Thanks for the explanation. Do you have any guide? Em qua, 14 de mar de 2018 às 10:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas < uh...@fantomas.sk> escreveu:
> On 13.03.18 14:44, Danilo V wrote: > >I mean SSL bump in explicit mode. > >So intercept is a essencial requirement for running SSL bump? > > No, you asked for "explicit mode with ssl intercept" which I pointed out is > illogical. > > > >Em ter, 13 de mar de 2018 às 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas < > >uh...@fantomas.sk> escreveu: > >> On 13.03.18 13:44, Danilo V wrote: > >> >Is it possible/feasible to configure squid in explicit mode with ssl > >> >intercept? > >> > >> maybe you mean SSL bump in explicit mode? > > It is possible to bump explicit proxy. > > >> >Due to architecture of my network it is not possible to implement > >> >transparent proxy. > >> > >> excuse me? > >> by "transparent" people mean what we usually call "intercept". > > >> >What would be the behavior of applications that dont support proxy - > i.e. > >> >dont forward requests to proxy? > >> > >> they mest be intercepted. > > "must" be intercepted. Since you said that it's not possible transparent (I > believe you have meant intercepting) proxy, it's apparently not possible to > handle applications that do not support proxy. > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > 2B|!2B, that's a question! > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
