Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated

2011-09-16 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey Phillip, after looking closer at what has been reported to me initially, your case may be different after all. Could you possibly use "kamctl fifo dlg_list" to check what state the majority of dialogs that should be terminated in your opinion are in? Being given the reference counter should b

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] kamailio debian/ubuntu support

2011-09-16 Thread Manwe
El Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:35:37 +0200 Klaus Darilion escribió: > > > On 15.09.2011 10:44, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote: > > When the time for 3.2 (master branch at the moment) comes, I'll add Wheezy > > support. Not sure about Ubuntu distro support. Should we add support to > > Ubuntu 11.10 or wait u

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-16 Thread Mikael Williams
> > ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN) manually > in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to peer calls between > 2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All my VOIP customers supports > STUN/TURN but without ICE > > One more thing: I would like to as

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-16 Thread Klaus Darilion
STUN alone is not 100% sufficient, only ICE+TURN is reliable. Thus, only if all your clients support ICE+TURN then you can drop rtpproxy. klaus On 16.09.2011 16:47, Mikael Williams wrote: Dear All, I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat traversal to drp the rtpp

[SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

2011-09-16 Thread Mikael Williams
Dear All, I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and relay server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in case of Symmetric NAT Regards ___ S

Re: [SR-Users] Lazy evaluation in if expressions?

2011-09-16 Thread Klaus Darilion
IIRC (there was a similar thread years ago): yes On 16.09.2011 13:20, Morten Isaksen wrote: Does Kamailio use lazy evaluation in if expressions? Like if ($var(a) == 2&& $var(b) ==3) { ... } then $var(b) == 3 is only evaluated if $var(a) == 2 is true ___

Re: [SR-Users] Communication from IPv6 to Ipv4

2011-09-16 Thread Klaus Darilion
you have to use the 'r' flag: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/rtpproxy.html#id3024166 klaus On 16.09.2011 11:42, Loïc Fofana wrote: My architecture is described below: TDM device--- Call server[IPv4]---[IPv4]Kamailio[IPv6][IPv6]Asterisk--

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] kamailio debian/ubuntu support

2011-09-16 Thread Klaus Darilion
On 15.09.2011 10:44, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote: When the time for 3.2 (master branch at the moment) comes, I'll add Wheezy support. Not sure about Ubuntu distro support. Should we add support to Ubuntu 11.10 or wait until the lts 12.04 is released? I found it always very confusing that there

Re: [SR-Users] wt_timer, delayed replies and sendto error

2011-09-16 Thread Andreas Granig
Me again, On 09/16/2011 02:46 PM, Andreas Granig wrote: > And this is what I'd need to add if I got you right: > > # the default reply route used when transaction is already gone > onreply_route > { > if(reply from inside) > force_send_socket(localhost); > else > force_send_socket(pub

Re: [SR-Users] wt_timer, delayed replies and sendto error

2011-09-16 Thread Andreas Granig
Hi, On 09/16/2011 09:10 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> It's actually an educated guess that this could be related to wt_timer, >> but I don't know what else it could be. >> > what happens is that when transaction is active and tm is handling the > replies, they are forwarded using the same

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated

2011-09-16 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Hi Timo Thanks for the update! Regards Phillip On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Timo Reimann wrote: > Hey Phillip, > > > On 16.09.2011 13:35, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as > > being active when in fact the c

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated

2011-09-16 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey Phillip, On 16.09.2011 13:35, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > Hello > > I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as > being active when in fact the call has already been completed long ago > and this is giving wrong number of concurrent calls on our SNMP work > stati

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio terminating after upgrading from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4

2011-09-16 Thread Timo Reimann
On 16.09.2011 13:19, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > Thanks for your response Timo. > > so you say i should try: > > make mode=debug [CFLAGS=-g]? "mode=debug" will take care of adding the -g ("debug") switch to gcc, so just skip the "[CFLAGS=-g]" part. Just do something like: make mode=debug all

[SR-Users] Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated

2011-09-16 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Hello I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as being active when in fact the call has already been completed long ago and this is giving wrong number of concurrent calls on our SNMP work station (CACTI) when polling the data from Kamailio. I realized this only starte

[SR-Users] Lazy evaluation in if expressions?

2011-09-16 Thread Morten Isaksen
Does Kamailio use lazy evaluation in if expressions? Like if ($var(a) == 2 && $var(b) ==3) { ... } then $var(b) == 3 is only evaluated if $var(a) == 2 is true -- Morten Isaksen ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing l

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio terminating after upgrading from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4

2011-09-16 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Thanks for your response Timo. so you say i should try: make mode=debug [CFLAGS=-g]? Thanks for your assistance. Regards Phillip On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Timo Reimann wrote: > On 16.09.2011 12:00, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > > Could you please explain in a little more detail how to

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio terminating after upgrading from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4

2011-09-16 Thread Timo Reimann
On 16.09.2011 12:00, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > Could you please explain in a little more detail how to compile Kamailio > with debug symbols? > Do i use the command make CFLAGS=-g ? > then make QUIET=no all? I always add "mode=debug" to make, e.g.: make mode=debug HTH, --Timo > On Thu,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio terminating after upgrading from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4

2011-09-16 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Thanks for your email Marius. Could you please explain in a little more detail how to compile Kamailio with debug symbols? Do i use the command make CFLAGS=-g ? then make QUIET=no all? Thanks again for your assistance! Regards Phillip On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:02 PM, marius zbihlei wrote: > On

[SR-Users] Communication from IPv6 to Ipv4

2011-09-16 Thread Loïc Fofana
My architecture is described below: TDM device--- Call server[IPv4]---[IPv4]Kamailio[IPv6][IPv6]Asterisk-[IPv6]Linphone * * * ** * * *

[SR-Users] (no subject)

2011-09-16 Thread Loïc Fofana
This is my scenario: Call server -(IPV4)Kamailio(IPV6)--Asterisk(IPV6)--Linphone(IPV6) * * * Media server ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr

Re: [SR-Users] wt_timer, delayed replies and sendto error

2011-09-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 9/14/11 2:41 PM, Andreas Granig wrote: Hi, Another funny thing I encountered lately is this: Client sends INVITE via kamailio (via dispatcher) to sems, gets back 100/200, sends another couple of INVITE with same CSeq (looks like retransmissions), gets back more 200, then sends ACKs f