[SAtalk] spamassassin on a mail relay

Hi, I am running spamassassin on a mail relay and it seems that my procmail recipe is breaking aliases on the downstream mail servers. I am running Postfix-1.1.7-2 on the mail relay and it is configured to pass all mail to procmail for filtering (this is done as a special user "filter") where /hom

[SAtalk] Bayes and its effectiveness

Hi, Sorry if this has been discussed before. I looked through the archives and didn't see mention of this in any titles. Feel free to flame if this has been a beaten horse. I am looking for a tool/script that can tell me what percentage of spam was caught due to the additional Bayes points or

[SAtalk] 2.60 message/scan count

Hi, RTFM me if this is obvious but I looked googled, archived and read docs and couldn't find how to how many messages have been scanned in 2.60. It looks like the old bayes_msgcount file is no longer used. sa-learn --dump doesn't seem to provide this info either. From: 2.60: lib/Mail/SpamAssas

[SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

Hi, I an not seeing auto expiry occuring which I believe I have the correct configuration for. I am running SA-2.60-rc5, DB_File-1.806. In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (yes this file is being read based on the sa-learn -D output) I have use_bayes 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 bayes_auto_learn_threshol

Re: [SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:42:16AM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: bayes_expiry_max_db_size 5 # this is to force an auto expiry That's probably going to confuse things a lot. As the docs say: bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default: 15)

Re: [SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:38:40PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: Yes, I figured that if for some reason the 50k was too low that I should endup with 100k, but I here I have 165k and this is what is confusing me. 0.000 0 165010 0 non-token

Re: [SAtalk] v2.50 and local.cf

Thanks to all that responded. It was a BIG help :) Pete --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforg

[SAtalk] 2.60 minimal negative scores

Hi, My appologies if this topic has been covered already. I did do some searching though and didn't come up with anything. I am looking at 2.60 rules/50_scores.cf and am noticing that there are almost no negative local rules. I am actually tweaking my 2.54 rules and was thinking about removing

[SAtalk] 2.54 and RBL checks

Hi, I am running SpamAssassin 2.54 and can't seem to get rbl checks working. I have "skip_rbl_checks 0" in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. I have the default rules files with plenty of RBLs to check against. When I run "spamassassin -D rbl=-9 -t < /var/tmp/test" I get the following as part of

Re: [SAtalk] 2.54 and RBL checks

If anyone is interested I did some debugging and found that in 2.30 RBL checking code in EvalTests.pm did not strip reserved IP addresses before doing the check and somewhere along the way to 2.54 this was implemented and since I was checking with a 192.168... sender address this did not trigg

[SAtalk] defang_mime

Hi, I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - - change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to ``text/plain''. And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different content types: text, multipart, application, ... What I am trying to find out is what are the consequ

Re: [SAtalk] problem with whitelist_to:

Hi, I have been seeing this problem too. I am running Spamassassin-2.30. Is there a solution? I didn't see any responses to this question. TIA, Pete Rich Puhek wrote: >I've got a problem with whitelist_to, possibly just in my >implementation. > >I have several all_spam_to entiries for users t