Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> i consider to submit this to the agenda of Novembers board meeting and
> seek for comments on this resolution:
Please don't submit the resolution as is.
> Resolution 2017-10-12.mzh.1: Supporting FSFE's "Public Money, Public
> Code" campaign
>
> WHEREAS
>
> 1. The
Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Robert Brockway wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> >
> >> Fabian Keil writes:
> >>
> >>> As mentioned before, it would be great if the services SPI
> >>>
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 13011 March 1977, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> > and whether SPI runs any infrastructure for common use by its
> > associated projects. (I realize I should have put that in a new
> > thread.)
>
> Yes, SPI does. The most common is DNS, though we also host
> stuff for projects l
Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> Apologies for the silence. To not leave this hanging, I'm in full
> agreement with the argument of preferring open-source software when
> there is a choice to be made. Though in fairness, Google invests a fair
> amount of money into open-source, and so using Google products i
Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > I think a complete list of services SPI is currently providing
> > and instructions how a project can apply for them would be useful,
> > too.
>
> Hi Fabian. I've proposed a new version o
Robert Brockway wrote:
> Hi all. I'd like to get feed back on adding additional information to
> the project pages. Specifically I'd like to add:
>
> * SPI services that the project is actively using and any that it has
> declined to use (some projects have declined to accept donations via
>
Robert Brockway wrote:
> Hi all. I personally feel that the associated-project-howto could be
> made clearer. I also read a few threads on various forums where some
> people had expressed confusion over certain aspects of how SPI works,
> even after reading the associated-project-howto.
>
> I'
