Thanks for the reply, now i get it
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> To give a better visual perspective, practically if you do:
>
>
> $sht(a=>$ci::srcip) = $si;
>
> for and INVITE request that comes from 1.2.3.4 and has the header:
>
> Call-Id: abcd
>
> Then in
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
> El 29/08/14 14:44, Paul Belanger escribió:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> El 28/08/14 19:09, Paul Belanger escribió:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
w
On 8/29/14, 1:42 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso wrote:
Please consider the following SIP packet exchange, as seen by a
tcpdump running on 201.234.196.170. Here 198.58.101.75 initiates a
call to 201.234.196.170:
IP 198.58.101.75.5060 > 201.234.196.170.5060
INVITE sip:*43@201.234.196.170:5060 SIP/2.0
El 29/08/14 14:44, Paul Belanger escribió:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
El 28/08/14 19:09, Paul Belanger escribió:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
As a continuation of my project, I am trying to set up Kamailio as a
Websocket bri
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
> El 28/08/14 19:09, Paul Belanger escribió:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As a continuation of my project, I am trying to set up Kamailio as a
>>> Websocket bridge to Asterisk. The asteri
Please consider the following SIP packet exchange, as seen by a tcpdump running
on 201.234.196.170. Here 198.58.101.75 initiates a call to 201.234.196.170:
IP 198.58.101.75.5060 > 201.234.196.170.5060
INVITE sip:*43@201.234.196.170:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.58.101.75:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7
El 28/08/14 19:09, Paul Belanger escribió:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
wrote:
As a continuation of my project, I am trying to set up Kamailio as a
Websocket bridge to Asterisk. The asterisk instance is running as localhost,
with its own websocket support disabled, but
Hello,
should be in request_route or reply_route (from core) only, before
creating the transaction and not after doing record_route() for requests.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/08/14 16:18, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi,
okay, so I really misunderstood the IP parameter. Thanks for your
solution, from t
Hi,
okay, so I really misunderstood the IP parameter. Thanks for your solution,
from the first look it does work. Is there anything I should consider or
watch specifically when using msg_apply_changes() in the middle of
processing the request?
Best Regards,
Sebastian
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:5
The last .zip file is also showing only 3 packets (different ones) --
can you check the trace has all the packet before you compress? Maybe
you can put it somewhere on a server for download and send me the link,
so I get it over http.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/08/14 09:36, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello,
starting with 3.0 we got the implementation from SER at that time (being
more flexible with config and later getting asynchronous support).
A quick grep in the sources shows things related to server_name, but
apparently is just for accessing them via cfg selects.
I cc-ed Jan who is a
Hi,
Back in Kamailio 1.5, the release notes state:
"support for TLS server_name extension (aka SNI=server name indication)"
However, I cannot find any indication of this in the current TLS docs, and
trying to set tls_server_name or server_name in tls.cfg fails with
"unsupported option".
Is this
Hello,
the second parameter is to give the IP to appear in sdp, instead of the
rtpproxy ip.
What you can try is to update the sdp with fix_natted_sdp() with the
source IP as seen by the LB, then do msg_apply_changes() and pass the
flag to trust the ip in sdp -- not sure it is going to work,
Apparently the file got corrupted, most probably by email client/server
encoding, and it shows only three packets.
Can you resend it compress as tgz?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/08/14 07:08, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
My pcap file. Daniel sorry for first time sended message to your
private mail. Was a
Hi,
I have the following setup:
UAC ---> LB ---> Proxy ---> GW
In NAT scenarios the loadbalancer detects it, but the proxy communicates
with the RTP proxy. I want to send the original caller IP as detected by
the loadbalancer (and transported to the proxy) to the RTP proxy.
As far as I understa
Hi Both,
In this case the system was using binaries from opensuse build service, so
gcc I believe?
Cheers,
Charles
On 28 Aug 2014 21:25, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 28/08/14 20:32, Jason Penton wrote:
>
> Hey Daniel,
>
> I am puzzled by how this could make any differen
I don't mind to receive directly attachments that can contain sensitive
data. But you have to write an email via mailing list saying you do/did so.
With gmail I am checking mostly the emails that are filtered with
various rules, otherwise, the rest land together with a lot of
spam/advertising
17 matches
Mail list logo
