Hi,
I also believe the module needs to be marked somehow, because it's
implemented against a very old cassandra version and does not work with
recent versions at all.
I'm afraid a complete re-implementation from scratch is needed there,
because the protocol changed significantly. Also schema defi
Hi Alex,
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/ratelimit.html is
another approach here. Tried it as a proof of concept recently and it
seems to do its job.
Seems like pipelimit is derived from ratelimit. What's the main
difference from ratelimit, other than named pipes and DB support
Hi Lucian,
On 03/31/2016 01:36 PM, Lucian Balaceanu wrote:
> At 1&1 we actually haven't used db_cassandra, but were aware of some of
> its shortcomings (e.g. thrift interface).
> Do you consider Cassandra is stable and easy enough to maintain so as to
> use it as usrloc back-end? Are you
> also co
Hi Daniel,
On 03/31/2016 12:45 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> I haven't used Cassandra at all, maybe some of the devs at 1&1 can share
> if they have any plans or usage stats for it, being the initial
> developers of the module.
Let's see if someone chimes in. Not sure if Anca is still inv
Hi all,
I was checking db_cassandra with Kamailio 4.3 recently to try making it
work as a usrloc back-end, and my observation is that the module has
quite some issues.
In general, the module states that it's only tested with cassandra
1.0.6, which is really out-dated. I tried with the latest vers
Hi,
On 12/10/2015 01:33 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> I tested an approach in which all initial rtpengine_manage() calls (in
> support of a new SDP offer) were made in a branch_route[], and this
> appeared to work.
>
> Is this the 'orthodox' way to do it?
That's the way we're using it also.
Andrea
Hello Jorj,
On 03/03/2015 06:25 PM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>> One thing I can see is that neither of the devices send a SUBSCRIBE with
>> line-seize Event. They rather just subscribe to the call-info event, and
>> in the oubound INVITE, they don't send a Call-Info header either. Is
>> this mandatory fo
Hi Jori,
On 03/02/2015 02:47 PM, Jorj Bauer wrote:
>> User pho...@domain.org is registered on two devices A and B
>
>> kamcmd> sca.all_subscriptions
>> phone1 10.15.20.174:5100 call-info 2697 active
I had a mixed setup in my first test with one device registering as
private line and another one
Hi guys,
Playing with SCA for the first time, I'm hittin the following issue:
User pho...@domain.org is registered on two devices A and B, and device
B sends SUBSCRIBE to pho...@domain.org with call-info Event.
Subscription is handled properly, and my DB content is this:
id: 4
su
Hi,
On 08/11/2014 08:34 PM, Narsay, Deep wrote:
> Is there any way rtpengine can be configured to use same UDP port to
> receive and transmit RTP packets?
>
> The set up I'm trying is
>
> SIP_Client --> Kamailio/rtpengine --> Freeswitch
> InternetInternet LAN L
Hi,
There finally was some progress on the ice-lite issue in Firefox over
the last week or two (after the bug report got stuck for months), so I'd
expect Firefox nightly to properly work with ice-lice in a couple of
days or so.
Andreas
On 05/17/2014 02:30 AM, Alexey Rybalko wrote:
> Hi Richard!
Hi Daniel,
On 02/18/2014 10:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> starting with 4.1, you can have per branch failure routing block:
>
> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_on_branch_failure
Ha, we'll check if this is going to work for us, sounds good, thanks!
Jus
Hi,
What is the intended behaviour from a general point of view if you get a
1xx on one branch and a 30x on another branch for a parallel fork?
>From my understanding, the 30x is a final reply, so it's kept in tm
until all other branches are finished, then it enters failure-route with
the highest
Hi,
Seems like two ims module links (linked from
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/) are broken:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/ims_registrar_pcscf.html
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/ims_usrloc_scscf.html
The same for http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/,
Hi Vitaliy,
On 09/24/2013 12:45 AM, Vitaliy Aleksandrov wrote:
The patch only handles the case where a tcp connection is directly
made to the registrar, as no event route is fired, right?
You are right. Current version works only when registrar accepts tcp
connections.
Anyway it's a good idea t
Hi,
On 09/13/2013 11:27 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
thanks, patch was commited and pushed to remote repository.
The patch only handles the case where a tcp connection is directly made
to the registrar, as no event route is fired, right?
Andreas
_
Hi,
On 07/07/2013 11:19 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 10:01:28PM -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
Can we run it behind nat? I've really been eyeing that and desparate
to replace rtpproxy
Think twice ... trying to run something designed to avoid problems
with NAT beh
On 07/07/2013 04:01 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Can we run it behind nat? I've really been eyeing that and desparate
to replace rtpproxy
Yes, check advertised address option.
Andreas
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
Hi,
On 07/05/2013 11:56 PM, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote:
I can see that SDES-SRTP is supported but DTLS-SRTP is not mentioned.
Is it mean that there is no support for DTLS-SRTP? Any plan to support it?
It's planned (like ZRTP), just no specific time-line yet.
Andreas
___
Hi,
There've been a couple of questions regarding mediaproxy-ng as an
rtpproxy replacement on how to get it up and running with kamailio and
what it does compared to rtpproxy, mediaproxy and iptrtpproxy.
I hope, the README.md at
https://github.com/sipwise/mediaproxy-ng
answers these
Hi,
On 07/04/2013 09:00 AM, Khue Nguyen Minh wrote:
I am trying install module mediaproxy-ng, but, when I built module
"kernel-module" I got error:
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.32-279.22.1.el6.x86_64/build
M=/usr/local/src/mediaproxy_ngcp/mediaproxy-ng-master/kernel-module
O=/lib/modules/2.6.32-279.
Hi Peter,
On 07/01/2013 12:38 PM, Peter Dunkley wrote:
The "case PROTO_WS:" should go within the "#ifdef USE_TCP" conditional
and the "case PROTO_WSS:" should go within the "#ifdef USE_TLS" conditional.
I'll clean it up and commit to master.
Thanks for confirmation,
Andreas
_
Hi,
Any feedback on that? Looks like the patch below does its job, can
someone please confirm this is fine and actually as expected?
Andreas
On 06/27/2013 02:03 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
On 06/27/2013 12:54 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
$du = $null;
$fs = $null;
forward();
What I get is
Hi,
On 06/27/2013 12:54 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
$du = $null;
$fs = $null;
forward();
What I get is this error message:
Jun 27 12:30:53 spce lb[12104]: ERROR: [action.c:437]:
do_action(): ERROR: do action: forward: bad uri transport 5
Is there anything special I need to do? Does forward
Hi guys,
Maybe I'm missing something, but when I have a stateless lb with
websockets enabled, and I don't have mhomed set (meaning that I need to
set $fs manually), how would I set $du and $fs correctly, if $ru is for
example this:
sip:bo87fffs@h7h3rerhg50k.invalid;transport=ws
I tr
Hi,
On 06/21/2013 10:59 AM, José Luis Millán wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 'allow_trusted()' from Permissions module without a problem in
a Kamailio 4.0 routing logic. It does just work, but the MI command
'trusted_dump' tells me that the module is not in use:
Seems like there is an issue with the rpc
Hi,
On 05/01/2013 10:46 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
looked over the code and seems ok. The domain lock is set inside
ul.get_urecord_by_ruid(_d, ahash, &inst, &r, &ptr).
Ok, good to know.
Are you doing other operations in config with usrloc/registrar rather
than save()/lookup()? Any m
Hi Daniel,
On 04/30/2013 05:34 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
what version are you playing with? To look in the right branch when
troubleshooting first time, then look at the others that might be
affected...
The affected version is latest 3.3 branch, but the same code is there in
4.0 as
Hi,
We're hitting an issue in a deployment where all udp receivers are
sitting in FUTEX_WAIT caused by save() -> lock_udomain() and seem to
have deadlocked themselves every couple of days.
Looking at the code, enable_gruu in registrar is active by default, and
in lookup there is a code path
Hi,
We've seen this behaviour as well and worked around it using avp_subst
with regex, as we didn't have the time yet to investigate further.
But basically I can confirm this issue.
Andreas
On 04/30/2013 01:31 PM, Martin Mikkelsen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:29:21PM +0200, Martin Mikk
Hi,
On 04/29/2013 11:47 AM, Thilo Bangert wrote:
I'd just save one timestamp, ie TAI64 or as java does miliseconds since epoch,
in a single, new field. saving the timestamp in two fields seems messy.
Agreed.
miliseconds since epoch is probably preferable, since it can be converted to
human r
Hi,
On 04/29/2013 01:42 PM, Alex Hermann wrote:
On Monday 29 April 2013 11:05:36 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
1) store seconds.miliseconds as double - there is a patch (which
Please do not use floating point respresentations for values that will be used
in accounting. Floating point is imp
Hi Daniel,
On 04/23/2013 08:51 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
- the tm variable is declared set, but not used
- tz is also not used, gettimeofday() can take NULL as second parameter
and iirc, tz is obsolete
- I wonder if gettimeofday() can actually fail and return code should be
checked fo
Hi,
On 04/22/2013 07:34 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Details about going out can be printed on onsend_route. In this route
block, one can execute drop and nothing is sent to the wire. It can be a
config started with a special define specified with -A parameter.
Enabling debugger module w
Hi Uri,
On 04/23/2013 10:45 AM, Uri Shacked wrote:
can anyone tell me if it is possible to save the time and date using
accdb (mysql) with milisec as well? the field on the DB is set as TIMESTAMP.
We've opened a ticket on the bug tracker some months ago, but it's still
open at
http://sip-ro
Hi,
I'd like to put a topic up for discussion to test kamailio config logics.
The standard way of doing so is to start kamailio as usual and write
sipp or sipsak scenarios to perform automated tests. This can get quite
complex pretty quickly, as you always have to take care of covering the
fu
Hi,
On 04/10/2013 02:54 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
i consider it a bad idea to call the new media proxy mediaproxy-ng,
because it gives impression that this is a new incarnation of ag projects
mediaproxy that has existed for years.
mediaproxy-ng also exists for years (since 2007, prior to the re
Hi,
On 04/10/2013 11:02 AM, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote:
I think it is a bad idea to name the relay "mediaproxy-ng" and the
corresponding Kamailio module "rtpproxy-ng".
Indeed
Well, the point is that it's "just" an enhancement of the rtpproxy
module. In the past, the rtpproxy module was used
Hi,
On 04/08/2013 11:50 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
i would expect that loose_route() would set $du to received parameter
value, but it does not, because i get to syslog:
Apr 8 12:44:54 wheezy1 /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[5723]: INFO: Trying to relay to du
<> or ru
how can i tell p2 to set $du to rece
Hi,
On 04/02/2013 05:14 PM, Dani Popa wrote:
as far as i know, mediaproxy by AG Projects it's also kernel based
forwarding, so i don't understand what is the reasons to use another
mediaproxy let's say mediaproxy-ng.
Well, mediaproxy-ng development has started like 6 years ago as a
replacemen
Hi guys
Maybe I missed something, but looks like there is no base64
encode/decode transformation in PV, right?
I think we're going to add one, as it might be handy to do such
transformations directly from within the config file.
One case where this could be used is that some UAs are picky in
Hi,
On 03/18/2013 08:33 AM, Khoa Pham wrote:
I heard some people said that it is the ALG of some routers that modify
the SIP message, hence cause the errors
It's just guessing and consulting the magic crystal ball. Post your SIP
message which kamailio complains about as it is received on your
Hi,
On 02/21/2013 07:50 PM, Konstantin M. wrote:
Try to look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803827 and
http://forums.cpanel.net/f34/named-wont-start-284821.html#post1191151
As noted above, I've found the issue already, which was caused by
setting the lock-mem ulimit (the -l s
Hi Daniel,
On 02/21/2013 09:38 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
My curiosity now, what means the syslog message:
... t of memory [6720]
I guess the last is pid. Is it like just last part of "OUt of memory"?
Never had this message so far, iirc.
What I found through debugging is that this m
Hi,
On 02/20/2013 04:24 PM, Radek Wal wrote:
SEMS als SBC application.
You might want to check
http://www.sipwise.com/news/technical/byov-system-spce-as-sbc/ which
uses kamailio and sems to do exactly that.
Andreas
___
SIP Express Router (SER) a
Hi,
On 02/19/2013 11:26 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
On 02/19/2013 11:24 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Maybe some of you have encountered this funny error message when
starting and even killing kamailio on a Debian 6 with 2.6.x and 3.x
kernels and 2.11.3-4:
2.11.3-4 is the libc version, btw.
Oh
On 02/19/2013 11:24 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Maybe some of you have encountered this funny error message when
starting and even killing kamailio on a Debian 6 with 2.6.x and 3.x
kernels and 2.11.3-4:
2.11.3-4 is the libc version, btw.
Andreas
Hi,
Maybe some of you have encountered this funny error message when
starting and even killing kamailio on a Debian 6 with 2.6.x and 3.x
kernels and 2.11.3-4:
#-
# /usr/sbin/kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/proxy/kamailio.cfg -P
/var/run/kamailio/kamailio.proxy.pid -m 4 -M 1
Thanks for clarification, Daniel!
Andreas
On 02/19/2013 09:18 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 2/18/13 4:40 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi guys,
Nonces have a default expiry value of 300 seconds. Does this still
apply if the "secret" parameter is set? So can you use bo
Hi guys,
Nonces have a default expiry value of 300 seconds. Does this still apply
if the "secret" parameter is set? So can you use both "secret" and
"nonce_expire" value together, taking for granted that the time is in
sync over multiple proxies?
Andreas
Hi,
On 01/24/2013 11:52 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Since you claim that your cool stuff gets broken, I'd appreciate you
to come forward with an example, otherwise it's plain FUD.
I think you could really come up with a better demand in this
discussion, otherwise is clear misunderstand
Hi,
On 01/24/2013 06:35 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
What cool extensions would that be? I guess the sems guys would be
happy to fix it, if it breaks something unexpectedly.
well, see, you just hit your (business) head! Why I should share with
the sems guy the ideas about my cool featur
Hi,
On 01/24/2013 04:49 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
there is no need for an sbc and break the call in two legs and drop my
cool extensions I have in my softphone.
What cool extensions would that be? I guess the sems guys would be happy
to fix it, if it breaks something unexpectedly.
Hi Daniel,
On 01/24/2013 03:55 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
The latest version has support for using dialog to store the From/To
values, so no masking within rr param. It should work fine in your case,
I guess.
For earlier version, you can achieve more or less the same by storing
from/to
Hi,
This is a question for kamailio 3.0.x and I'm still trying to reproduce
this issue somehow for latest stable, but maybe it was a known issue
anyways which got fixed in newer versions, so I don't have to dig deeper
into this:
There is an INVITE "A -> kamailio -> B", and kamailio does
uac
Hi Daniel,
On 12/19/2012 07:24 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
You can use append_to_reply() from textops module:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/textops.html#AEN276
:-) I couldn't go over not to remark your good spot on the docs of the
7th older release by now - the 1.3.x - which is
Hi Olle,
On 12/19/2012 02:43 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Yeah, I already have Kamailio sending all kinds of crazy stuff while
testing a new platform,
using the UAC module. But I wanted to be lazy and change on the fly...
Evil stuff happening here. Kamailio is a good test-tool.
Now I fail to c
Hi,
On 12/19/2012 05:49 PM, Mino Haluz wrote:
I know how to use sl_send_reply, but I would like to add "Reason:"
header to the reply generated. Is there any command or variable for that?
You can use append_to_reply() from textops module:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/textops.html#AEN
Hi,
This might sound like a silly question, but why don't you use lookup()
instead? You can pass a PV also instead of just using $ru.
Andreas
On 12/17/2012 04:40 PM, Ali Jawad wrote:
Seems the logic I used is flawed, problem is not all of the sip clients
register their domain in the location
Hi Klaus and Ole,
On 12/03/2012 11:43 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Just use:
> @ IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "SIPS+D2T" "" _sips._tcp.example.com.
>
> I would interpret it as:
>
>SIPS+D2T
> | \
> | \
> secure + TCP --> TLS
Ok, this seems like a valid approach. I'll
Hi Klaus,
On 12/03/2012 10:15 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> The request URI should look like the one which the user enters. E.g. if
> user enters "sip:12...@example.com" then the request URI should be
> "sip:12...@example.com" - regardless of the transport protocol chosen by
> the transport layer.
>
ike there's no tomorrow...
It didn't bother me much until today where I realized there is no way to
properly indicate to a client that my server supports TLS. Or is there?
Andreas
On 12/01/2012 12:29 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Andreas Granig writes:
>
>> A lot of clients and se
Hi,
Hope to get some guidance here over the usage of "sips" and "sip plus
transport=tls" when following RFC3263.
The RFC3263 says that a NATPR record could return something like this
for a query like "host -t NAPTR example.com":
; order pref flags service regexp replacement
On 11/26/2012 06:49 PM, Spencer Thomason wrote:
> I'm running 3.3.2 @ commit bab07e07858464d50d310bbb52431a0b171ee771
Should be fixed here:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=3d195f2675569954a1f74128508db07cbc604ed9
Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Hi,
On 11/26/2012 06:25 PM, Spencer Thomason wrote:
> I'm attempting to dump the contents of the usrloc cache and I'm receiving the
> following error:
> sercmd> ul.dump
> error: 500 - Internal error creating aor struct
> sercmd> mi ul_dump
> error: 500 - Internal server error processing 's': buff
Hi Carsten,
On 11/19/2012 03:38 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
> I am using it with 3.2 in production for exactly that purpose
Seems to work like charm, thanks!
Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and
Thanks Olle and Carsten,
On 11/19/2012 03:27 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
> short question:
> Why don't you use a shared secret to create a nonce value?
>
> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/auth.html#auth.secret
I've noticed this "secret" parameter, but the documentation is a bit
brief
Hi David,
On 11/19/2012 02:54 PM, David J wrote:
> Is the database shared? If so maybe when they authenticate add a secure
> token to the header that the second proxy can use for auth?
No, the DBs are explicitely NOT shared in this scenario.
> Just a suggestion not sure if its the answer your lo
Hi,
There are lots of parameters controlling the creation of nonce values on
a server, and I'm curious if there is a way to kind of "sync" them
between servers.
The use case would be to have a UA send for example its registration to
Proxy1. Proxy1 would challenge it, UA will send the registration
Hi,
On 10/25/2012 02:51 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Is there a way in kamailio to statelessy forward a request without
>> putting its own Via header into the message? Consider an example where a
>> stateless load-balancer sends a request to a proxy A, which again
>> statelessy forwards it to a
Hi,
Sorry for hijacking this thread, but I've a similar but different
question which bugs me since a while :)
Is there a way in kamailio to statelessy forward a request without
putting its own Via header into the message? Consider an example where a
stateless load-balancer sends a request to a pr
Hi,
On 10/22/2012 07:04 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
It's actually about serial hunting e.g. on ring-timeout (maybe the term
"forking" is ambiguous).
Consider this scenario:
A sends INVITE to proxy, which calls rtpproxy_offer to create a new
Hi Juha,
On 10/22/2012 09:50 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Definition of socket(s) used to connect to (a set) RTPProxy. It may
> specify a UNIX socket or an IPv4/IPv6 UDP socket.
>
> if that is the case, what is the justification for it, i.e, why is tcp
> (and better yet tls) transport not supported
Hi Juha,
On 10/20/2012 07:17 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> i tried what happens when i call start_recording() after calling
> rtpproxy_manage() and got this kind of error to syslog:
>
> Oct 20 19:57:43 siika mediaproxy-ng[8423]: Failed to properly parse UDP
> command line '8554_13 R ngsgznnwgzpu...
Hi,
I'm playing around with xavp, but there are some things I can't wrap my
head around.
What basically works is this:
$xavp(a=>foo) = 'foo';
$xavp(a[0]=>bar) = 'bar';
Getting the value like this:
xlog("L_INFO", "a-foo='$xavp(a=>foo)' and a-bar='$xavp(a=>bar)'");
as well as
xlog("L_INFO", "a-f
On 09/17/2012 10:36 AM, Gary Shergill wrote:
> root@opensep:~# service kamailio restart
> Not starting Kamailio: invalid configuration file!
> -e
> 0(7892) : [cfg.y:3591]: parse error in config file
> /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 392, column 32-36: syntax error
> 0(7892) : [cfg.y:3591]: p
On 08/31/2012 11:10 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Sbc also ofer a propritary way of failover for itself
>> If node1 die node2 will replace it
>
> That's been done both with Asterisk and Kamailio (and propably SEMS) for a
> very long time.
For SEMS it's a commercial module, same goes for the Si
Hi Rupert,
The interesting thing is that the arguments you brought up are exactly
the same in every big corporation we've worked with. They're perfectly
valid, also taking into account the decision making process, which
department takes responsibility for what, and it's also of course
politically
Hi all,
I'm excited to announce the release of the Sipwise sip:provider
Community Edition v2.6, a free and open source turn-key platform, which
uses Kamailio, Sems and Asterisk in its core to provide a full-blown and
feature-rich VoIP soft-switch.
http://www.sipwise.com/news/announcements/spce-v2
Hi guys,
In the pua table, there is a unique key on the "expires" column, which
seems wrong to me, because you'll sooner or later end up with different
pua entries having the same expiry time, no?
At least we ended up with messages like this in the logs, I think it's
caused by pua_reginfo tests:
On 08/15/2012 08:23 PM, Fatima Chahrour wrote:
> Any help or ideas regarding the below?
Both lcr or dispatcher module can do what you want, check the docs at
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/ .
You need to get an idea how this stuff works by studying the example
config shipped with kamaili
On 08/14/2012 11:29 AM, Fatima Chahrour~Vanrise Support wrote:
> I wanted to ask if Kamailio is compatible with ACME Packet or experianced by
> anyone in the list?
> and if there is any document that you recommend about such topic espacially
> in what is related to routing?
There is nothing specia
Hi,
Reviving this old thread, as we ran into the same issue as well. Turned
out it was a small glitch in passing a pointer to the size variable to
pcre, which was int instead of size_t, potentially causing stack
overflows on 64bit machines and messing with the rule_id, so the entry
got deactivated
Hi,
On 07/24/2012 03:53 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> In the failure route check if the reply code is 404 and if yes, trigger
> the APNS logic and then put the call e.g. on a stack and resume e.g.
> every second and ofrward to the "SIP server" again to see if the client
> is registered meanwhile.
>
rom1()
and w_replace_from2(), whereas 3.3 uses one unified w_replace_from(),
which breaks the behavior the fixup function is providing.
Thanks,
Andreas
On 07/05/2012 12:32 AM, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/04/2012 09:42 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> quick look into the
Hi,
On 07/04/2012 09:42 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> quick look into the sources shows that fixup makes the display parameter
> null if its length is 0 -- perhaps introduced in the patch that unified
> the fixup to work also for replacing the To header display. If you have
> time and urge
Hi,
in kamailio 3.3, doing
uac_replace_from("", "$var(myuri)");
doesn't remove the old Display part anymore (although the documentation
still says it should), the debug log is:
DEBUG: uac [uac.c:499]: dsp=(nil) (len=0) , uri=0x7fff87f6b840 (len=28)
DEBUG: uac [replace.c:324]: uri to replace [
Hi,
On 07/02/2012 10:29 AM, Barthel Marco (CI/AFU1) wrote:
> how do I access the reason phrase of winning reply in failure_route?
> The reply code can be accessed via $T_reply_code. Is there something similar
> for the reason phrase?
The tmx module exports $T_rpl(), which you can use like this
On 06/28/2012 04:35 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
> Got some problems when I tried this, not sure how this is intended to work:
>
> listen=tls:192.168.51.133:4343
>
> When starting kamailio 3.3, I get the following error:
>
> ERROR: [tcp_main.c:2915]: ERROR: tcp_init: bind(10,
Hi,
Got some problems when I tried this, not sure how this is intended to work:
listen=tls:192.168.51.133:4343
When starting kamailio 3.3, I get the following error:
ERROR: [tcp_main.c:2915]: ERROR: tcp_init: bind(10,
0x7f5eea45db24, 16) on 192.168.51.133:4343 : Address already in use
ERROR: t
Hi,
On 06/15/2012 05:25 PM, Min Wang wrote:
> | 1 | sip:103@192.168.122.32 | 101 | 192.168.122.32 |
> presence | 2 ||1339772803 |
>
>then I deleted the 103 from the contact list, the watcher table still
> shows the same.
For local storage, I'd expect an unsubsc
Hi Juha,
On 06/13/2012 05:07 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> i did some more presence tests with jitsi. when i start jitsi, it
> registers its sip uri, subscribes to its own presence.winfo and presence
> of another uri, and publishes its own presence.
>
> when i then quit jitsi, it un-publishes its ow
Hi Juha,
On 06/13/2012 11:50 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> For me, reporting a presence bug on the jitsi-users mailing list, along
>> with pointing out exactly where in the code and how to fix it eventually
>> worked. Did you get in touch with them on one of the lists?
>
> i don't remember if i sen
Hi,
On 06/13/2012 10:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> my feeling is that there is no real commitment in jitsi for sip
> presence/xcap. i found a presence bug long time ago and reported it on
> jitsi tracker. so far nothing has happened.
For me, reporting a presence bug on the jitsi-users mailing l
Hi,
On 06/08/2012 03:23 PM, Aft nix wrote:
>> http://www.mbdsys.com/foss/htproxy/file/f16c43f3c3c3/README
>>
>> it is kind of http proxy that can be used to tunnel udp packets. You need to
>> have a client application supporting it, on the sip server side you don't
>> need anything.
>
> Does this
Hi,
On 06/05/2012 08:21 PM, Saul Waizer wrote:
> I am running Kamailio and rtpprox on ec2
>
> I do have a DBUG log for it, one interesting thing to point out: On the
> above line notice how I have 127.0.0.1, I changed this from my external
> ip address because i was getting the following on the r
On 06/04/2012 07:29 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> My question now is if there are any concerns on your side with handling
>> single-quoted URI params the way we handle double-quoted ones? If we
>> were strict, we'd actually need to remove the handling for double-quoted
>> ones, but for backwards
Hi Patrice,
There are couple of characters in the URI which need to be escaped
properly. A correct R-URI would look like this:
sip:a...@cl1.oms.ser.v0.pftest.net;play=http%3A%2F%2F1xx.1xx.1xx.1xx%3A8080%2Ferrfile%2Ferr.wav;repeat=forever
There are string transformations "{s.escape.param}" and
"{
Hi guys,
When I implemented the Path module 6 years ago, I chose to enclose the
received-URI in double-quotes, like this:
Path:
This Path value is stored in usrloc by registrar module, and is
converted to a Route in a subsequent request. This worked fine so far,
because there's the logic in par
Hi,
On 05/09/2012 02:40 PM, Openser Kamailio wrote:
> *Owner/Connection Information (o)*: doubango 1983 678901 IN IP4
> *172.27.170.984* 172.27.170.98
> *Connection Information (c)*: IN IP4 *172.27.170.984* 172.27.170.98
Could it be possible that you're calling rtpproxy_offer() twice?
Andreas
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
