailio and presence at over a
> dozen event
Hi,
> In dialog module no functions to create/destroy dialogs, they described
> and used in tm module. Do you plan move dialog creation/destroying
> funcs in dialog module? I think it will more usable for replication:
> use same functions for create dialog in tm module (when real sip
> dispatch) a
Hi,
On 9 Dec 2013 07:45, "Victor V. Kustov" wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Can I create dialog structures via dmq?
>
Not yet, but it is work in progress and will be possible soon.
> for example, two K. share IP via carp. Active K. (carp master) process
> calls, create dialogs and send it to slave. When
so, in this case also i need to
> configure Rtp proxy or mediaproxy ?
> if so, which proxy to use (either Rtpproxy or mediaproxy) with kamailio
> server ?
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wr
library.
> Is that is enough ? with that i can load msrp module in kamailio.config
> and continue ?
>
> or should i have to install kamailio from sources ?
>
> Thank you
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wro
Hi,
Is the msrp module not included already in the core kamailio package?
Regards,
Charles
On 24 Oct 2013 08:26, "Wingsravi R" wrote:
> Dear Kamailio'ns,
>
> I have Installed kamailio V 4.0.3 from Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) repository
> and running successfully.
> now i have to work around MSRP r
MI. It must match a URL to which the
> RPC is bound.
>
> Is this referring to the binrpc modparam?
>
> ** **
>
> Any tips?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:
> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Charl
():
> handle_stream read: eof on /tmp/kamailio_ctl
>
> 8(11010) DEBUG: ctl [../../io_wait.h:617]: io_watch_del(): DBG:
> io_watch_del (0x7f9211dab440, 11, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:
> sr-users-boun...
> Content-Type: text/html
>
> Server: kamailio (4.0.2 (x86_64/linux))
>
> Content-Length: 2095
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:
> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Charles Chance
> *Sent:* Friday, Septembe
vp(dsdst)")
>
> modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(dsgrp)")****
>
> modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(dscnt)")
>
> modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_avp", "$avp(d
s-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:
> sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Grant Bagdasarian
> *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2013 10:04 AM
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Communicate with Kamailio through external
> application**
Hi,
Take a look at
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/xhttp_rpc.html, which
allows you to receive/handle RPC commands over HTTP.
Then use the appropriate RPC command in dispatcher module to reload table:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#idp16998
Hi,
Maybe priority?
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#idp15199200
Regards,
Charles
On 18 September 2013 09:02, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ** **
>
> Is it possible to store the weight attribute in the dispatcher table? If
> so, which column must
this way, when an INVITE reaches a proxy it'll do a lookup() and then
> t_relay() to the appropriate registrar, right?
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter - calling msg_apply_changes() after
ly_changes()) until the message left Kamailio too?
>>>
>>> If that is the case, and msg_apply_changes() is called, doesn't that
>>> mean the Path: header from add_path() would be added in that scenario?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 September 2013 14:49,
is called, doesn't that mean
>> the Path: header from add_path() would be added in that scenario?
>>
>>
>> On 16 September 2013 14:49, Charles Chance > > wrote:
>>
>>> It is possible if the edge proxy and registrar are separate, as you say.
>>&
any reason it isn't possible?
>
>
> On 16 September 2013 14:21, Charles Chance
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, you are right - and I agree, it would be better if this was possible
>> :)
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On
Hi Brian,
Another tip, if you do share the same database, make sure the clocks are in
sync ;)
Cheers,
Charles
On 16 September 2013 14:22, Brian Wallen wrote:
> Thanks for the tips guys. I'll try them out today and report back.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:21 A
istrar.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 16 September 2013 14:05, Charles Chance
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This sounds like a case for sharing same database, and adding Path before
>> saving incoming register. That way, no need to replicate register
Hi,
This sounds like a case for sharing same database, and adding Path before
saving incoming register. That way, no need to replicate register message
to other servers and all subscribers use the same domain.
Add path something like this before calling save():
append_hf(
Another thing, you do have bindport=5080 in your sip.conf, don't you?
Regards,
Charles
On 14 September 2013 13:42, Charles Chance wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> What is the output of the following commands on Asterisk machine?
>
> netstat -lnp | grep asterisk
> iptables -L
ue thats got me baffled.
>
> Regards
> Mick
> On 14 Sep 2013 09:08, "Charles Chance"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could be something network related, or firewall? I know you stated phones
>> could register directly to Asterisk but if nothing is showing i
Hi,
You describe what you are trying to achieve, but not the result you are
seeing.
One thing I noticed is that in your failure route you set
t_on_failure("DISPATCH"), but should it not be t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH")?
Regards,
Charles
On 14 Sep 2013 08:33, "Joseph Watson"
wrote:
> Hello Eve
Hi,
Could be something network related, or firewall? I know you stated phones
could register directly to Asterisk but if nothing is showing in Asterisk
SIP log, then the requests are never getting to it.
Was your trace performed on Kamailio server or Asterisk?
Cheers,
Charles
On 13 September
ello,
>>
>> I want to announce that a new person got developer GIT write access to
>> repository: Charles Chance.
>>
>> He is for long time in the community, sending patches in the past to
>> modules such as memcache. His immediate goal is to care of dmq module,
&g
ds,
> Carsten
>
> 2013/9/9 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> > Hello,
> >
> > not using this module, however, after you start, can you see a dedicated
> > timer module 'NT' if you do kamctl ps?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
>
Hi,
Not familiar with the specific module but it looks like a more general DNS
issue - do you have the correct DNS server(s) configured in resolv.conf?
Are you able to resolve other hostnames?
Regards,
Charles
On 7 Sep 2013 11:56, "Nandini madhu" wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am working on XMPP mod
Hi all,
Currently evaluating the nat_traversal module in some tests, and trying to
configure keepalives for registers. We currently use nathelper, but due to
the distributed nature of our setup, nat_traversal seems more appropriate
for the keepalive functionality (nathelper is sending keepalives f
Hello,
Is anyone able to confirm whether the cluster definition I provided should
indeed do what I think it should? If so, I will take a look further myself
to find the reason why not.
Thanks in advance,
Charles
On 20 Aug 2013 16:18, "Charles Chance"
wrote:
> Hi All,
&
Hi Jan,
Why not use sqlops to query the database from within your config script?
Best regards,
Charles
On 21 August 2013 13:36, Jan Gaida wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to obtain the number of subscribed watchers for a given
> presentity-uri.
>
> I can get it with a SQL Query like "select count
Hi All,
I'm having difficulties with the above module and can't see what I'm doing
wrong.
Config as follows:
modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "db01=>mysql://
> readwrite:passw...@db01.domain.com/kamailio")
> modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "db02=>mysql://
> readonly:passw...@db02.domain
> not sure if would be just simple backport and then it might be better just
> to upgrade to 4.0 instead of making 3.3 unstable.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 8/2/13 10:27 AM, Charles Chance wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Sorry if I missed it already, but did the fix t
Hi Daniel,
Sorry if I missed it already, but did the fix to clear early state dialogs
get backported in the end?
Cheers,
Charles
On 2 Aug 2013 09:17, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am considering to package soon a new version out of branch 3.3. If
> anyone has spotted fixes
to Kamailio, official tutorial did not cower all my
> questions.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards, Volodya Ivanets.
>
>
> 2013/7/11 Charles Chance
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Have you looked at
>> http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-
Hello,
Have you looked at
http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb?
Charles
On 11 July 2013 16:01, Володимир Іванець wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Recently I became interested in concept of putting couple of Asterisks
> servers in cluster. So I tried to repli
On 3 July 2013 17:25, Charles Chance wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Sounds perfect! I will try to test here tomorrow and let you know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles
>
>
> On 2 July 2013 22:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I pushed a patc
he SIP message was perfect fine with Bye signal, yet the
> dialog is still hang with state 1.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Sounds perfect! I will tr
Maybe patching the module is the only
> solution.
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> That doesn't work I'm afraid. Also from
>> http://www.kamailio.org/
gt; parse the info and tear down those unconfirmed dialogs using dlg_end_dlg:
>
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/dialog.html#id2524783
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Charles Chance <
> charles.cha...@sipcentric.com> wrote:
>
>> The paramet
when timeout is
reached?
On 2 July 2013 14:51, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
> There is, but for all dialogs, not only the unconfirmed ones.
>
>
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules_k/dialog.html#default-timeout-id
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Char
29207
...
Therefore, the unconfirmed dialogs never get cleared automatically, in my
experience at least. I hope I'm wrong though :)
Cheers,
Charles
On 2 July 2013 14:31, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Juli 2013, 14:23:25 schrieb Charles Chance:
> > I don't thi
Hi,
I don't think this will help at all, as regardless of DB mode, unconfirmed
dialogs are not stored in DB anyway.
The important thing to remember is that if you are calling dialog_manage()
in your config, to only do it once you are ready to forward the request. If
you call it but then exit for
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
