Re: [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy

2024-05-03 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Hi spring, pim WG, I support WGLC of this document. Regards, Samuel From: spring On Behalf Of Michael McBride Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 4:37 AM To: p...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy Hello good people, Today begins a two week wglc for h

Re: [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy

2024-05-03 Thread Gyan Mishra
I support publication. Thanks Gyan On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:37 PM Michael McBride < michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com> wrote: > Hello good people, > > > > Today begins a two week wglc for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy-08. > The related (normative) replicat

[spring] FW: Last Call: (Path Monitoring System/Head-end based MPLS Ping and Traceroute in Inter-domain Segment Routing Networks) to Proposed Standard

2024-05-03 Thread James Guichard
Copying SPRING WG for transparency. Thanks! Jim From: The IESG Date: Friday, May 3, 2024 at 11:37 AM To: IETF-Announce Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk , draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-...@ietf.org , James Guichard , mpls-cha...@ietf.org , m...@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: (Path Monitoring

Re: [spring] Follow-up comments on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam

2024-05-03 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear All, I've shared my comments about the draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam-12. It seems like the latest version 13 does not address my questions. Please consider these comments as part of IETF LC. Regards, Greg On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 5:06 AM Greg Mirsky wrote: > Dear, Authors, WG Chai

Re: [spring] [pim] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy

2024-05-03 Thread Rishabh Parekh
Andrew, I will fix the nits in the next revision. -> should "path" and "paths" be capitalized when in context of "Candidate > path" ?. Related, some text has "candidate path" and others has "Candidate > path". > > > I will make all occurrence consistent as "Candidate Path(s)" > > Section 4.1.1