[SR-Users] LCR strip and tags (prefix) - Kamailio 3.1

2011-05-13 Thread Juha Heinanen
Alexandre Abreu writes: > With this LCR release from Kamailio 3.1 the table 'lcr_gw' makes four > fields unique: lcr_id, ip_addr, port and hostname. in master version this was relaxed in the code: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blobdiff;f=modules/lcr/lcr_mod.c;h=79

[SR-Users] LCR strip and tags (prefix) - Kamailio 3.1

2011-05-13 Thread Alexandre Abreu
Hi, With this LCR release from Kamailio 3.1 the table 'lcr_gw' makes four fields unique: lcr_id, ip_addr, port and hostname. This table is also responsible for setting 'strip' and 'tag' parameters values for the gateways. What I am trying to accomplish is to use different strip and tag v

Re: [SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Asgaroth
Hi Klaus, On 13/05/2011, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Sending OPTIONS/INFO keep-alives should be possible from the registrar. > Sending just CRLF for keep-alive can only be done by the outboundproxy. > How would I achieve this from the registrar? This would be ideal for me, if I could have the regist

Re: [SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ovidiu, > > I have just tried this nat_traversal module, and it looks like I > cannot run it from the registrars, as it appears that the > "nat_keepalive()" parameter will only send the keepalive to the source > address

Re: [SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Asgaroth
Hi Ovidiu, I have just tried this nat_traversal module, and it looks like I cannot run it from the registrars, as it appears that the "nat_keepalive()" parameter will only send the keepalive to the source address the message was sent from, which, if I run it from my registrar, will be the address

Re: [SR-Users] core in dialog module

2011-05-13 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey, On 13.05.2011 11:11, Timo Reimann wrote: > On 12.05.2011 15:55, Anton Roman wrote: >> my answer is inline: >> >> 2011/5/12 Timo Reimann > > >> As to the reason of the segfault, the dialog structure or hash table may >> already be gone when unref_dlg() is

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1.3 uncontrolled core dump

2011-05-13 Thread Dominguez Jover, Ricardo
Hi Klaus, I'm investigating why my config tries to solve "@192.168.64.36", I know it is related to presence subscriptions. Many "@192.168.64.36" petitions are being processed, however Kamailio only crashes when it comes from one of our users. ¡! I'm working on it Anyway I think that Kamailio s

Re: [SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Klaus Darilion
Sending OPTIONS/INFO keep-alives should be possible from the registrar. Sending just CRLF for keep-alive can only be done by the outboundproxy. You could save() the REGISTER before forwarding to the REGISTRAR (or in a reply route if response=200 OK) and set the natping flag before. Then the oubto

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1.3 uncontrolled core dump

2011-05-13 Thread Klaus Darilion
1. seems like your config is broken and request uri is set to sip:@192.168.64.36 2. Anyways, Kamailio shouldn't crash. I tried to reproduce the failure, but my Kamailio does not crash. regards klaus Am 13.05.2011 10:19, schrieb Dominguez Jover, Ricardo: > 06 tip1 /usr/local/kamailio-3.1.3/sbin

Re: [SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Try the nat_traversal module: http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/nat_traversal.html It should handle this kind of scenarios. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Asgaroth <00asgarot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a scenario where our registrar's are s

[SR-Users] nathelpler module path support

2011-05-13 Thread Asgaroth
Hi All, I have a scenario where our registrar's are sitting behind our sip proxy. The sip proxy is the only system that has access to the outside world. Our registrar's are all on internal private addresses. I am trying to configure our registrar's to perform nat pinging. However, because the reg

Re: [SR-Users] core in dialog module

2011-05-13 Thread Timo Reimann
Hey Anton, On 12.05.2011 15:55, Anton Roman wrote: > my answer is inline: > > 2011/5/12 Timo Reimann > > As to the reason of the segfault, the dialog structure or hash table may > already be gone when unref_dlg() is called. Can you go to stack #0 and >

[SR-Users] DBTEXT - authentication against text files

2011-05-13 Thread Pavel Segeč
Hi, does anybody have some knowledge or experience with DBTEXT module? I'm searching for working DBTEXT files examples and config files examples... thanks palo ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-use

[SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1.3 uncontrolled core dump

2011-05-13 Thread Dominguez Jover, Ricardo
Hi everybody. As posted in http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-May/068514.html we are having an uncontrolled core dump. It seems that the crash occurs when some users registers to Kamailio. After upgrading to Kamilio release 3.1.3 we are able to generate the following GDB: GNU gdb