On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 11:27 +0200, Alon Levy wrote: > <snip>> Thank you very much for the explanation. It's pretty much what I > > expected - that the codec is different, trading CPU efficiency for > > bandwidth inefficiency and I certainly understand the reasons why. > > > > Is there any thought or plan to make the codec configurable for those > > who are willing to sacrifice CPU for bandwidth, e.g., VP8, Theora, or > > H.264? > > > > I haven't done any testing on this but I think the cpu requirements are large. > maybe with hardware doing the encoding this would work well enough. > Technically > just dropping in a different codec and extending the protocol doesn't sound > like > a lot of work. Patches welcome? <snip> I wish I had the skill set to help in that way! Thanks - John
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
