As a co-author, I support the progressing of this draft.
Jeffrey
Juniper Business Use Only
From: pim On Behalf Of Rishabh Parekh
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 5:17 PM
To: Michael McBride
Cc: p...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pim] [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy
[Exter
I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
Kind regards,
iLya Varlashkin
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 08:17 Greg Mirsky wrote:
> I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 5:39 PM Alvaro Retana
> wrote:
>
>> Dear auth
Being one of the contributors to this draft, I support.
Thanks,
Tanmoy
From: spring On Behalf Of Michael McBride
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 7:37 PM
To: p...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy
Some people who received this message don't often get
As a co-author I support LC
Thanks
Hooman
From: spring On Behalf Of Michael McBride
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2024 10:37 PM
To: p...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy
Some people who received this message don't often get email from
michael.mcbr..
Hi PIM, SPRING
I've read the latest version and support WGLC. I find the content in the
document a clear read for the solution and it’s nice to see this solution
documents getting to a polished state. The underlying replication segment RFC
from SPRING was a good milestone, and PCE+IDR is active
Alvaro,I’m not aware for any IPR that applies to the draft.Cheers,JeffOn May 2, 2024, at 07:48, iLya Varlashkin wrote:I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.Kind regards,iLya VarlashkinOn Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 08:17 Greg Mirsky wrote:I am not aware of any