On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 11:35 AM Boris Hassanov wrote:
> Hi Alvaro and all,
>
> Yes, I support the publishing of this document.
>
> Few comments after the review:
> 1) 1.Introduction
> 1.1) "SRv6 makes use of the SRH which is a new type of Routing Extension
> Header." -> IMO, would be better to
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:29 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I support adoption. Please find some non-blocking comments that authors can
> work on.
>
> # Minor
>
> - Should you call out RFC 8986 Network programming in the Introduction?
>
> - Section 2, it gives the impression that the control
scuss for addition in the next version of the draft.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
>
>
> From: Alvaro Retana
> Date: Thursday, August 8, 2024 at 11:47 AM
> To: Yingzhen Qu
> Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org
> , spring-ch
st 8, 2024 at 11:47 AM
> To: Yingzhen Qu
> Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org
> , spring-cha...@ietf.org
> , SPRING WG
> Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security
> (ends Aug/19)
>
> On August 7, 2024 at 3:07:12 PM, Yingzhen Qu
Hi!
This message closes the adoption call for this document. There has been
enough support to adopt the draft.
Authors: You received comments from several people in this thread. Please
explicitly respond to them, and, as needed, reflect any change in future
versions. I don’t believe any of th
)
Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org
, spring-cha...@ietf.org
, SPRING WG , Yingzhen Qu
Subject: Re: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for
draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security (ends Aug/19)
On August 19, 2024 at 1:03:58 PM, Zafar Ali wrote:
Zafar:
Hi!
> I support the adoption c
On August 19, 2024 at 1:03:58 PM, Zafar Ali wrote:
Zafar:
Hi!
> I support the adoption call.
>
> However, I believe the document should be “informational.”
Do you have a specific reason?
The intended status should depend on the content and its relationship
to other documents. It is too earl
: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security
(ends Aug/19)
On August 7, 2024 at 3:07:12 PM, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
Hi!
> The current intended status of this document is "Standards Track", is this
> intentional?
Yes, it is. The document is intended to be a "compa
Hi,
I support adoption. Please find some non-blocking comments that authors can
work on.
# Minor
- Should you call out RFC 8986 Network programming in the Introduction?
- Section 2, it gives the impression that the control and management plane
are not in scope but we do have section 6.4. Update
Hello,
I support adoption as a WG document, it is valuable to have a
separate security considerations document - this provides a good start
cheers,
Eduard
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:04 PM Alvaro Retana wrote:
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for
> ddraft-bdmgct-spring
Boris,
Thank you for this detailed review. We will incorporate the suggestions
into our next version.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 11:35 AM Boris Hassanov wrote:
> Hi Alvaro and all,
>
> Yes, I support the publishing of this document.
>
> Few comments after the review:
> 1) 1.Introduction
> 1.1) "S
Hi,
I read the document and supports it's adoption as WG document.
Regards
Nic
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alvaro Retana
Gesendet: Montag, 5. August 2024 15:04
An: SPRING WG
Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org
Betreff: [spring] WG Adoption Call fo
On August 10, 2024 at 12:35:05 PM, Boris Hassanov wrote:
Hi Boris!
Thanks for the review!
...
> Will the authors propose any kind of solution here besides the problem
> statement?
The intent of the draft is to document Security Considerations related
to SRv6 as it is defined. Along the same l
Hi Alvaro and all,
Yes, I support the publishing of this document.
Few comments after the review:
1) 1.Introduction
1.1) "SRv6 makes use of the SRH which is a new type of Routing Extension
Header." -> IMO, would be better to write: "SRv6 may use the SRH which is a new
type of Routing Extension
Hi Chairs,
I reviewed the draft and consider it provides some necessary SRv6 security
considerations. It seems to be a good start for the draft to be processed as WG
draft.
Best regards,
Xueyan
Original
From: AlvaroRetana
To: SPRING WG ;
Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org
;
Hello,
I have read this draft several times, and it is a very valuable document, thus
I support its adoption.
I am eager to see some elements listed in the "Topics for further
consideration" developed in the future final RFC stemming from this document.
Best regards,
Antoine
> -Origina
On August 7, 2024 at 3:07:12 PM, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
Hi!
> The current intended status of this document is "Standards Track", is this
> intentional?
Yes, it is. The document is intended to be a "companion" to the
existing documents.
However, the status is not "written in stone": it can be chan
The current intended status of this document is "Standards Track", is this
intentional?
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 6:04 AM Alvaro Retana wrote:
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for
> ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the
> Abst
Without any hat, I support this important document.
Time permitting, I also intend to review it.
-éric
From: Alvaro Retana
Date: Monday, 5 August 2024 at 15:05
To: SPRING WG
Cc: draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-secur...@ietf.org
, spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-
Hi,
I support adoption.
Regards,
Mark.
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024, 23:04 Alvaro Retana, wrote:
> Dear WG:
>
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for
> ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the
> Abstract:
>
>This document discusses security considerations in SRv6
Support the adoption. Let’s work on it together 😊
Cheng
From: Ron Bonica
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2024 4:30 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security
Chairs,
This is an important document. I support its adoption
Chairs,
This is an important document. I support its adoption.
=
Dear WG:
This message starts a two-week adoption call for
ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the
Abstract:
This document discusses security considerations
22 matches
Mail list logo
