dozens of spams in my personal mailbox
every day. I have v2.60 installed.
Wm
webmaster @ second glance . net
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of
above type of info.
Thanks!
Wm
> -Original Message-
> From: Pete Henshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:08 PM
> To: Webmaster; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Subjects not marked as spam anymore
>
>
> > I have had S
: Pete Henshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:08 PM
> To: Webmaster; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Subjects not marked as spam anymore
>
>
> > I have had SpamAssassin running with my Qmail for about a week now, and
> have
> > yet
at else I could be missing??
Thanx,
Wm
webmaster @ second glance . net
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Ana
> -Original Message-
> From: marc jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin doesn't appear to be running...?
>
>
> your mta should call spamc which would then interact with the spamassassin
> da
> Message: 26
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin doesn't appear to be running...?
> From: AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: SA-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:31:52 -0500
>
>
> You may also need something like this:
> http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
>
> --
> AltGrend
This release includes authentication modules, bug fixes, and code cleanups.
http://webuserprefs.pipegrep.net
WebUserPrefs is a PHP web front-end for editing SpamAssassin user preferences.
StarNet Communications, Inc.
12 South Sixth Street
Suite M110
Minneapolis, MN 55402
--
Thank you for contacting the Webmaster at HGTV.ca. We appreciate that you
have taken the time to write us, unfortunately, due to the number of emails
we receive, we cannot respond to every email personally. All emails are
read, and we assure you that your email will be passed on to the
>I've got my threshold set to 5, and stuff still slips through. It's
>usually *very* short spam, with cleverly spelled words like "p0rn" instead
>of "porn" and stuff like that. It's annoying, but spams like that have
>been few & far between.
My threshold is at 3, otherwise perfectly tuned for my
>Well, just so you know ... I took a random sampling from my corpus for
>the hspeed folks... Ignoring network tests:
>1.243:X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D2.0 required=3D5.0
>1.250:X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=3D11.8 required=3D5.0
>2.243:X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D1.3 required=3D5.0
>2.250:X-Spam-Status
>BTW, I think a threshold of 3.0 is a bad idea. But that's just me. I keep
>mine at 7.0 and I've still had a false positive or two. (caused by RBLs)
It's different for each situation. My work e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
is somewhat high-profile. It's on many web pages and has been active f
Also check out http://webuserprefs.pipegrep.net
It's a PHP template for editing user_prefs files.
Patrick
Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl
Date: Fri 1/10/03 10:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SAtalk] web interface?
wrote on Thu, 9 Jan
Yeah, I didn't include a sample file. Try downloading again. There's a sample file in
there now.
Patrick
Original Message
From: Daemon
Date: Fri 1/10/03 14:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SAtalk] web interface?
Maybe I'm missing something
Does anyone know of a good (complete) Administration how-to that covers
SpamAssassin called via MimeDefang working with Sendmail?
I've got it all up and running, but I get the feeling I'm really missing
the tuning and maintenance part of the equation.
---
An insult from an idiot is equal to a
Dear Group,
I installed successfully SA with amavisd through the spamproxy module.
I understand that this is a new script and is not quite stable, so my
question is: Can I setup SA without the spamproxy and be on the safe side
in terms of stability and security?
I'm running Postfix snapshot-2002
Hi,
First, funny thing happened today, I got the Digest flagged as spam (8.2/6.8)
I have spamd installed with spamproxyd on a Postfix machine.
I think my /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf file is not parsed, at least some
rules..
I'm not using procmail and don't need per/user prefs.
Is there anot
16 matches
Mail list logo
