>
> On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 21:00 +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > So the Spice server has a red_get_monotonic_time() function which, as is
> > the tradition, has a very similar name to a regular Glib function,
> > g_get_monotonic_time(), except that one returns the time in nanoseconds
> > and the
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
[...]
> > So I propose to rename these functions to spice_nanosecond_time() and
> > spice_millisecond_time() and to define both in utils.h. Would that be
> > ok?
>
> Why not use g_get_monotonic_time() everywhere? I don't think spice needs
> nanosecond a
Hi
- Original Message -
>
> So the Spice server has a red_get_monotonic_time() function which, as is
> the tradition, has a very similar name to a regular Glib function,
> g_get_monotonic_time(), except that one returns the time in nanoseconds
> and the other in microseconds and nothing i
On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 21:00 +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
> So the Spice server has a red_get_monotonic_time() function which, as is
> the tradition, has a very similar name to a regular Glib function,
> g_get_monotonic_time(), except that one returns the time in nanoseconds
> and the other in m
So the Spice server has a red_get_monotonic_time() function which, as is
the tradition, has a very similar name to a regular Glib function,
g_get_monotonic_time(), except that one returns the time in nanoseconds
and the other in microseconds and nothing in the name warns the
developer of that
