Hi,
I was wondering if Kamailio support RFC 6140 to register Addresses of Record
(AORs) in bulk map to a unique set of contacts.
REGISTER sip:kamailio.example.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.51.100.3:5060;branch=z9hG4bKnashds7
Max-Forwards: 70
To:
From: ;tag=a23589
Call-ID: 843
Hi,
Below is the log I got (which is correct ordering)
2015-06-01T14:45:50.932170+03:00 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[58396]:
INFO:
Alex Hermann writes:
> That would work. Just remember to store the value you use somewhere (RR-param
> or $sht) to be able to tear down the session when a BYE comes in.
i don't think that that is necessary. based on my observations, at bye
rtpengine_delete() does the job.
-- juha
On Thursday 28 May 2015, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> The question has been, what value could I assign to extra_id_pv to
> uniquely identify the branch. Since $T_branch_idx exists, perhaps a
> good choice could be $sel(via[1].branch) + $T_branch_idx.
That would work. Just remember to store the value yo
execute in config:
load_gws(1);
if (next_gw()) {
xlog("L_INFO", "r-uri is <$ru>\n");
} else {
xlog("L_INFO", "no more gateways>\n");
}
if (next_gw()) {
xlog("L_INFO", "r-uri is <$ru>\n");
} else {
xlog("L_INFO", "no more gateways>\n");
}
if (next_gw()) {
xlog("L_INFO", "r-uri is
Hi Juha,
Below are LCR tables input data
Lcr_gw table :
(id, lcr_id, gw_name, ip_addr, hostname, port, params, uri_scheme,
transport, strip, prefix, tag, flags, defunct)
1, 1, 'gw1', '192.168.26.4', '192.168.26.4', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null,
1,null
2, 1, 'gw2', '192.168.26.1', '192.168.26.1'
Hi All,
I need one IPSec supported opensource SIP server for testing my sip client
endpoint.Could you please tell me which SIP server supporting IPSec ?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks
Priyaranjan
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-use
Hi David,
Sorry, for not answering earlier, but we've had some public holidays
as well as KamailioWorld last week, so the time was quite limited...
:-)
I've attached a really simple example for an AS implemented in
Kamailio. The functionality is really minimalistic:
1) if the dialed number (RURI
Ali Taher writes:
> Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 then
> 192.168.26.6.
> So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 ,
> 192.168.26.6.
> Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 ,
> 192.168.26.6.
> If as
On Monday 01 June 2015 09:44:42 Nelson Migliaro wrote:
> if(src_ip=”192.168.2.5”)
>
> But I would like no include the whole network.
A solution is to use the ipops module:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/ipops.html#ipops.f.is_in_subnet
if (is_in_subnet("$si", "10.0.123.1/24")) {
I 've rechecked on 4.1 the pid still missed but in 4.1 didn't have total_size:
0 so my script still working.
I 'll fix my script, thank for taking time for my case.
Below are logs on 4.1 :
{
entry: 4
pid: 0
rank: 0
used: 1098752
f
Hello,
if none of your server side has mangled the SIP packets, then there
might be some ALG (in the home router or the ISP) that breaks the sip
packets. You can try using different port that 5060 or switch to tcp/tls.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28/05/15 16:19, Badri Ranganathan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
if(src_ip=”192.168.2.5”)
But I would like no include the whole network.
Thank you
2015-06-01 9:43 GMT+02:00 Nelson Migliaro :
> Hello everybody,
>
> I need to apply a specific configuration to softphones registering from a
> specific network range.
>
> Is there something like:
>
>
_
Hello everybody,
I need to apply a specific configuration to softphones registering from a
specific network range.
Is there something like:
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://
Hi Juha,
Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 then
192.168.26.6.
So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 ,
192.168.26.6.
Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 ,
192.168.26.6.
If as you're saying it's sort
Hello,
the conference mixer is supposed to send PUBLISH requests with
information about who is in the conference room, who is speaking at that
moment and so. That is not the job of the presence_conference module.
Eventually, that could be a pua_conference module that has to be
implemented. The pre
Ali Taher writes:
> Everything works fine so far , yet I have a problem that last gateway comes
> first, then gateways are ordered correctly.
hard to say anything based on the information you gave. smaller tuple
priority value means higher priority.
-- juha
___
Hello,
you can simply forward register requests to asterisk boxes if you don't
want Kamailio to replace the Contact address and maintain location
records. You would better use a version of asterisk with path support if
you have phones behind the nat and enable path in kamailio as well.
Cheers,
Da
Hello,
I'm using LCR module to send multiple choices.
Everything works fine so far , yet I have a problem that last gateway comes
first, then gateways are ordered correctly.
Below is correct sorting of gateways:
First gateway : 192.168.26.4
Second gateway: 192.168.26.1
Third gateway :
Hello,
is the proxy also listening on a public IP?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/05/15 14:01, Mir Jee wrote:
> HI!
> I need help to configure RTPProxy.
> I have working Kamailio on Centos 6.5, On LAN everything is working
> fine. Now I want my other users to connect using 3G or any other network.
> Pleas
Hello,
I don't recall any changes in this part for 4.1 to 4.2, we will
investigate, but are you sure you got all ok in 4.1?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01/06/15 05:26, Dao Hai Dang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I need help with kamcmd pkg.stats on Kamailio 4.2.5.
>
> When I used this command to check kamailio proc
21 matches
Mail list logo
