[SAtalk] Newbie Q: get all zero scores?

2002-06-20 Thread jason varsoke
l/IN-caughtspam folder). But the above mail message wasn't written to ~/mail/IN-caughtspam nor ~/IN-caughtspam and didn't appear in my INBOX (/vars/spool/mail/jvarsoke). It seems it got filter but deleted instead of sent anywhere (or at least I can't find it. Please, any ideas? -j _

[SAtalk] fetchmail and the "From" field as applies to auto-whitelisting

2002-06-20 Thread jason varsoke
> But forwarding the same message to my self gives this in the procmail log > file when the spamassassin -D option is used: > > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/etc/spamassassin/rules" for site rules dir > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/.spamassassin" for user state dir > debug: using "/home/jvarsoke/.s

Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
Dan, How do you "set score to 0.0"? I'm having the opposite problem. All my scores in the Debug log are 0.0! But spamassassin -t works fine. Any suggestions? -j On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > > What's up with FORGED_EBAY_RCVD? Installed the CVS and now its been hitting > on mo

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Smart, Dan wrote: > You set score to 0.0 by putting in local.cf > > score FORGED_EBAY_RCVD 0.0 > > Your X-Spam-Status in the message headers shows 0.0 with not tests being > hit? yes. Here's what I get. (I deleted the subject line becasue I sent a message to this list

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > > > This is my recipe: > > > > :0fw > > | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -D -c $HOME/etc/spamassassin/rules > > > > Though I don't have a file called "rules"

RE: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD broken!

2002-06-21 Thread jason varsoke
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, jason varsoke wrote: > > > Yes, Bart, thank you! I deleted the -c part of the line and now > > everything works; but of course I'm not using any rules. > > Obviously you're using *some* ru