Mike Schrauder
Specialty Blades, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ross Tsolakidis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] general question about usage of SA
Hi all,
Can I only filter selected domains even individual mailboxes
way to flip a switch so I can see the scores like the example above?
TIA
Mike Schrauder
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US
Yes sir, that did it. Someone else had told me the rtfm, but told me where in the fm
to look, so I found it.
Thanks!
Mike S
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred I-IS.COM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: Mike Schrauder; [EMAIL PROTECTE
where do I get the most up-to-date copy of PB&W?
Mike S
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn, Backhair, and Weeds
>
>
> Ok, now I am i
)
the evilrules.cf? Sry for my ignorance of all things 'nix. I checked
the POD Docs on the SA website to no avail. TIA
Mike Schrauder
www.specialtyblades.com
www.olfablades.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveba
ize: header tokens for X-MimeOLE = "Produced By Microsoft Exchange
V6.0.5762.3"
Can anyone tell me if this is screwing up the reclassification
of these msgs as spam? Do I have to strip out all headers that were
added after the spam got past the postfix box? TIA
M
st" mailto hyperlink. Just
a guess. 3 clicks and 0 reading the actual page text gives
Mike Schrauder
Specialty Blades
www.specialtyblades.com
www.olfablades.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less o
Does this mean satalk email was the victim of a joe job? Sorry for the ignorance,
just curious.
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Repo
Sorry, I didn't see the huge thread on this this morning. I am an idiot. Please
ignore.
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] R
it deleted?
else if $EGREP -q "^X-Spam-Level: \*{$SPAMLIMIT,}" < out.$$
then
# divert to an alternate local email address:
$SENDMAIL spamviewer < out.$$
else
$SENDMAIL "$@" < out.$$
fi
thanks much!
Mike Schrauder
Like an idiot, I tried on my own and missed about 45 minutes of email w/ a script
error! If there were any responses to my original post, could you resend?
pleeeaaaee?
TIA
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Schrauder
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:2
.mydomain.com[192.168.0.7], delay=5, status=sent (250 Message received:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@sw.mydomain.com)
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolai Strøm Gylling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
postfix to relay to the protected
server. I am sorry this mail is so unreadable. The shell script is getting chopped
up.
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolai Strøm Gylling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:19 AM
> To: Mike Sc
If I wanted to change the subject of spam to say *SPAM=14.3* instead of
*SPAM* site wide, is that possible? Is there a way to use the score as a
variable in a config file?
Where would I set up the way the subject gets altered by SA? TIA
Mike Schrauder
I am so sry. My eyes is goin crazy. Now that I am certifiable, can anyone tell me why
all those hits would generate such a negative score?
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris A. Kalin [mailto:cak@;netwurx.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:20 PM
&
Updraded to 2.43 yesterday on a debian pilot. Everything seems to be working fine.
Not doing anything funky that I can think of. But this message came through today.
Says score is 5.6 out of 5 and plenty of tests show, but the X-Spam-Level header has
no stars? Any idea?
Mike Schrauder
spammers from spoofing bonded sender headers? Thanks.
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris A. Kalin [mailto:cak@;netwurx.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: Mike Schrauder; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] What happened? hits 5
Where can I find docs on what this is, how it is generated, etc
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
TIA
Mike S
SBI
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://a
many descriptions in the file @ http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
appear to be in french. Is there an all english version somewhere? TIA
Mike Schrauder
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your web site
But just to be sure, I asked every
employee at my place of employment (50+) to tell me if they
were upset that I was tagging 'suspected' spam by changing
the subject. Not a single person was concerned and asked if
I could lower the score at which I shunt the spam to groun
I use this all the time w/ out troubles
sa-learn -D --mbox --spam spam11-23-03.mbox
Mike Schrauder
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 10:01 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: D
, subscription is free.
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 8:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re:
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?s=tc
>
>
Brian,
I used this site for about 95% of my setup. I used postfix in front of an
Exchange server.
HTH
Mike Schrauder
www.specialtyblades.com
www.olfablades.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkins, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 10:0
sorry, forgot the url
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkins, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 10:08 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix and Spamassasin
>
>
> Good Morning, All,
>
> I'm j
to 2.61-1 but it is working so well on 2.60
and I only have a production env so I
don't have the guts to make the upgrade. Anyone on debian upgrade from 2.60 to 2.61?
Any gotchas? Please understand, I am
a linux luser and can barely do a thing in linux. (Although I catch myself typin
25 matches
Mail list logo
