It consumes the data for its graphs from a REST API via HTTP, on ports in
the 8000-9000 range.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Enrico Heine
wrote:
> Which protocols and ports is that GUI tool using for what it's doing with
> it's remote endpoint that requires kerberos authentication?
>
> Am 14.
Which protocols and ports is that GUI tool using for what it's doing with it's
remote endpoint that requires kerberos authentication?
Am 14. März 2018 19:27:48 MEZ schrieb Patrick Nick :
>Hi Enrico,
>
>You write
>
>> But squid cannot authenticate those requests on the destination
>server if
>>
Hi Enrico,
You write
> But squid cannot authenticate those requests on the destination server if
> it needs authentication as well.
So how do I make it NOT need authentication?
I want it to authenticate the request on behalf of the client, so that my
client app does not need to authenticate.
Sq
Hi,
Easy going, you can allow traffic from a specific source or traffic to a
specific destination before you require authentication on the proxy. You can
also restrict it to both, src and destination and additionaly specific ports.
But squid cannot authenticate those requests on the destination
Hello list,
We are in the process of Kerberizing our Big Data operation, but we have a
GUI tool in use that is not capable of Kerberos authentication. I'm looking
for a way to keep using it, which means that it needs to read data from a
Kerberos-protected service.
To be clear, I'm looking for a p
I guess, your using wrong approach.
You trying to find ready-to-use solution for /custom/ configuration.
At maximum, you can find some bricks for this. And anyway you should
build your custom solution yourself.
Bricks is here: https://wiki.squid-cache.org :-)
14.03.2018 20:28, Danilo V пишет:
>
Thanks for the explanation.
Do you have any guide?
Em qua, 14 de mar de 2018 às 10:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <
uh...@fantomas.sk> escreveu:
> On 13.03.18 14:44, Danilo V wrote:
> >I mean SSL bump in explicit mode.
> >So intercept is a essencial requirement for running SSL bump?
>
> No, you asked
On 15/03/18 02:55, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
>> ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
>> It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
>> performance and it has regular maintenance.
>> If you have a question, you can ask the support desk
On 15/03/18 02:13, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 14:06, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
>> Then the first thing you and your readers need to be clear on is that
>> SquidGuard was end-of-life'd many years ago. It is long overdue for
>> removal or replacement. This has impact such as the one you sa
14.03.2018 19:55, Nicolas Kovacs пишет:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
>> ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
>> It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
>> performance and it has regular maintenance.
>> If you have a question, you can ask the support desk
On 14/03/18 10:55, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
performance and it has regular maintenance.
If you have a question, you can ask the support desk at
www.url
14.03.2018 19:06, Amos Jeffries пишет:
> On 15/03/18 01:43, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>>> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
>>> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
>>> filtering rules are becom
Le 14/03/2018 à 14:46, Marcus Kool a écrit :
> ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
> It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good
> performance and it has regular maintenance.
> If you have a question, you can ask the support desk at
> www.urlfilterdb.com.
> You will get an ans
ufdbGuard is the tool that you need.
It is an old fork of ufdbGuard with many new features, very good performance
and it has regular maintenance.
If you have a question, you can ask the support desk at www.urlfilterdb.com.
You will get an answer from me or a colleague.
Marcus
On 14/03/18 09:39
On 15/03/18 01:43, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
>> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
>> filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
> FYI, this is the c
On 13.03.18 14:44, Danilo V wrote:
I mean SSL bump in explicit mode.
So intercept is a essencial requirement for running SSL bump?
No, you asked for "explicit mode with ssl intercept" which I pointed out is
illogical.
Em ter, 13 de mar de 2018 às 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <
uh...@fantoma
Le 14/03/2018 à 14:06, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> Then the first thing you and your readers need to be clear on is that
> SquidGuard was end-of-life'd many years ago. It is long overdue for
> removal or replacement. This has impact such as the one you saw on HTTPS
> traffic support which was only ad
On 15/03/18 01:43, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
>> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
>> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
>> filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
>
> FYI, this is th
Le 14/03/2018 à 13:39, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
> Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
> SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
> filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
FYI, this is the course. It's a HOWTO in simple text format.
I'm
Le 14/03/2018 à 13:33, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> You do not need SG or any fancy redirector helpers at all for that.
Yes, I do. Because this is part of a step-by-step course about
SquidGuard, which worked perfectly under Slackware Linux. And my
filtering rules are becoming increasingly complex.
N
On 15/03/18 01:07, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only
> on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7,
> and right now I'm having a little problem with that.
>
> Squid works perfectly so far as a transpa
Hi,
I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only
on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7,
and right now I'm having a little problem with that.
Squid works perfectly so far as a transparent HTTP + HTTPS cache proxy.
The next step is to add
22 matches
Mail list logo
