to me that hypocritical or no, that could
mean trouble for ISC if VeriSign chose to push the issue.
- --
Matt Beland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rearviewmirror.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Z9WwkgeEps3gMj4RAkArAJ4/ju5kKR1E/ZJYEH5/hUiEHORsqwCf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 10:16 pm, Steve Thomas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 08:31:55PM -0700, Matt Beland is rumored to have
said:
> > I stopped laughing, it occurred to me that hypocritical or no, that could
> > mean tro
4. Did enough research to find the mailing list, but not enough (apparently)
to see what the list is for.
Does anyone else think this is an odd series of coincidences? Or have I
watched too many conspiracy movies lately?
--
Matt Beland
s is good and
proper. Your mail server is doing something it shouldn't.
--
Matt Beland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rearviewmirror.org
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:08 pm, Chris Thielen wrote:
> To check if it was sent to the list I look for this header:
> X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the best header to check for:
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin
- --
Matt
