Hi WG, I support the adoption of the draft. It avoids to use two EHs in SRv6
case, which not only reduces packet overhead, but also is nicer for implement.
SRH TLV also has better network compatibilit___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.i
Hi，WG，
I think this is a very valuable solution for the SRv6 location for the CPE
scenario. As a vendor, we have tested this solution in our lab, which is easy
to implement.
> From: "Weiqiang Cheng"
> Date: Tue, May 23, 2023, 18:49
> Subject: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for
> draft-c
Hi WG,
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
> From: "Alvaro Retana"
> Date: Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 20:00
> Subject: [spring] spring WG Adoption Call for
> draft-cheng-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-by-dhcp
> To:
> Cc: ,
> "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
> Dear WG:
>
>
> This message starts a two-week a
I support the publication of the draft.
As a vendor, we have implemented it with our device. It is very useful.
We are eager for it to be standardized.
> From: "Joel Halpern"
> Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024, 22:28
> Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compres
