Hi, There finally was some progress on the ice-lite issue in Firefox over the last week or two (after the bug report got stuck for months), so I'd expect Firefox nightly to properly work with ice-lice in a couple of days or so.
Andreas On 05/17/2014 02:30 AM, Alexey Rybalko wrote: > Hi Richard! > > Just have tried an outgoing call to Chrome and Opera and it works fine. > Thank you for the clarification regarding ICE! Dump files and rtp logs > (Firefox, Chrome) I've sent to your email. > > My little investigation brings the following : > > - browsers (Firefox, Chrome and Opera) don't use "a=ice-lite" in their SDP; > > - Chrome and Opera take the role of ICE-CONTROLLING and provide > USE-CANDIDATE for the ICE-Lite peer (mediaproxy) for both "offer" and > "answer" cases; > > - Firefox takes the role of ICE-CONTROLLING and provide USE-CANDIDATE in > case of the "offer" while it takes the role of ICE-CONTROLLED during the > "answer"; > /means no media from WebRTC UA in the latter case/ > > Some other remarks. > > During the call from Fire I saw a lot of "SRTP output wanted, but no > crypto suite was negotiated" messages from rtpengine. However DTLS is > finally was established. Is that one more issue of Firefox? > > Looking in STUN section of the dump files I wonder why Chrome use more > than 10 binding request (USE-CANDIDATE) for each candidate while > Mozilla does it just once. > > regards, > Alexey > > > > 2014-05-16 14:53 GMT+04:00 Richard Fuchs <rfu...@sipwise.com > <mailto:rfu...@sipwise.com>>: > > > There's nothing wrong with the SDP bodies that I can see. I recall that > Firefox had or still has a problem with ICE role switching when ice-lite > is offered. It never completes ICE negotiation (never sends an STUN > packet with "use candidate") and so never starts DTLS handshake. > > You can confirm that by doing a packet capture including the RTP ports > and inspecting the STUN packets. Chrome shouldn't have that problem > though, perhaps do another test run with it? You can send those capture > files to me if you'd like me to have a look. > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
