C4291].", I‘d like to know where to Signal in the network? Is any new
protocol needed to signal?
Best regards
Chongfeng
xie...@chinatelecom.cn
From: Jen Linkova
Date: 2022-09-17 16:00
To: 6man; spring
CC: 6man Chairs; draft-ietf-6man-sids.authors; spring-chairs
Subject: [spring] 6MAN WGLC: draft
scribed
in Section 5. Is this just for security control at the border of the domain to
avoid the leakage of SRv6 information?
Best regards
Chongfeng
xie...@chinatelecom.cn
From: Suresh Krishnan
Date: 2022-10-03 10:34
To: Joel Halpern
CC: Fred Baker; Chongfeng Xie; IPv6 List; spring
Sub
Hi authors and all,
I support the adoption of this draft, since it is about Alternate Marking
Method for SRv6, I think Spring wg is the suitable place to do it.
In addition, section 2.1 mentions the Controlled domain, it looks a little
abrupt, I wander whether it can be placed in a separate
+1. Congratulations to Jim and Alvaro.
Best regards
Chongfeng
发件人： Cheng Li
发送时间： 2023-03-28 10:51
收件人： Greg Mirsky; Andrew Alston - IETF
抄送： spring@ietf.org
主题： [spring]答复: Changes of AD/Chairs
+1, Congratulations to Jim and thank you for the work for SPRING and SFC WG.
Congratulations to A
this way in practice, so I propose 4G/5G can
be erased in section 3.
Best regards
Chongfeng
xie...@chinatelecom.cn
From: Weiqiang Cheng
Date: 2023-07-14 14:22
To: wangaijun; aretana.ietf; spring
CC: draft-cheng-spring-distribute-srv6-locator-by-d...@ietf.org; spring-chairs
Subject: Re
Hi，
I agree with the resolution proposed by the authors. I think the issues can be
closed ASAP. The current progress of this draft is a little slow, I suggest
the subsequent progress can be appropriately accelerated.
Many thanks to Chairs and authors.
Chongfeng
---
From: sp
Hi Ketan,
Thank you for your comments and questions, please see my feedback
inline[Chongfeng]:
>Hello Chongfeng/Authors,
>I understand that the problem statement that you are looking to address is
>to provide a connectivity service for two IPv4 hosts over a service
>provider network with IPv
Hi Acee,
Many thanks for your review and suggestions. I agree with them and will update
the draft accordingly.
Please see some further replies inline [Chongfeng]:
From: spring On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2024 2:42 AM
To: Lsr ; t...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject
Hi Joel and all,
I think this document is mature enough and support its WG last call.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Joel Halpern
Date: 2024-01-22 22:28
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
(One of the other chairs pointed out t
Hi folks，
I support the adoption of this draft.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Yingzhen Qu
Date: 2024-02-10 03:30
To: RTGWG; spring; rtgwg-chairs;
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection
Subject: WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection
(02/09/24 - 02/24/2
. This presents both challenges and opportunities for collaboration,
particularly within the IETF.
Time:
11:30 - 13:00 Tuesday, July 23, 2024 (America-Pacific Time - Vancouver)
Location: Tennyson
Chairs:
Chongfeng Xie (chongfeng@foxmail.com)
Diego R. Lopez (diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com)
Linda
Hello everyone,
A side meeting on "Telecom Cloud Services and Operations" will be held at
11:30am on Tuesday, we sincerely welcome you to join and have an open and
pleasant discussion on this topic. Below are the related information and
materials of this meeting.
Time: 11:30 - 13:00 Tuesda
Hi Ketan,
Thank you for your comments.
Draft-dong-spring-sr-4map6-segments illustrates IPv4/IPv6 address mapping and
packet transformation from the perspective of SRv6, the new SID mainly deal
with how to generate new IPv6 headers based on the information of IPv4 packets,
it does not involve
Hello, folks,
I support this document to progress to IESG.
Best regards
Chongfeng
xie...@chinatelecom.cn
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Date: 2021-03-05 01:45
To: spring@ietf.org
CC: draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr
Dear WG,
We
Hi，Jie，
I think this work is useful and support its progress in spring or other WGs.
However, I have some concerns about the term of "IETF slicing”, from the
perspective of operator, the terms of “IETF slicing” and “3GPP slicing” may be
confusing, there should be a universal set of terms of slic
Hi, folks,
As one member of design team, I am pleased that two drafts has been produced
by the members with more than 1 year effort. Support has also been received
from outside of the DT during the past year, thanks. From the perspective of
one operator, I believe that the standardization of
collaboration, particularly
within the IETF.
Time: 19:00 - 20:00 Tuesday, Novermber 5, 2024 (UTC Time - Dublin)
Location: Wicklow Meeting Room 4
Chairs:
Chongfeng Xie (chongfeng@foxmail.com)
Linda Dunbar (linda.dun...@futurewei.com)
Join the meeting click on the link:
https://ietf.webex.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
