On 16 June 2011 20:47, John A. Sullivan III
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:54 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Su
On 16/06/2011 19:26, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:19 -0400, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
The first test of the signed drivers was on W2K8. Then it struck me
that they might be signed sp
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:54 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +02
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:19 -0400, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > The first test of the signed drivers was on W2K8. Then it struck me
> > that they might be signed specifically for W7 so I tried i
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:54 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 03:20:46PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 16 June 2011 16:53, Alon Levy wrote:
> >
> > The only difference that should bother anything is the creation and signing
> > of qxl.cat, signing of qxl.sys and signing of qxldd.dll. The
> > easiest route I thought was just to
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>
> The first test of the signed drivers was on W2K8. Then it struck me
> that they might be signed specifically for W7 so I tried it there but
> with the same results. I'll try resigning the W7 driver
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:22 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:54 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100,
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:54 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > > > On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- w
On 16 June 2011 16:53, Alon Levy wrote:
>
> The only difference that should bother anything is the creation and signing
> of qxl.cat, signing of qxl.sys and signing of qxldd.dll. The
> easiest route I thought was just to send you prebuilt and signed drivers, but
> you can do that yourself, the i
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:50 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill
> > > > wrote
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:44:45AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:50 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:50 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > > > On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- w
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:54 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > > > On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- w
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:42:07AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > > On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > >> Hello, a
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 01:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> Hello, all. We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and
> > >> feet
> > >> a
On 16 June 2011 00:34, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
>> On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
>> > - Original Message -
>> >> Hello, all. We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and
>> >> feet
>> >> as we are intrigu
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hello, all. We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and
> >> feet
> >> as we are intrigued with the possibilities. But, we've hit a few
On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Hello, all. We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and
>> feet
>> as we are intrigued with the possibilities. But, we've hit a few
>> rocks
>> along the way!
>>
>> The immediate problems with our two test W
- Original Message -
> Hello, all. We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and
> feet
> as we are intrigued with the possibilities. But, we've hit a few
> rocks
> along the way!
>
> The immediate problems with our two test Windows installations
> (Windows7
> and Windows Server
Hello, all. We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and feet
as we are intrigued with the possibilities. But, we've hit a few rocks
along the way!
The immediate problems with our two test Windows installations (Windows7
and Windows Server 2008 running as KVM guests in Fedora 15) using
21 matches
Mail list logo
