Re: [SR-Users] simplest config file possible - not working!

Hi Daniel I've tried a couple of incantations; > kamailio -e > kamailio -E and a combination of the two. That's all. On 1 Oct 2014, at 07:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > How did you start it? > > Daniel > > On 01/10/14 02:27, White, Phil wrote: >> Sorry Guys, I'm very new to this. Tak

Re: [SR-Users] simplest config file possible - not working!

How did you start it? Daniel On 01/10/14 02:27, White, Phil wrote: Sorry Guys, I'm very new to this. Taking a dive 'under the hood', to try to learn what is going on, and to see what I can achieve. I have 1 sip device ( voip telephone) on the network, constantly firing out REGISTER requests

[SR-Users] simplest config file possible - not working!

Sorry Guys, I'm very new to this. Taking a dive 'under the hood', to try to learn what is going on, and to see what I can achieve. I have 1 sip device ( voip telephone) on the network, constantly firing out REGISTER requests (I have turned off my asterisk server!). That's good. I have a terminal w

[SR-Users] rtpengine alt stream question

Hello, I recently encountered SDP attributes that look like this: Media Attribute (a): alt:1 3 : njfxofkg bavpjfxg 192.168.2.59 41978 Media Attribute (a): alt:2 2 : fpukfyaj dqmiarjx 192.168.111.1 41978 Media Attribute (a): alt:3 1 : euvrwenk jctmhavh 192.168.238.1 41978 I was not fami

Re: [SR-Users] R: Re: R: Re: RTPPROXY & BRANCH

Hi Richard, this is more or less the same problem that I am experiencing. To understand it better, just assume one branch needs to do SRTP, and the other simple RTP. To make this happen, you will have to enable rtpengine differently for the same call, and this is where the crash/error happens. R

Re: [SR-Users] Call Group versus MAX_BRANCHES limit

Hi Daniel, would it be inappropriate to increase the branch number to the maximum possible, by default? Regards, Carlos On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 29/09/14 22:47, João Vitor Arruda wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have a question related wit

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio with Jitsi - Presence trouble

Hi,I ran the code on my server (as Daniel suggested) and then tried to send message from one user to other but no traffic was detected.ngrep d any qt W byline "sip" port 5060interface: anyfilter: (ip or ip6) and ( port 5060 )match: sipAlso, after I tried to install the PRESENCE module and having

[SR-Users] dlg_set_timeout_by_profile not working on kamailio 4.1.5

I'm trying to use dlg_set_timeout_by_profile and it doesn't do nothing on Kamailio 4.1.5 If i try to use the dlg_set_timeout, it also doesn't work, but it gives the following error CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_timer.c:205]: update_dlg_timer(): Trying to update a bogus dlg tl=0x7f9825ac6880 tl->next=(nil

Re: [SR-Users] Call Group versus MAX_BRANCHES limit

Hello, On 29/09/14 22:47, João Vitor Arruda wrote: Hi folks, I have a question related with the limited number of branches being 12 in config.h #define MAX_BRANCHES12 /*!< maximum number of branches per transaction */ I am trying to implement a Call Group that consists in t

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio with Jitsi - Presence trouble

Hello, you should grab the SIP traffic on kamailio server and send it to the mailing list. In this way we can spot why you get the 403 Not Allowed. You can use: ngrep -d any -qt -W byline "sip" port 5060 Cheers, Daniel On 30/09/14 08:50, Gaurav Kumar wrote: Hello all! I tried sending this

Re: [SR-Users] Uri transformations stopped working after upgrade from 3.3 to 4.1.6.

On 30/09/14 11:46, Julia Boudniatsky wrote: $(tu{uri.uparam,cic}) gets ERROR wrong format, $(tu{uri.uparam}) return : phone So, uparam return the value of parameter "user" . Right, I forgot what I implemented and misread the docs. You should add a transformation to return the user paramete

Re: [SR-Users] Uri transformations stopped working after upgrade from 3.3 to 4.1.6.

$(tu{uri.uparam,cic}) gets ERROR wrong format, $(tu{uri.uparam}) return : phone So, uparam return the value of parameter "user" . I solved a problem by usage $(tu{param.value,cic,;}) BR Julia On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [SR-Users] Questions about multiple contacts in kamailio

Hi, you can achieve this by using the flag 0x04 when calling save() function from registrar module: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/registrar.html#idp1965144 Regards, Federico On 30 Sep 2014 10:54, "qw" wrote: Hi, I have one question about contact in kamailio. Sometimes, one u

Re: [SR-Users] Uri transformations stopped working after upgrade from 3.3 to 4.1.6.

Hello, On 30/09/14 10:41, Julia Boudniatsky wrote: Hello, Some Uri transformations stopped working after upgrade from 3.3 to 4.1.6. *To: ;user=phone>* _In v3.3_ $tu({uri.params}) return:cic=012;csel=noind $tu({uri.param,cic}) return: 012 _

[SR-Users] Questions about multiple contacts in kamailio

Hi, I have one question about contact in kamailio. Sometimes, one user may register multiple contacts in kamailio server, where contacts are represented as ip:port. For example, the user registers at first, and lose connection to the internet later. After one minute, the user connects the in

[SR-Users] Uri transformations stopped working after upgrade from 3.3 to 4.1.6.

Hello, Some Uri transformations stopped working after upgrade from 3.3 to 4.1.6. *To: http://noind@10.25.153.150:5060>;user=phone>* *In v3.3* $tu({uri.params}) return: cic=012;csel=noind $tu({uri.param,cic}) return:012 *In v4.1.6* $tu({uri.params}) r

[SR-Users] R: Re: R: Re: RTPPROXY & BRANCH

Unfortunately rtpengine doesn't work in this way. At the end of the calls this is the output log: Final packet stats: Tag 'Fw3D7R0', created 0:41 ago, in dialogue with 'TTPyT~Hdw' Media #1, port 30224 <> 192.168.10.20:7078 , 540 p, 92880 b, 0 e Media #1, port 30225 <> 192.168.10.20:7079 (RT