On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:50 +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> We could throw many more into the thread.
> When comparing video encodings, we must take into account:
> - speed of encoding (many of the encoders are not fast enough for real
> time, they may decode fast, but we need fast encoding too)
> - qu
Dne 23.6.2011 11:49, Alon Levy napsal(a):
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:50:57AM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
We could throw many more into the thread.
When comparing video encodings, we must take into account:
- speed of encoding (many of the encoders are not fast enough for
real time, they may decode
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:50:57AM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> We could throw many more into the thread.
> When comparing video encodings, we must take into account:
> - speed of encoding (many of the encoders are not fast enough for
> real time, they may decode fast, but we need fast encoding too)
We could throw many more into the thread.
When comparing video encodings, we must take into account:
- speed of encoding (many of the encoders are not fast enough for real
time, they may decode fast, but we need fast encoding too)
- quality (and how to measure it - see
http://x264dev.multimedia.
How about WebM?
http://www.webmproject.org/
Sounds like it could be useful :)
Best Regards,
Attila Sukosd
-
DTU Computing Center - www.cc.dtu.dk
att...@cc.dtu.dk, gba...@student.dtu.dk, s070...@student.dtu.dk
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:58 AM, John A. Su
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 23:49 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:44:40PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:01 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:28AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:27 +0200,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:44:40PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:01 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:28AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > > Thank you very much for the expla
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:01 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:28AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > Thank you very much for the explanation. It's pretty much what I
> > > > expected - that the codec is differen
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:56:28AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > Thank you very much for the explanation. It's pretty much what I
> > > expected - that the codec is different, trading CPU efficiency for
> > > bandwidth inefficiency a
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Thank you very much for the explanation. It's pretty much what I
> > expected - that the codec is different, trading CPU efficiency for
> > bandwidth inefficiency and I certainly understand the reasons why.
> >
> > Is there any thought or pl
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:46:59PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 01:46 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:33:58PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > Hello, all. This isn't a critical question so please do not take lots
> > > of time to answer
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 01:46 +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:33:58PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Hello, all. This isn't a critical question so please do not take lots
> > of time to answer it unless it would be a helpful general discussion.
> > We are still trying to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:33:58PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> Hello, all. This isn't a critical question so please do not take lots
> of time to answer it unless it would be a helpful general discussion.
> We are still trying to properly set our expectations about video
> streaming using
Hello, all. This isn't a critical question so please do not take lots
of time to answer it unless it would be a helpful general discussion.
We are still trying to properly set our expectations about video
streaming using SPICE on low bandwidth networks. Indeed, this is our
principle interest in S
14 matches
Mail list logo
