Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01

Hi Dhruv, The I.D will be refreshed and updated once submissions reopen. Apologies for the extended delay in updating it .. Rgds. From: Dhruv Dhody Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:12 AM To: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-y...@ietf.org , SPRING WG Subject: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-01 H

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Thanks, -- Kamran (as a Contributor of this doc) From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 at 10:11 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-repli

Re: [spring] Mail regarding draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang

Alvaro, >> This document expired in March/2023, We have some update ready last IETF but it was held internally within authors for further discussions. Will resurrect the expired draft early next week – alongwith the changes. Apologies for the delay. Dhruv, >> There is a long pending technical req

Re: [spring] Mail regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang

Alvaro, Will post an update to this I.D early next week. Apologies for the delay. Rgds. From: Alvaro Retana Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 at 1:14 PM To: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-y...@ietf.org Cc: SPRING WG List , spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang Dear

Re: [spring] IPR poll for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Rgds, -- Kamran On 2019-12-16, 12:31 PM, "spring on behalf of Satish Mynam" wrote: As contributor, I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Thanks, Satish On 12/5/19, 8:50 AM,

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

I support. For SRv6-based L2/EVPN VPWS implementations/deployments, it is important to have an early allocation of new code point from the “Protocol Number” registry for “Ethernet”. From: spring on behalf of Dirk Steinberg Date: Monday, January 6, 2020 at 4:26 PM To: "bruno.decra...@orange.

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

I support the adoption of this draft. Rgds, - Kamran From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Monday, July 13, 2020 at 11:39 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang Dear WG: This email begins a 2 we

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang

I support the adoption of this draft. Rgds, - Kamran From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Monday, July 13, 2020 at 5:52 PM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang Dear WG: This email begins a 2 week WG

Re: [spring] draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang has an XML syntax error breaking the YANG validation chain

Thanks Eric for pointing out. We will fix this right away. On 2020-07-15, 5:15 AM, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" wrote: Dear authors, Nothing dramatic but the three YANG modules included in this I-D start with an invalid syntax (the trailing '-->' is wrong): file "ietf-srv6-ty...@

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

Thanks Dhuruv for your support and useful review/comments. We will discuss within authors and incorporate comments accordingly. On 2020-07-25, 1:20 PM, "spring on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" wrote: Hi WG, I support the adoption of this work and I have thoughts on how to improve the do

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang

Thanks Dhruv, Jeff, and Yingzhen for your comments. The next rev of the model will take care of NMDA style as well as simplify the grouping. On 2020-07-25, 7:53 PM, "spring on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" wrote: Hi, I agree with Dhruv's comments that there should not be separate configur

Re: [spring] IPR Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Hello Jim/Chairs, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document other than the ones that have been already disclosed. Rgds -- Kamran From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Sunday, April 11, 2021 at 6:34 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] IPR Call for

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Looking at the latest rev of this important draft, I support the publication of it. Rgds, -- Kamran From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 2:57 PM To: spring@ietf.org Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-p

Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

I fully support the working group adoption of this doc, and would like to highlight: * There are already several hardware/vendor implementations for CSID with line rate performance. * As described in the section 11 of the CSID draft

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang-00.txt

Hello all, This new draft specifies SRv6 YANG model (re: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming) for the following: a- SRv6 common types - End - Transit - Security rules - Counters - SID opcode typedefs etc. b- SRv6 base:

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming-02.txt

Hello all, This revision (-02) of the doc has the following updates: a- EVPN End functions/behaviors (see draft-dawra-idr-srv6-vpn-02 for related BGP signaling) as well as illustrations. b- New End.DT46 (overlay) function to allow use of a common SID for both v4 and v6 address families. c

Re: [spring] [mpls] The MPLS WG has placed draft-farrel-mpls-sfc in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

I second the concerns raised by Xiaohu, Francois, and Zafar. From: mpls on behalf of "Zafar Ali (zali)" Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 7:02 PM To: "Francois Clad (fclad)" , "徐小虎(义先)" Cc: mpls , SPRING WG List , "s...@ietf.org" , draft-farrel-mpls-sfc , mpls-chairs , mpls Subject: Re: [mp

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: SPRING - rechartering discussion

+1 I also believe that SR-policy falls under the charter of SPRING WG and not TEAS. Thx -- Kamran From: spring on behalf of Robert Raszuk Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 11:59 PM To: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" Cc: "spring@ietf.org" , "t...@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: SPR

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

Support (as co-author) Rgds, - Kamran From: spring on behalf of "Jose Liste (jliste)" Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 12:43 PM To: Rob Shakir , SPRING WG List Cc: "Jose Liste (jliste)" Subject: Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy Supp

Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

I am also not aware of any other IPRs than the ones already disclosed under datatracker (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy) Rgds, -- Kamran From: "Francois Clad (fclad)" Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 3:06 AM To: Rob Shakir ,

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-thomas-spring-sr-policy-yang-00.txt

Hello SPRING WG, We have submitted a new draft (draft-thomas-spring-sr-policy-yang) that defines the base YANG model for SR policies configuration and management. This new I.D is a companion document to WG's "Segment Routing Policy Architecture" spec as defined under draft-ietf-spring-segment-r

Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

I am not aware of any IPR other than the ones already disclosed. Rgds, - Kamran From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com" Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 2:50 PM To: SPRING WG Cc: "draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-

[spring] Canceled: draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang: Discuss Updates before Montreal IETF

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Kamran Raza (skraza):MAILTO:skr...@cisco.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Zhibo Hu:M AILTO:huzh...@huawei.com ATTENDEE;ROLE

[spring] FW: draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang: Discuss Updates before Montreal IETF

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=Kamran Raza (skraza):MAILTO:skr...@cisco.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=spring@iet f.org:MAILTO:spring@ietf.org ATTENDEE

Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6.

I agree; there is no need for a new encapsulation. -- Kamran From: spring on behalf of "Voyer, Daniel" Date: Monday, September 2, 2019 at 10:25 AM To: Dirk Steinberg , SPRING WG List , Rob Shakir Subject: Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6. Hi, I agree with Dirk. The SRv6 fulfills our requirements f

[spring] Re New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang-05.txt]

Hello all, We have uploaded a new rev of SRv6 YANG. The main changes in this revision are: - Renaming function “opcode” to function-value. - New cfg items for encapsulation: hop-limit { propagate | value } and traffic-class { propagate | value } - Extended static model to add EVPN behaviors

[spring] WG adoption request [Re: Re New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang-05.txt]]

2019-10-30, 9:23 AM, "Kamran Raza (skraza)" wrote: Hello all, We have uploaded a new rev of SRv6 YANG. The main changes in this revision are: - Renaming function “opcode” to function-value. - New cfg items for encapsulation: hop-limit { propagate | value } an

[spring] Updated Rev [Re: New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang-02.txt]

SPRING WG, We have uploaded a new rev of SRTE policy YANG draft - the main changes from prev rev are: - Adding some new clarification texts in couple of sections - Renaming of some leaves/containers in the YANG tree Please take a look and provide any comment. Rgds. -- Kamran (on behalf of a

[spring] WG Adoption request for sr-policy YANG [Re: Updated Rev [Re: New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang-02.txt]]

SPRING Chairs, The authors believe that sr-policy YANG draft is an important work and already in a good shape for adoption. Hence, at this time we are formally requesting the WG adoption for this draft. Rgds, -- Kamran (on behalf of authors) On 2019-11-04, 10:00 PM, "Kamran Raza (s

[spring] WG adoption request [Re: Re New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang-05.txt]]

for adoption. Rgds, -- Kamran (on behalf of authors)  On 2019-10-30, 9:23 AM, "Kamran Raza (skraza)" wrote: Hello all, We have uploaded a new rev of SRv6 YANG. The main changes in this revision are: - Renamin

[spring] WG Adoption request for sr-policy YANG [Re: Updated Rev [Re: New Version Notification for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang-02.txt]]

adoption. Rgds, -- Kamran (on behalf of authors)  On 2019-11-04, 10:00 PM, "Kamran Raza (skraza)" wrote: SPRING WG, We have uploaded a new rev of SRTE policy YANG draft - the main changes from prev rev are: - Adding some new cla

Re: [spring] SRv6 Network Programming and Link Local Source Addresses

Bob, >>I was thinking that unless network programming has text that might cause one >>to think it overrides the defined behavior from rfc4291 for link-local >>addresses, I am not sure it has to be mentioned. I agree with this. I'd rather not add in net-pgm because If we were to start adding tex

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang-04.txt

har Hussain , Jaganbabu Rajamanickam (jrajaman) , Kamran Raza (skraza) , Katsuhiro Horiba , Satoru Matsushima , Sonal Agarwal , Kamran Raza (skraza) , Xufeng Liu , Zhibo Hu Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang-04.txt A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-spring-s

[spring] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-04.txt

Dhruv, This update on sr-policy YANG fixes the XYM extraction issue: https://www.yangcatalog.org/yangvalidator?draft=draft-ietf-spring-sr-policy-yang-04 This should now unblock your draft draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang as well. Apologies for the delay in fixing this … -- Kamran From: i