Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-25 Thread Jagannath Naidu
Any one ?? On 25 July 2015 at 11:14, Jagannath Naidu < jagannath.na...@fosteringlinux.com> wrote: > > Thanks mike. > But I think Amos is right. > > On 25 July 2015 at 00:27, Mike wrote: > >> I see a few issues. >> >> 1. The report from the log shows a 192.168.*.* address, common LAN IP >>

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Jagannath Naidu
Thanks mike. But I think Amos is right. On 25 July 2015 at 00:27, Mike wrote: > I see a few issues. > > 1. The report from the log shows a 192.168.*.* address, common LAN IP > The ip 192.168.122.1 is the ip address of virtual interface (acts as a default gateway for Virtual machines). I did N

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Jagannath Naidu
Thanks Amos,, mike On 25 July 2015 at 03:20, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 25/07/2015 4:59 a.m., Jagannath Naidu wrote: > > 1. Its not a transparent proxy. > > > > 2. My clients get wpad configuration from AD server. So there are two > > question. > > 2.1 :I know that wpad is used to identify pr

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/07/2015 4:59 a.m., Jagannath Naidu wrote: > 1. Its not a transparent proxy. > > 2. My clients get wpad configuration from AD server. So there are two > question. > 2.1 :I know that wpad is used to identify proxy server and port(and rest > other bypass rules). When clients resolve to wpad.

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/07/2015 6:57 a.m., Mike wrote: > I see a few issues. > > 1. The report from the log shows a 192.168.*.* address, common LAN IP > > Then in the squid.conf: > 2. You have wvdial destination as 10.1.*.* addresses, which is a > completely different internal network. > Typically there will be no

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Mike
I see a few issues. 1. The report from the log shows a 192.168.*.* address, common LAN IP Then in the squid.conf: 2. You have wvdial destination as 10.1.*.* addresses, which is a completely different internal network. Typically there will be no internal routing or communication from a 192.168.

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Jagannath Naidu
1. Its not a transparent proxy. 2. My clients get wpad configuration from AD server. So there are two question. 2.1 :I know that wpad is used to identify proxy server and port(and rest other bypass rules). When clients resolve to wpad.abc.com, is there way that I can overwrite the wpad file off

Re: [squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Jagannath Naidu
On 24 July 2015 at 21:05, Jagannath Naidu < jagannath.na...@fosteringlinux.com> wrote: > Dear List, > > I have been working on this for last two weeks, but never got it resolved. > > We have a application server (SERVER) in our local network and a desktop > application (CLIENT). The application p

[squid-users] ISSUE accssing content

2015-07-24 Thread Jagannath Naidu
Dear List, I have been working on this for last two weeks, but never got it resolved. We have a application server (SERVER) in our local network and a desktop application (CLIENT). The application picks proxy settings from IE. And we also have a wensense proxy server case 1: when there is no pr