On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero <chea...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chea...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a >> certain time will benefit or strengthen the position of the SPI member >> project or SPI itself. For example, any legal situation where a >> complaint needs to be raised by the opposite side within a certain >> date, and the strategy of SPI / the member project would be to just >> keep quiet until that date. >> > > Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board?
I was involved in one. > If so, could you > estimate the frequency? No. Mine was some time ago already, but also the only one I was involved in. (e.g. frequency is 100%, but that's not really an answer.) > If you do not know, could you provide a concrete > example? No, that's kind of the point :-) henrik -- henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi +358-40-5697354 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7 _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
