Hi Juha, Below are LCR tables input data
Lcr_gw table : (id, lcr_id, gw_name, ip_addr, hostname, port, params, uri_scheme, transport, strip, prefix, tag, flags, defunct) 1, 1, 'gw1', '192.168.26.4', '192.168.26.4', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null, 1,null 2, 1, 'gw2', '192.168.26.1', '192.168.26.1', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null, 1,null 3, 1, 'gw3', '192.168.26.6', '192.168.26.6', 5060, '', 1, 1, 0, null,null, 1,null LCR_rule target: (id,lcr_id, prefix,from_uri,request_uri, stopper, enabled) 1, 1, '961', null,null, 1, 1 LCR_rule_target table : (id,lcr_id ,rule_id,gw_id,priority,weight) 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2 3, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3 Thanks Ali -----Original Message----- From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Juha Heinanen Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 11:32 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices Ali Taher writes: > Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 > then 192.168.26.6. > So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 > , 192.168.26.6. > Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 , > 192.168.26.6. > If as you're saying it's sorting issue , then why I got 192.168.26.6 > gateway twice (at the first and at the end). as i mentioned, it is not possible to say anything based on the above information. you need to check your lcr tables, especially lcr_rule_target table. -- juha _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
