Hi Joel, et al.,
As a verndor having implemented the encapsulation *put the Alternate Marking
encodings in the Destination Option preceding an SRH* [RFC 9343], I regard the
encapsulation *put the Alternate Marking encodings in the SRH TLV*
[draft-fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark] as a burden.
Note
Hi Giuseppe, Haoyu,
Thank you for the response and explanation.
AFAIK, there is no precedent to standardize two or more data planes for one
purpose, of course, if the SPRING WG has (rough) consensus to create such a
precedent, that's ok for me.
For your reference, there was a good example i
Thanks to WG Chairs for initiate such an interesting discussion.
I'd like to share my thoughts on this, please see inline...
Original
From: JoelHalpern
To: SPRING WG List ;
Date: 2023年02月22日 22:38
Subject: [spring] Usage of DoH vs SRH TLVs
___
Congrats to Jim!
Congrats to Alvaro!
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: AndrewAlston-IETF
To: spring@ietf.org ;
Date: 2023年03月28日 08:43
Subject: [spring] Changes of AD/Chairs
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.o
I agree with Matthew.
Note that ZTE has also implemented S-BFD for SR Policy (both SR-MPLS and SRv6).
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: MatthewBocci(Nokia)
To: Greg Mirsky ;Ketan Talaulikar
;
Cc: spring ;spring-cha...@ietf.org ;
Date: 2023年04月01日 01:23
Subject: Re: [spr
Hi Tal,
Please note that there is an existing draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiao-spring-srv6-checksum/
which attempts to address the problem you found and another one described in
the penultimate paragraph of the Introduction section, in a different way not
requiring to
I support progressing this document to publication.
There were multiple reviews on this draft and it seems all the comments have
been addressed by the authors.
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: YisongLiu
To: Joel Halpern ;SPRING WG List ;
Date: 2024年01月25日 12:57
Subject: [spring] Re： Fwd:
I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft (as a contributor).
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: AlvaroRetana
To: draft-ietf-spring-...@ietf.org ;
Cc: SPRING WG List ;spring-cha...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2024年04月23日 23:40
Subject: [spring] IPR Disclosures for draft-ietf-spring-bfd
D
Thank you Ketan!
Your explanation is clear to me.
Cheers,
Xiao Min
Original
From: KetanTalaulikar
To: 肖敏10093570;
Cc: gregimir...@gmail.com
;draft-ietf-spring-...@ietf.org
;spring@ietf.org
;spring-cha...@ietf.org ;m...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2024年10月24日 16:05
Subject: [spring] Re: Shepherd revi
Hi Ketan,
Pardon me to chime in. Cc MPLS mailing list.
I'm discussing with Greg on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid,
attempting to address his concern on whether there is a state of Path SID on
the endpoint.
Your help is much appreciated. Please see inline.
< major > SR Policy scale
Hi Alvaro,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft (as a contributor).
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: AlvaroRetana
To: draft-ietf-spring-...@ietf.org ;
Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org ;spring-cha...@ietf.org
;spring@ietf.org ;
Date: 2024年12月03日 03:55
Subject: Re: IPR Declaration
Dear authors,
I have a few comments on your draft "Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP".
* Section 4.1, the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option is a new DHCPv6 option introduced by
this draft, I suggest to provide an explicit list of DHCP messages in which
this new DHCPv6 option can be carried in. A typo needs t
Hi Weiqiang,
Thank you for addressing my comments.
Looking forward to the updated version of this draft.
Cheers,
Xiao Min
Original
From: WeiqiangCheng
To: 肖敏10093570;
Cc: spring ;buraglio
;spring-chairs ;dhcwg
;dhc-chairs ;linchangwang.04414
;danvoyerwork ;zhanggeng
;hanruibo ;
Date: 2025
Dear authors,
I have a few comments on your draft "Distribute SRv6 Locator by DHCP".
* Section 4.1, the IA_SRV6_LOCATOR option is a new DHCPv6 option introduced by
this draft, I suggest to provide an explicit list of DHCP messages in which
this new DHCPv6 option can be carried in. A typo needs t
14 matches
Mail list logo
