ess it boils down to which directives are safe to apply to workers but not
the others? I'm working with squid-4.16 and starting to test on 5.
Thanks again for the help
Senor
From: squid-users on behalf of Alex
Rousskov
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 202
discovering them is all I'm looking for.
Thanks
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] SSL handshake
On 8/8/21 1:48 AM, senor wrote:
> Can you point to a patch under test or other changes that we can use
> to alleviate this pain?
I will probably regret sharing this unfinished work, but our current
changes can be found at [1]. A F
Wireshark flags the next protocol extension as malformed coming from (popular
origin server).
Alex - Can you point to a patch under test or other changes that we can use to
alleviate this pain?
The extension is included in the Server Hello due to it being included in the
Client Hello. I was ho
you think eliminating the assert is not a good idea, I think my question
is answered.
Thanks
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:55 PM
To: senor; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Adaptation error
On 6/4/20 4:15
.
Any guidance or hints are appreciated. Thanks
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Just for clarity for future searches I think that was intended to be
reply_header_access/reply_header_replace combo. It all starts sounding the same
after a while.
From: squid-users on behalf of
senor
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 10:08 AM
To: squid
rs
On 9/23/19 12:49 AM, senor wrote:
> I have custom error pages with content needing the Content-Type
> header to reflect what it is (like JSON). I don't see any current
> options providing that option for error page handling.
I would start with http_reply_access/reply_header_repla
seems like overkill.
Thanks for any help.
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
should be submitted as a feature request? Am I misunderstanding
something?
Enlightenment is appreciated. Thanks,
-Senor
[cid:part1.C62E7EC8.EA524190@hotmail.com]
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
his to the customer.
Thanks for the weekend response.
Senor
On 6/23/2018 17:09, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 06/23/2018 04:38 PM, senor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've noticed that a tunneled 443 request is not logged to access.log
>> until the client or server terminat
like to have but need timely logging more). I tried a logformat that
excluded any data not known at initiation time with no luck. I'm hoping
I just missed something.
Thanks for any help.
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid
uot;kid=N"
documented? I haven't gone to the source code yet and would like not to.
Thanks in advance,
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Thanks Amos. I guess I was assuming that squid was just copying the ALPN
extension info from Client Hello without regard to capabilities (squid
3.5.26). I'll take another stab at the debug info and post more details
if that doesn't pop something up.
Senor
On 11/7/2017 20:29, Amo
Help or corrections to my assumptions are appreciated.
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
in advance,
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
On 3/17/2017 7:45, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 03/16/2017 10:42 PM, senor wrote:
>
>> I understand that AUFS is not SMP aware but if each worker has its own
>> AUFS cache is there any problem other than the inefficiencies of
>> duplicate cache?
>
> Yes. Client
duplicate cache?
I'm pretty sure that AUFS is used with squid running in SMP mode a lot.
The squid wiki even has a CARP configuration example for this combination.
I apologize if I am misunderstanding the statements.
Senor
___
squid-users mailing l
Side note...
no_cache is not flagged as an error in 3.5.24.
If it is misconfigured you will get a notice though. It seems to be
treated as a legit alias.
Senor
On 2/7/2017 20:40, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 8/02/2017 12:50 a.m., Jude Karuhanga wrote:
>> Hello there,
>>
>>
&g
be expected by
using ssl_crtd? What metrics would be best to view if comparing with and
without?
Thanks in advance.
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
me".
I'll submit a request for the description of cafile/tls-cafile to change
and move the discussion to there.
Thanks all,
Senor
On 1/6/2017 2:06, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 2017-01-06 21:27, senor wrote:
>> Thank you for the response but I think my question is still unanswered.
&g
less there were additional intermediate certs between the mitm
cert and the trusted CA known to the client. (As in CA1 is trusted by
clients, CA1 signs CA2 which signs CA3 which is used as MITM cert,
cafile=CA2)
Thanks for comments.
Senor
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:40 AM, senor
hat anyone has
to say about my assumptions or understanding.
Thanks,
Senor
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On
> Behalf Of senor
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 8:11 AM
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] squid SMP notes
>
> It is unclear to me how the more recent 'multiple instance' confi
It is unclear to me how the more recent 'multiple instance' configuration
compares with that of 'SMP Scaling'.
Is there a short and sweet description of pros and cons or is the multiple
instance simply the new way? The wiki pages vary in detail of implementation
but don't directly state any ad
I discovered that 'squid -k rotate' toggles cache.log output into full debug
mode as if I had done 'squid -k debug'. Execute a second rotate and it toggles
debug off. This only happens when I have an ecap adapter configured. Comment
out those lines and everything works as expected.
My question
When I execute 'squid -k rotate' it acts like I also executed 'squid -k debug'
and toggles full debugging. Anyone else see this behavior? I've tried numerous
combinations of conf options. Not sure at what version this started.
I've just begun investigation so looking for others with similar conf
27 matches
Mail list logo