I've noticed that too, the problem is that over the last two days I got more
virus emails in a couple of hours than I was getting spams in a whole day (and
the virus messages were bigger), never got infected though. I can't believe
that I'm actually looking forward to going back to plain old sp
I believe that the emails will all claim to be from a microsoft support
address which might be a part of the solution. Other things which might also
bump up the score would be "cumulative patch", "eliminates all known security
vulnerabilities" (insert sarcasm here), and "This update".
Steve
Fo
Jeff Koch wrote:
We use qmail, vpopmail, and qmail-scanner(also spamassassin but it's not
relevant to this question). We're finding that emails forwarded through
qmail to Hotmail accounts are getting picked up by Hotmail's enhanced
spam filter. These are simple text emails and Hotmail does not a
It doesn't seem like spammers clean their lists at all. I've got some virtual
userids in my domain which reject incoming mail at the time of connection to
sendmail (not by a return error email) and have been invalid userids for several
years at this point. They are still getting hammered on a da
Didn't get any response to this problem (the "I Hate Spamassassin" thread
got me jealous). Can anyone help?
While I've had SA working well on my Linux box for a while, today I decided to
upgrade it to 2.55 and add Razor 2 - it didn't go well...
I went through the Razor 2 install procedure and make
Jeremy Oddo wrote:
I agree fully. I have a very light-traffic server (10 users across 3
domains). One of our employees would receive 120+ SPAM messages a day. I
decided to put SA in place mainly for him (although I put every user on
it). He's still getting a lot of SPAM...it's just not making i
Jack Gostl wrote:
No... it doesn't take much at all. The "employee" as the president of the
company. He made a bunch of sales on eBay, purchased a handful of things
from online outfits, and POW! He was getting upwards of 200 per day. I can
understand it happening to me, I post in various newsgroups
Ben Johansen wrote:
Ok,
Not to start a flame war, but have 2 NT Servers Pentium 233 that have
been running for years, 24/7. There was a stretch from 96 to mid 99 that
they ran without being touched.
I don't get this argument
Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com
Microsoft itself opened up th
Jeremy Oddo wrote:
There is, of course, one other thing we need to do: we need to find those
people that BUY stuff from SPAM, take them out back and shoot them dead.
CAUTION: before implementing said procedure, please check with your local
law enforcement to determine if this is legal in your ar
This seems like it is about to become an accidental denial of service attack
on this mailing list. Might be a good idea to find a way of preventing this
before people who don't like SA catch on...
Steve
ANTIGEN_VF_EXCHANGE01 wrote:
Houghton Internationals' Anti-virus Service (Antigen for Exchange
Benjamin A. Shelton wrote:
> Yes. Beat uncooperative administrators with a very big stick. Or we could
> simply send numerous complaints to the postmaster/abuse/webmaster/whatever
> addresses of these domains and maybe someone will get the hint. Bonus
> points for humor and creativity gets you
This one got through, but I wonder if "Serious Candidates Only" should be
given some points.
Thanks
Steve
From - Sun Jun 29 11:00:12 2003
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from si64719.com ([218.52.79.31])
by home.geekster.com (8.12.1/8.1
12 matches
Mail list logo
