good nighthow can i improve the performance in accessing a proxmox VM via Spice?I have a big problem with playing videos, it only works well if I use very strong thinclient type I5 processors.___
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
I've spent another week doing some analysis of XSpice performance. This
is probably interesting mostly to me, but I thought I'd share the
results for posterity.
I was primarily concerned with performance connecting to a distant
server and spent some energy optimizing for that case.
I've used a m
On 13/03/2013 11:39, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:17:26PM +0100, Han Pilmeyer wrote:
I thought it might be nice to chime in with my results. I'm running
nearly the same versions, except that I'm still using the 0.30
version of the spice-guest-tools.
I just tested my net
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:17:26PM +0100, Han Pilmeyer wrote:
> I thought it might be nice to chime in with my results. I'm running
> nearly the same versions, except that I'm still using the 0.30
> version of the spice-guest-tools.
>
> I just tested my network speed at the KVM host and in my Wind
On 08/03/2013 18:24, Flo wrote:
now I renewed my System and tested it with virt-viewer on a very good
Laptop with ubuntu. The Performance is nearly 100% perfect. Sometimes
it is a little bit laggy, notably when I play videos in fullscreen.
When I go with the mouse cursor over a running youtube
performance
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> -
>
> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:54:08 -0500
> > From: mlur...@redhat.com
> > To: der_elef...@live.de
> > CC: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Performance
> >
&g
de
> CC: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Performance
>
> Hi
>
> - Mensaje original -
> > Today I've tested it with spicec on Linux instead of virt-viewer on
> > Windows. The performance with spicec is really better. Regards
Hi
- Mensaje original -
> Today I've tested it with spicec on Linux instead of virt-viewer on
> Windows. The performance with spicec is really better. Regards
>
What's your graphic card? Can you also test virt-viewer on Linux and compare it
with spicec on Linux?
Hi,
Today I've tested it with spicec on Linux instead of virt-viewer on Windows.
The performance with spicec is really better. Regards
From: der_elef...@live.de
To: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:45:43 +0100
Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Performance
Good mo
that I have not compiled the
packages by myself but used prebuild packages?
Regards
> Subject: Re: [Spice-devel] Performance
> From: dj...@redhat.com
> To: der_elef...@live.de
> CC: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:07:53 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> Flo pí
Hi,
Flo píše v Čt 14. 02. 2013 v 11:05 +0100:
> Hi, I've tested SPICE on a Ubuntu KVM Server
Could you share Ubuntu, qemu and spice-server versions, please?
> with a Centos 6.3 guest, but I'm not very convinced. The performance
> is not suitable for daily use. It sticks sometimes, especially on
Hi, I've tested SPICE on a Ubuntu KVM Server with a Centos 6.3 guest, but I'm
not very convinced. The performance is not suitable for daily use. It sticks
sometimes, especially on video playback. vdagent and qlx drivers are installed.
Are there some advices to improve the performance? Regards
> I forgot to ask that you measure CPU consumption on the server:
> You could have (manually) enable better compression schemes for the images,
> which would have reduced the total bytes sent.
> That costs CPU, though.
I did perform a crude version of that measurement (jiffies for the Xorg
proce
- Original Message -
> > I don't know what were the network conditions you tested, but it
> > would be great if you could repeat your test with lower bandwidth
> > (you can use tc), and also, you can try disabling off-screen
> > surfaces in the driver.
>
> I do have a test network construc
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 08:08 -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> > I don't know what were the network conditions you tested, but it would be
> > great if you could repeat your test with lower bandwidth (you can use tc),
> > and also, you can try disabling off-screen surfaces in the driver.
>
> I do have
> I don't know what were the network conditions you tested, but it would be
> great if you could repeat your test with lower bandwidth (you can use tc),
> and also, you can try disabling off-screen surfaces in the driver.
I do have a test network constructed for just that purpose, so I
can manag
- Original Message -
> I've spent several weeks analyzing the network performance of Xspice
> against two test cases. I also crafted a patch which implements an
> alternate mode for the xf86-video-qxl driver that dramatically
> improves
> network performance.
>
> The two test cases are si
Hi,
About the large number of packets: we do plan to aggregate small
messages together. Your analysis emphasize the importance of it. Thanks!
About the bandwidth: There is one important thing to take into
consideration - spice stream of messages is not deterministic; it
depends on the networ
Hi,
About the large number of packets: we do plan to aggregate small
messages together. Your analysis emphasize the importance of it. Thanks!
About the bandwidth: There is one important thing to take into
consideration - spice stream of messages is not deterministic; it
depends on the networ
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:52 -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> >
> > I'm very encouraged to hear this as we are very, very interested in
> > SPICE as a WAN protocol. We have noticed that the end user experience
> > is almost as dependent upon latency as bandwidth so I was a little
> > concerned that yo
>
> I'm very encouraged to hear this as we are very, very interested in
> SPICE as a WAN protocol. We have noticed that the end user experience
> is almost as dependent upon latency as bandwidth so I was a little
> concerned that you are sending pixmaps changes on a periodic basis.
> Does that in
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:12 -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> For a test involving 5 minutes of light use of LibreOffice, the results
> are as follows:
>
>Packets Bytes
> Xspice148,428 19,647,168
> Tight VNC 19,980 4,724,880
> SSH -X
I've spent several weeks analyzing the network performance of Xspice
against two test cases. I also crafted a patch which implements an
alternate mode for the xf86-video-qxl driver that dramatically improves
network performance.
The two test cases are simple [1]; a script drives either Libre Offi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:58:55PM -0700, Kai Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On 02/21/2012 10:57 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:49:04AM -0700, Kai Meyer wrote:
> >>
> >>On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
>
> On 02/
On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/21/2012 12:34 PM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/21/2012 07:49 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 A
On 02/21/2012 10:57 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:49:04AM -0700, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me se
On 02/21/2012 12:34 PM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/21/2012 07:49 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me set my expect
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:49:04AM -0700, Kai Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> >Hi,
> >On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
> >>>On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
> Help me set my expectat
On 02/21/2012 07:49 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me set my expectations straight. Should I be able to use spice
fr
On 02/20/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me set my expectations straight. Should I be able to use spice
from
inside a VM on my local machine to vie
Hi,
On 02/15/2012 06:22 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me set my expectations straight. Should I be able to use spice from
inside a VM on my local machine to view video streaming services like
Youtube, Hulu, and
On 02/15/2012 05:19 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me set my expectations straight. Should I be able to use spice from
inside a VM on my local machine to view video streaming services like
Youtube, Hulu, and Netflix? I have RHEL 6 Workstation for my hos
On 02/15/2012 01:16 AM, Kai Meyer wrote:
Help me set my expectations straight. Should I be able to use spice from
inside a VM on my local machine to view video streaming services like
Youtube, Hulu, and Netflix? I have RHEL 6 Workstation for my host, and
Win7 Pro as my guest. I've installed the q
Help me set my expectations straight. Should I be able to use spice from
inside a VM on my local machine to view video streaming services like
Youtube, Hulu, and Netflix? I have RHEL 6 Workstation for my host, and
Win7 Pro as my guest. I've installed the qxl driver in the VM, and used
Virt-mana
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 17:28 +0100, Frédéric Grelot wrote:
> > This sounds like you have mouse in server mode. Install spice-vdagent
> > in
> > the guest, make sure it is running and pleaser report back if it
> > solved
> > things for you
>
> You can also (in addition to that) force image compressi
> This sounds like you have mouse in server mode. Install spice-vdagent
> in
> the guest, make sure it is running and pleaser report back if it
> solved
> things for you
You can also (in addition to that) force image compression by adding the
appropriate parameter in your libvirt configuration (
Hello Ian,
Ian Barron píše v Út 20. 12. 2011 v 11:23 +0100:
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> We are trying Spice as a potential solution for remote access to a VM.
> (to replace VNC and NX).
>
>
>
> The current installation is :-
>
> Host: Fedora 16
>
> Guest (VM): CentOS 5.7
>
>
>
> Qemu-kvm : 0.15
Hi ,
We are trying Spice as a potential solution for remote access to a VM. (to
replace VNC and NX).
The current installation is :-
Host: Fedora 16
Guest (VM): CentOS 5.7
Qemu-kvm : 0.15.1
Spice : 0.10.0
Clients:
Windows 7 64 :
spice-client-win32-0.6.3.zip
spice_libs_win32
38 matches
Mail list logo
