I see that you plan
* An agressive increase in the number and quality of associate projects
Question is: how are you planning to increase the _quality_ of associate
projects? And how do you measure quality in the first place?
--
Alvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile ICBM: S 39ยบ 49
F/LOSS which seems to be the candy
> the 'chicken hawkers' have to offer?
For those of us not in the know, could you clarify what a "chicken
hawker" is? In Wikipedia I find two definitions (one related to
homosexuality and the other to war stance in a politician), neither of
wh
Bruce Perens wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Aren't most laws absurd?
> It depends on how severe your spectrum disorder is.
And on your jurisdiction.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"Estoy de acuerdo contigo en que
t; contributing members that do not bother to read let alone subscribe to
> -general.
It's easy to paint the bikeshed of what list to give notice to. It
would be a lot better to have an answer to the actual gripe:
> > > > For other kinds of resolutions there are of course
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> With all due respect this seems like a motion for the sake of having a
> motion.
It is a motion for the sake of the board's recent failures to fulfill
member's expectations, I think.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPos
be cast with just pencil and paper -- which is the important
part on which pencil and paper should be used. The result counting part
is going to involve computers *anyway*, but since the input data (filled
ballots) is available and verifiable, this is not a problem because
different parties can have
Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> Awesome! -hilmar
Right. So instead of 37,510.86 we don't currently use for anything,
there are now 47,510.86 in the bank we are not likely to use for
anything either. Or did I misunderstand?
> On Nov 12, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Google's
Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/12/12 12:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> >> Awesome! -hilmar
> >
> > Right. So instead of 37,510.86 we don't currently use for anything,
> > there are now 47,510.86 in the bank we are not likely
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Peter Cock [2017-08-14 10:49]:
> > Should some of the funds be kept back for future domain renewal
> > fees, or are those covered from the ongoing SPI income?
>
> It's not very obvious but that's why I put the renewal of the domain
> before the transfer of the funds, i
Ian Jackson wrote:
> That's right. For your convenience my mail
> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:53:34 +0100
> quoted the thing again.
> There's one bugfix: "the the" should read "the".
No bugfix for "anticpate" or "predjudice"?
(I also wonder about "Nor do ... do so on Debian's behalf". Looks od
10 matches
Mail list logo
