Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC] Support for building with Meson

2018-03-23 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On 22/03/18 14:18, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: > Here is the result of work in progress with replacing autotools with > Meson. I am sending the patches on the ML for easier visualization, but > if you want to try it, I would really recommend pulling from my gitlab > repositories, e.g.: > > $ g

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC] Support for building with Meson

2018-03-23 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On 23/03/18 07:58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: >> Hi Eduardo, >> >> >> Thanks for sharing. >> >> Out of curiosity, I understand why you want to add Meson, but why remove >> autotools right away? > > Note in particular that th

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC] Support for building with Meson

2018-03-23 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
On 23/03/18 07:51, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > > Thanks for sharing. > > Out of curiosity, I understand why you want to add Meson, but why remove > autotools right away? > > In my c3d build branch, I made sure both make and autotools could coexist. > I knew it was going

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC] Support for building with Meson

2018-03-23 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:51:41AM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > > Thanks for sharing. > > Out of curiosity, I understand why you want to add Meson, but why remove > autotools right away? Note in particular that this will make it impossible to build on a RHEL-7 platfor

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC] Support for building with Meson

2018-03-23 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
Hi Eduardo, Thanks for sharing. Out of curiosity, I understand why you want to add Meson, but why remove autotools right away? In my c3d build branch, I made sure both make and autotools could coexist. > ddd@ptitpuce[c3d-build] spice> make help > Specific top-level target: > make gitclean