I support the publication of the draft.
As a vendor, we have implemented it with our device. It is very useful.
We are eager for it to be standardized.
> From: "Joel Halpern"<j...@joelhalpern.com>
> Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024, 22:28
> Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
> To: "SPRING WG List"<spring@ietf.org>
> (One of the other chairs pointed out that this had not gone to
the list. So forwarding the announcement.)
> This tarts the WG last call on the above document.
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
>
>
>
-------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:
> IETF WG state changed for
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
> Resent-Date:
> Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:25:02 -0800 (PST)
> Resent-From:
> alias-boun...@ietf.org
> Resent-To:
> bruno.decra...@orange.com, aretana.i...@gmail.com,
j...@joelhalpern.com, pengshup...@huawei.com
> Date:
> Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:25:02 -0800
> From:
> IETF Secretariat
> <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org><ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>
> To:
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compress...@ietf.org,
spring-cha...@ietf.org
>
>
>
The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression has
been changed
>
to "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/
>
>
Comment:
>
This starts the WG last call for this document. Please comment
with support
>
or opposition, and explanation of your perspective. Silence is not
consent,
>
and just "support" or "oppose" is not helpful. This call will run
through
>
the end of Feb 4, 2024. Yours, Joel Halpern - responsible Spring
co-chair
>
>
PS: I would appreciate a document shepherd from the WG for the
bnext step. Email me if you are willing.
>
> _______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
