Am Sonntag, den 26.12.2010, 09:55 +0200 schrieb Alon Levy:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 01:22:38PM +0100, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > What do you think about having a spice URL (scheme)?
> > The idea behind this is that we would like to register a protocol
> > handler in the browser
Am Sonntag, den 26.12.2010, 20:52 +0100 schrieb Marc-André Lureau:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Tiziano Müller
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > What do you think about having a spice URL (scheme)?
> > The idea behind this is that we would like to register a protocol
> > handler in th
From: Marc-André Lureau
Ex: G_STRUCT_OFFSET(SpiceLinkReply, num_channel_caps) is 172 bytes
when compiled with -mms-bitfield, and 170 bytes without.
GLib/Gtk are compiled with -mms-bitfield, and it is necessary to
compile with the same option for compatibility. The pack pragma
for MINGW32 correct
but these is no called qxl_worker_update_area,except
"dispatcher->base.update_area = qxl_worker_update_area".
2010/12/29 Alon Levy
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:27:57PM +0800, lin gu wrote:
> > Hi,guys!
> > I thought that when the QXL update_area,it will send a
> > RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_UPDATE
> >
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:27:57PM +0800, lin gu wrote:
> Hi,guys!
> I thought that when the QXL update_area,it will send a
> RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_UPDATE
> use Red_dispather,then the Red_worker will handler the message.
> but I can't find any code to create the the
> message--"RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_UPD
Hi,guys!
I thought that when the QXL update_area,it will send a
RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_UPDATE
use Red_dispather,then the Red_worker will handler the message.
but I can't find any code to create the the
message--"RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_UPDATE".
so I want to know if the QXL send the RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_UPDAT
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:38:53PM +0100, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Hi
>
> The current master doesn't build here on Gentoo Linux with jpeg-8b and I
> guess it doesn't for many others.
>
> Attached patch changes the detection for the jpeg_boolean symbol since
> that is a mingw32-specific thing as fa
Hi
The current master doesn't build here on Gentoo Linux with jpeg-8b and I
guess it doesn't for many others.
Attached patch changes the detection for the jpeg_boolean symbol since
that is a mingw32-specific thing as far as I can tell.
Cheers,
Tiziano
--
stepping stone GmbH
Neufeldstrasse 9
CH
