Thanks Dhruv, Jeff, and Yingzhen for your comments.
The next rev of the model will take care of NMDA style as well as simplify the
grouping.
On 2020-07-25, 7:53 PM, "spring on behalf of Yingzhen Qu"
<spring-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of yingzhen...@futurewei.com> wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Dhruv's comments that there should not be separate
configuration and state trees.
Also "grouping" is overly used in the model, and I'd suggest the authors
remove some groups when updating the draft.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On 7/25/20, 10:23 AM, "spring on behalf of Dhruv Dhody"
<spring-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of dhruv.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this work and I have thoughts on how to
improve the document -
Some questions/comments -
- Can the title of the I-D be improved?
- Why do you have the config and the state trees separately in Figures
1 and 2? That's out of fashion with NMDA!
- I hope this model is applicable for both the headend router as well
as for the controller. If yes, we should highlight that as well as
make sure the YANG model takes care of this. For example, counters,
forwarding, etc
- The node-capabilities are marked as read-only, but an operator may
want to disable or enable these right?
Suggestions for improving YANG -
- Update copyright year
- path-attrs-cmn is described as "Path properties -common for v4/v6",
in that case, is this the right yang model for it? and should it be in
the generic SR model instead?
- Typedef for algorithm could be useful, it is unit32 here but uint8
in draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang
- What is the purpose of the empty containers end, end_psp, end_usp,
end_psp_usp, end_usd, end_psp_usd, end_usp_usd, end_psp_usp_usd? Are
they placeholders for something?
- Run this "pyang -f yang --keep-comments --yang-line-length 69
<FILE>" to help you with formatting the yang model.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 3:22 AM James Guichard
<james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
>
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-raza-spring-srv6-yang%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7C0b316d999f4f41b2edb008d830bf6a89%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637312945993728664&sdata=TgKml9vtVT8T4Gak6DUmVaNJ14BAF7cyfccIv4oqm1o%3D&reserved=0
ending Monday 27th July 2020.
>
>
>
> Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into
the WG. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack
thereof). Silence will not be considered consent.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jim, Joel & Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
>
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7C0b316d999f4f41b2edb008d830bf6a89%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637312945993728664&sdata=nKQLkDrLqa%2FkXT6WDFdXJKAf%2FSuaay1paSp6VHfScPg%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&data=02%7C01%7Cyingzhen.qu%40futurewei.com%7C0b316d999f4f41b2edb008d830bf6a89%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637312945993728664&sdata=nKQLkDrLqa%2FkXT6WDFdXJKAf%2FSuaay1paSp6VHfScPg%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
