On 2016-10-27 08:46, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:46:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board?
Certainly while I was on the board there was.
Thanks Neil
[...]
If you do not know, could you provide a concrete example?
Unfor
On 2016-10-27 06:10, Henrik Ingo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero
wrote:
Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
certain time will benefit or stren
On 2016-10-26 21:21, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/26/2016 05:46 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Henrik,
henrik
Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board? If so, could you
estimate the frequency? If you do not know, could you provide a concrete
example?
While I was on board there
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-26 21:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/26/2016 05:49 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-17 14:19, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
Right so there are many types of legal issue
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:46:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board?
Certainly while I was on the board there was.
> If so, could you estimate the frequency?
Not really, it was quite some time ago.
> If you do not know, could you provide a co
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero
>> wrote:
>> Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
>> certain time will benefit or strengthen the position of the SPI
On 10/26/2016 05:46 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Henrik,
henrik
Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board? If so, could you
estimate the frequency? If you do not know, could you provide a concrete
example?
While I was on board there was at least one instance where we had to
di
On 10/26/2016 05:49 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-17 14:19, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
Right so there are many types of legal issues. The one you bring up is
fine to be public. However the
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-17 14:19, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
Right so there are many types of legal issues. The one you bring up is
fine to be public. However there are others that are not.
Joshua, could you p
Hi Henrik,
On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and, of
course, which has to be)?
Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
certain time will
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and, of
> course, which has to be)?
>
Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
certain time will benefit or strengthen the position of the SPI memb
On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
Right so there are many types of legal issues. The one you bring up is
fine to be public. However there are others that are not.
Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and,
of c
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
On 2016-10-10 13:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/10/2016 01:57 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
Anything that is confidential. For example, a potential legal issue.
Why would a potential legal issue be confidential?
I would have thought legal issues should be p
13 matches
Mail list logo
