Re: Voting system for elections

Hi Ian, On 2016-07-18 09:29, Ian Jackson wrote: [...] This is especially true given that our variant of Condorcet is still interpreting a ballot "1. Z 2. X" as not preferring Z or X to Y, which is IMO an extremely serious deficiency in itself. I fail to see how the system could infer any p

Re: Voting system for elections

Filipus Klutiero writes ("Re: Voting system for elections"): > On 2016-07-18 09:29, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is especially true given that our variant of Condorcet is still > interpreting a ballot "1. Z 2. X" as not preferring Z or X to Y, > which is IMO an extremely serious deficienc