Hi Tal,
Please note that there is an existing draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiao-spring-srv6-checksum/
which attempts to address the problem you found and another one described in
the penultimate paragraph of the Introduction section, in a different way not
requiring to update RFC 8200.
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: TalMizrahi <tal.mizrahi....@gmail.com>
To: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>;i...@ietf.org <i...@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年08月03日 15:03
Subject: [IPv6] New draft: L4 Checksums in SRv6
Hi,
This new draft introduces a proposed update to [RFC8200], which is
intended to address compressed segment lists in SRv6
[draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression].
Link to the new draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mizrahi-spring-l4-checksum-srv6/
There was some discussion in the SPRING mailing list about this issue.
The current thread is intended to allow a wider discussion that
includes the 6MAN working group, and therefore the new draft includes
a wider background.
Feedback will be welcome.
Cheers,
Tal.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
i...@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
