Hi! This message closes the adoption call for this document. There has been enough support to adopt the draft.
Authors: You received comments from several people in this thread. Please explicitly respond to them, and, as needed, reflect any change in future versions. I don’t believe any of the comments prevent adoption. Please go ahead and publish draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security. Thanks! Alvaro. On August 5, 2024 at 9:04:14 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.i...@gmail.com) wrote: Dear WG: This message starts a two-week adoption call for ddraft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security, ending on August/19. From the Abstract: This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 networks, including the potential threats and the possible mitigation methods. The document does not define any new security protocols or extensions to existing protocols. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bdmgct-spring-srv6-security/ Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote. If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document. WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document. Note that the IESG requested that the WG deliver a document covering security considerations for SRv6. This document is intended to satisfy that request. Thanks! Alvaro (for the Chairs)
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
