On 15 June 2011 21:11, --[ UxBoD ]-- <ux...@splatnix.net> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Hello, all.  We have recently jumped into SPICE with both hands and
>> feet
>> as we are intrigued with the possibilities.  But, we've hit a few
>> rocks
>> along the way!
>>
>> The immediate problems with our two test Windows installations
>> (Windows7
>> and Windows Server 2008 running as KVM guests in Fedora 15) using the
>> QXL driver is that the pixel depth appears to be 4-bits, the only
>> available resolutions are 640x480 and 800x600, and the mouse is
>> unusably
>> lagged.
>>
>> Here are the details.
>>
>> Spice client compiled from
>> http://www.spice-space.org/download/releases/spice-0.8.1.tar.bz2 on
>> Debian Squeeze.
>>
>> I believe the Windows QXL driver and vdagent were compiled from the
>> same.  Phil, could you please confirm that.
>>
>> KVM is from Fedora 15 yum repositories.
>>
>> Our first attempt on Windows 7 yielded a screen with appropriate
>> pixel
>> depth and quite responsive video however the mouse was nearly
>> unusable.
>> We checked the video driver and it appeared to be using VGA rather
>> than
>> QXL despite:
>>     'spicevmc'>
>>       'virtio' name='com.redhat.spice.0'/>
>>
>>
>>     'tablet' bus='usb'/>
>>     'mouse' bus='ps2'/>
>>     'spice' port='5800' tlsPort='5801' autoport='no'
>>     listen='0.0.0.0'/>
>>
>>       'qxl' vram='65536' heads='1'/>
>>       'pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02'
>>       function='0x0'/>
>>
>>
>> This seemed to be due to the QXL driver being unsigned.  We next put
>> up
>> a Windows Server 2008 wondering if the mouse problem was a Windows 7
>> issue.  We were able to test sign the driver.  Anticipating splendid
>> success, we were deeply disappointed when we still had not only the
>> mouse problem but now saw the pixel depth and resolution problem.
>>
>> We then test signed the QXL driver on Windows 7 and, lo and behold,
>> the
>> same pixel depth and resolution issues appeared now that we were
>> indeed
>> using the QXL driver.
>>
>> What did we do wrong? We would dearly love for this to work and we
>> are
>> sure it must be working for someone if it is being used in
>> production.
>> Thanks - John
>>
>
> John,
>
> Alon (Redhat Dev) has a patch for QEMU which should hopefully fix the 4bpp 
> issue but the binary and necessary libraries he sent me would not run 
> successfully on our server. It was execute and then hang and eventually time 
> out. Perhaps, as discussed, we could build from source though I wonder why 
> that patch has not been fully committed yet?
> --

Is the patch available to try anywhere? I'd like to give it a test and
see what happens.
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to