Hi Amos,
cache_mem 0
cache deny all
already there.
Regarding number of nic ports we have 4 10G eth cards 2 in each bonding
interface.
Well, entire config would be way too long but here is the static part:
via off
cpu_affinity_map process_numbers=1 cores=2
forwarded_for delete
visible_hostname
I wanted to test the ext_ldap_group_acl so I created a ldap domain.
The command I am testing is:
/usr/lib/squid3/ext_ldap_group_acl -b "DC=ngtech,DC=local" -D
"CN=admin,DC=ngtech,DC=local" -w "password" -f
"(&(objectclass=person)(sAMAccountName=%v)(memberof=CN=%a,DC=ngtech,DC=local))"
-h 127.0.
On 31/07/2015 10:39 a.m., Mike wrote:
> I suspect this may be a bug with squid 3.4.x since this issue happened
> on 2 different squid servers, one is 3.4.6, another is 3.4.7. Yet on the
> backups to each, one has 3.5.1 and other has 3.5.6 (I updated it today),
> and they are not affected by this, b
On 31/07/2015 8:05 a.m., Josip Makarevic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with squid setup (squid version 3.5.6, built from source,
> centos 6.6)
> I've tried 2 options:
> 1. SMP
> 2. NON-SMP
>
> I've decided to stick with custom build non-smp version and the thing is:
> - i don't need cache - a
On 7/30/2015 16:30 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 31/07/2015 3:48 a.m., Mike wrote:
On 7/27/2015 17:25 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 28/07/2015 8:38 a.m., Mike wrote:
Running into an issue, using the squid.conf entry
dns_nameservers 72.x.x.x 72.x.y.y
These are different servers (under our control)
Just a basic question. I have a 3.5.0.4 forward proxy setup with basic
authentication for my MDM proxy (iphones). All iphones are set with the global
proxy and identical user-name/password. They will be on an LTE network and
will be switching IP's often. The forward proxy user-name/password
On 31/07/2015 3:48 a.m., Mike wrote:
> On 7/27/2015 17:25 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 28/07/2015 8:38 a.m., Mike wrote:
>>> Running into an issue, using the squid.conf entry
>>> dns_nameservers 72.x.x.x 72.x.y.y
>>>
>>> These are different servers (under our control) for the purpose of
>>> filte
On 31/07/2015 3:36 a.m., Michael Monette wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/2015 5:20 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>>> Found this post asking the same question:
>>> http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-Ldap-Authen-AD-how-to-make-authentication-persistent-td3604487.html
>>>
>>> and it
>>>
>>>
On 31/07/2015 2:49 a.m., Posta Esterna wrote:
> Thanx..
>
> I don't understand a something...
>
> Where do i need to find Samba? On the Proxy or on the AD Server?
AD server is the server. Samba contains parts that are clients. Winbind,
nmblookup, smbclient, and the ntlm_auth helper are the clien
Hi,
I have a problem with squid setup (squid version 3.5.6, built from source,
centos 6.6)
I've tried 2 options:
1. SMP
2. NON-SMP
I've decided to stick with custom build non-smp version and the thing is:
- i don't need cache - any kind of it
- I have DNS cache just for that
- squid has to listen
On 7/27/2015 17:25 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 28/07/2015 8:38 a.m., Mike wrote:
Running into an issue, using the squid.conf entry
dns_nameservers 72.x.x.x 72.x.y.y
These are different servers (under our control) for the purpose of
filtering than listed in resolv.conf (which are out of our cont
On 7/29/2015 5:20 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Found this post asking the same question:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-Ldap-Authen-AD-how-to-make-authentication-persistent-td3604487.html
and it
There were two suggestions that stood out:
There used to be a "authenticat
Thanx..
I don't understand a something...
Where do i need to find Samba? On the Proxy or on the AD Server?
I don't think i have to create a Samba server on the Proxy... is it true?
So how can i tell Squid to connect to the right Samba Server?
Il 24/07/2015 15.50, Amos Jeffries ha scritto:
On 30/07/2015 8:08 p.m., FredB wrote:
>
>>
>> Well. Yes an 3.4 has a serious CVE that needs releasing. So it will
>> be a
>> thing this weekend.
>>
>> But no other bug fixes in the past few months qualify as security
>> issues. So yes you need to be moving on to 3.5. Especially if you are
>> using
>
> Well. Yes an 3.4 has a serious CVE that needs releasing. So it will
> be a
> thing this weekend.
>
> But no other bug fixes in the past few months qualify as security
> issues. So yes you need to be moving on to 3.5. Especially if you are
> using the ssl-bump features.
>
> Amos
>
So, no
15 matches
Mail list logo