henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
tions 2--4 of "verylong.pdf". The Schulze
> single-winner election method is currently used by SPI.
>
> Markus Schulze
>
>
> ___
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/list
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 02/28/2017 07:56 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>
>> Henrik Ingo writes ("Re: 2017 update to the SPI voting algorithm for Board
>> elections [and 1 more messages]"):
>
>
>> Finally, SPI sho
ng
> our ballot casting protocol.
If the current proposal is to simply change the software that counts
the votes, and continue using the current system for actually casting
the vote, then I agree 100%.
henrik
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero
>> wrote:
>> Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
>> certain time will benefit or strengt
skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
irc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
not
> even an SPI member project.)
>
> What do other people think?
>
> --
> Martin Michlmayr
> http://www.cyrius.com/
> ___
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+
Btw, if you work as a consultant or somehow else for a company, then
people often don't realize that donating IPR to a foundation like SPI
can be accounted for as a business expense, which means having to pay
less tax. This is just the same as you would do when donating cash, or
furniture, or old c
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Robert Brockway wrote:
>> I was at one point involved with another nonprofit that used this kind of
>> service. That nonprofit ended up moving those man-hours to in-house
>> volunteer board members because it wasn't cost-effective for their needs.
>> Although every
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> [snip]
>
>
>> If it is the same person as the SPI Liaison, then this should say
> It is not :)
>
>> "Successors will be appointed by the Fluxbox SPI Liaison."
>>
>> If there is a separate Fluxbox Project Leader,
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Robert Brockway wrote:
> 4. Mathias Gumz is recognised by SPI as the authoritative decision maker
> and SPI liaison for Fluxbox. Successors will be appointed by the
> Fluxbox Project Leader.
In an SPI context it is undefined what a Fluxbox Project Leader is:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>> 3) Liaison
> ...
>> This model has many advantages over a single self appointed person
>> having all control, but doesn't really add any overhead in normal
>> circumstances. I'd recommend to template this format and suggest it as
>> an alterna
lightweight and self
appointing in spirit:
4. Henrik Ingo is recognised by SPI as the authoritative decision maker and
SPI liaison for Drizzle. Successors will be appointed by simple majority
vote of the Drizzle SPI Council. The Drizzle SPI Council will initially
consist of Brian Aker, Lee Bi
14 matches
Mail list logo
