On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 22:05 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 21:07 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On 07/04/2011 07:33 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:48 +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> > >> On 07/04/2011 05:21 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
>
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 21:07 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 07:33 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:48 +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> >> On 07/04/2011 05:21 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> >>> Very helpful and interesting. I'll respond in-line - John
> >>>
>
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 21:07 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 07:33 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:48 +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> >> On 07/04/2011 05:21 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> >>> Very helpful and interesting. I'll respond in-line - John
> >>>
> >
On 07/04/2011 07:33 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:48 +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 07/04/2011 05:21 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Very helpful and interesting. I'll respond in-line - John
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:38 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:10
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:48 +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 05:21 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Very helpful and interesting. I'll respond in-line - John
> >
> > On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:38 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> >> On 06/30/2011 10:10 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> >>> On 06/30/20
On 07/04/2011 05:21 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Very helpful and interesting. I'll respond in-line - John
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:38 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:10 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400,
Very helpful and interesting. I'll respond in-line - John
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 10:38 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 10:10 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> >>>
> >>> - Origin
On 06/30/2011 10:10 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello, all. I've been using both RDP via TSPlus and SPICE for over a
week now and the practical world results at
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 21:52 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 02:34:15PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A.
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 02:34:15PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > Interesting observation. That i
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > Interesting observation. That is true; we did not create separate VM
> > > definitions for SPICE and TSPlus t
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 09:30 -0400, Marian Krcmarik wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Alon Levy"
> > To: "John A. Sullivan III"
> > Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2011 1:43:44 PM
> > Subje
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 13:43 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:24:59AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 12:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 05:45:34AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:56 +0200,
- Original Message -
> From: "Alon Levy"
> To: "John A. Sullivan III"
> Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2011 1:43:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Unfair comparisons with RDP
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:24:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:24:59AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 12:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 05:45:34AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:56 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:40:41PM
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 12:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 05:45:34AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:56 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:40:41PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 05:45:34AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:56 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:40:41PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:56 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:40:41PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A.
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:40:41PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > Interesting observation. That i
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:05 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > Interesting observation. That is true; we did not create separate VM
> > > definitions for SPICE and TSPlus t
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:18:14AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 15:00 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > Interesting observation. That is true; we did not create separate VM
> > > definitions for SPICE a
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Interesting observation. That is true; we did not create separate VM
> > definitions for SPICE and TSPlus thus the TSPlus environment is using
> > the QXL driver. Wou
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 15:00 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Interesting observation. That is true; we did not create separate VM
> > definitions for SPICE and TSPlus thus the TSPlus environment is using
> > the QXL driver. Would we e
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> Interesting observation. That is true; we did not create separate VM
> definitions for SPICE and TSPlus thus the TSPlus environment is using
> the QXL driver. Would we expect that to have any "supercharging" effect
> on RDP?
>
>
Proba
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:48 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> If I'm correct, you still have some "piece of spice" in your enhanced
> RDP environment too.
> Can you confirm that in your guest definition you maintain
>
>
>
> function='0x0'/>
>
>
> even when you test via TSPLUS?
>
If I'm correct, you still have some "piece of spice" in your enhanced
RDP environment too.
Can you confirm that in your guest definition you maintain
even when you test via TSPLUS?
So that in this moment your best experience is with an hybrid
configuration: spice for hw video
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:37 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:42:55PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 20:21 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:01:48PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:10 +0300,
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:32 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > We are a managed service provider so we are prohibited from offering
> > Windows 7. We are only allowed to license Windows Server 2008 under
> > SPLA licensing hence the cho
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:42:55PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 20:21 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:01:48PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > > > On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Su
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> We are a managed service provider so we are prohibited from offering
> Windows 7. We are only allowed to license Windows Server 2008 under
> SPLA licensing hence the choice. Although we do have one test Windows 7
> system.
Ok. So I c
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:05 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:42 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Sorry - the VM is Windows Server 2008, client is Debian Squeeze, host is
> > Fedora 15 - John
>
> Actually you already wrote details about the guest in one of your
> previo
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:42 PM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> Sorry - the VM is Windows Server 2008, client is Debian Squeeze, host is
> Fedora 15 - John
Actually you already wrote details about the guest in one of your
previous e-mails. And in fact I have a question for that.. see below
I would
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 20:21 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:01:48PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > > On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wr
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:01:48PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> > >>
> > >> - Original Message -
> > >>>
> >
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:10 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>>
> >>> Hello, all. I've been using both RDP via TSPlus and SPICE for over a
> >>> week
On 06/30/2011 05:33 AM, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello, all. I've been using both RDP via TSPlus and SPICE for over a
week now and the practical world results at least in my mode of
operation are becoming
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:22 -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > Hello, all. I've been using both RDP via TSPlus and SPICE for over a
> > week now and the practical world results at least in my mode of
> > operation are becoming clear. SPICE does handle major s
- Original Message -
> From: "John A. Sullivan III"
> To: "Alon Levy"
> Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:14:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Unfair comparisons with RDP
> On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 11:40 -04
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 11:40 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 15:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:36:26PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > Hello, all. Another question to be answered only if there is time. As
> > > we put SPICE head to head
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 15:34 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:36:26PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Hello, all. Another question to be answered only if there is time. As
> > we put SPICE head to head with the TSPlus implementation of RDP, SPICE
> > seems to be coming up
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:36:26PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> Hello, all. Another question to be answered only if there is time. As
> we put SPICE head to head with the TSPlus implementation of RDP, SPICE
> seems to be coming up a bit short and I expect it is somewhat unfairly
> so. It
Hello, all. Another question to be answered only if there is time. As
we put SPICE head to head with the TSPlus implementation of RDP, SPICE
seems to be coming up a bit short and I expect it is somewhat unfairly
so. It appears that RDP starts painting the screen sooner that SPICE
does and so it a
42 matches
Mail list logo
